The International Sports Law Journal

, Volume 15, Issue 1–2, pp 49–54 | Cite as

2015 WADA code comes into effect: significant changes in the Spanish legal arena

Article

Abstract

2013 was a particularly relevant year for the study of legal considerations on doping. Not least because of the celebration of the Fourth World Conference on Doping in Sport that focused on the World Anti-Doping Code review process (Code that will be in force on January 1, 2015). This legislative issue has also been of great relevance in Spain. Hence, this work especially considers the legal implications of doping from the Spanish legislation perspective. On the one hand, this country undertook the task of developing and enacting a long-awaited regulation: the Fundamental Law 3/2013, enacted on the 20th of June, for the protection of athletes’ health and the fight against doping in sports activities, which was published on the 21st of June, 2013. On the other hand, on the 30th of April 2013, the Operation Puerto trial's resolution was made public. This resolution is still generating a storm of controversy with significant differences and approaches from the legal (conducted under the Spanish Criminal Law) and social world. This analysis of the fight against doping will emphasize with the creation of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and the new World Anti-Doping Code to come into force in 2015.

Keywords

Doping World Anti-Doping Code World Anti-Doping Agency Spanish legislation Spanish Agency for the Protection of Health in Sport "Operation Puerto" doping case 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is part of the Research Training Grant Programme from the Agency for Research Promotion and Management-DEIKER, at the University of Deusto. Likewise, this research has been made possible by the support of the Department of Education, Universities and Research of the Basque Government for supporting activities of research groups of the Basque university system with reference IT581-13. I take this opportunity to acknowledge all them for making this research possible.

References

  1. Amorós Martínez A (2012) El caso Contador: una lectura reposada a la luz del borrador del CSD sobre el proyecto de ley orgánica de lucha contra el dopaje, Revista Aranzadi de Derecho de Deporte y Entretenimiento, no 36, (ed). Aranzadi, Pamplona, Spain, pp. 457–492Google Scholar
  2. Atienza Macías E (2014) Doping and health protection: a review of the current situation in the Spanish legislation. Int Sports Law J 14:138–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (2013) Legal opinion regarding the draft 3.0 revision of the World Anti-doping Code, authored by Jean-Paul Costa, Strasbourg, France, 25 Jun 2013Google Scholar
  4. Gamero Casado E (2005) El dopaje en los ámbitos supranacionales: evolución histórica y situación actual, Régimen jurídico del dopaje en el deporte. In: Millán Garrido A (Coordinator) (ed) Bosch, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  5. Hardie M (2010) No va sobre la sangre: Operación Puerto y el fin de la modernidad, Revista Aranzadi de Derecho de Deporte y Entretenimiento, no 30 (ed) Aranzadi, Pamplona, Spain, p 135Google Scholar
  6. Jones K (2014) Lunch and learn: WADA Code 2015—the key changes. Int Sports Law J 14:143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McNamee MJ, Tarasti L (2010) Juridical and ethical peculiarities in doping policy, J Medical Ethics 36(3):165–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Millán Garrido A (2005) La lucha contra el dopaje en el Derecho español: síntesis normativa, Régimen jurídico del dopaje en el deporte. In: Millán Garrido A (Coordinator), Colección Derecho y Deporte directed by A. Millán Garrido (ed). Bosch, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  9. Muñoz Merino A (2013) Presente y futuro de la lucha antidopaje en España, Conferencia pronunciada en el Seminario de la Agencia Noruega Antidopaje: Doping in elite sports. What can we learn from major international doping cases? Oslo, Norway, 10 Jun 2013Google Scholar
  10. Palomar Olmeda A (2011) Salud pública y dopaje: un mínimo balance de la actuación tras la Ley Orgánica 7/2006, Revista Aranzadi de Derecho de Deporte y Entretenimiento (ed), no 32. Aranzadi, Pamplona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  11. Palomar Olmeda A, Rodríguez García JA (2012) La adaptación de España al código mundial antidopaje, Revista Aranzadi de Derecho de Deporte y Entretenimiento (ed), no 34. Aranzadi, Pamplona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  12. Pérez González C (2008) Las Obligaciones de los estados en materia de prevención, control y sanción del dopaje en el deporte, Monografía Asociada a la Revista Aranzadi de Derecho de Deporte y Entretenimiento (ed), no 4. Aranzadi, Pamplona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  13. Pérez Triviño JL (2013) The challenges of modern sport to ethics from doping to cyborgs, Lexington Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Vernet Perna B (2008) Delitos relacionados con el dopaje en el deporte, Instituto Universitario de Investigación sobre Seguridad Interior (IUISI), UNED, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
  15. VV AA (2013) Derecho deportivo. Legislación, comentarios y jurisprudencia, Palomar Olmeda A./Pérez González C (Coordination), (ed) Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, SpainGoogle Scholar
  16. World Antidoping Agency (2012) The Code in review. Moving ahead through stakeholder consultation and the code review process, Play True, no 1, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  17. World Antidoping Agency (2013) The World’s Anti-Doping Code. Collaborative. Coordinated. Complete, Play True, no 2, MontrealGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Instituut 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Inter-University Chair in Law and the Human GenomeUniversity of Deusto and University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHUBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations