Computational Methods and Function Theory

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 47–63 | Cite as

On Lappan’s Five-Point Theorem

Article
  • 148 Downloads

Abstract

A well-known result of Lappan states that a meromorphic function f in the unit disc \(\mathbb {D}\) is normal if and only if there is a subset \(E\subset \widehat{\mathbb {C}}\) consisting of five points such that \(\sup \{(1-|z|^2) f^{\#}(z): z \in f^{-1}(E)\} < \infty ,\) where \(f^{\#}(z)\) is the spherical derivative of f at z. An analogous result for normal families is due to Hinkkanen and Lappan: a family \(\mathcal F\) of meromorphic functions in a domain \(D\subset \mathbb {C}\) is normal if and only if for each compact subset \(K\subset D,\) there are a subset \(E\subset \widehat{\mathbb {C}}\) consisting of five points and a positive constant M such that \(\sup \{f^{\#}(z): f\in \mathcal F, z \in f^{-1}(E)\}<M.\) In this paper, we extend the above-mentioned results to the case where the set E contains fewer points. In particular, the Pang–Zalcman’s theorem on normality of a family \(\mathcal F\) of holomorphic functions f in a domain D\(f^nf^{(k)}(z)\ne a\) (for some given constant a), is also extended to the case where the spherical derivative of \(f^nf^{(k)}\) is bounded on the zero set of \(f^nf^{(k)}-a\).

Keywords

Normal family Normal function Nevanlinna theory 

Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 30D35 30D45 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the referee for a very careful reading of the manuscript, and for pointing out misprints. Tran Van Tan was supported by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under Grant Number 101.02-2013.13, and the Vietnam Institute for Advanced Studies in Mathematics. He is currently Regular Associate Member of ICTP, Trieste, Italy.

References

  1. 1.
    Aulaskari, R., Rättyä, J.: Properties of meromorphic \(\varphi \)-normal function. J. Michigan. Math. 60, 93–111 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chuang, C.T.: On differential polynomials. In: Analysis of One Complex Variable, World Sci. Publishing, Singapore, pp. 12–32 (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clunie, J., Hayman, W.K.: The spherical derivative of integral and meromorphic functions. Comment. Math. Helv. 40, 117–148 (1966)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dethloff, G., Tan, T.V., Thin, N.V.: Normal criteria for families of meromorphic functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 411, 675–683 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hayman, W.K.: Meromorphic Functions. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1964)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hinchliffe, J.D.: On a result of Chuang retated to Hayman’s alternative. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 2, 293–297 (2002)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hinkkanen, A.: Normal family and Ahlfors’s five islands theorem. N. Z. J. Math. 22, 39–41 (1993)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lappan, P.: A criterion for a meromorphic function to be normal. Comment. Math. Helv. 49, 492–495 (1974)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lappan, P.: A uniform approach to normal families. Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl 39, 691–702 (1994)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lehto, O., Virtanen, K.L.: Boundary behaviour and normal meromorphic functions. Acta Math. 97, 47–65 (1957)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pang, X.C., Zalcman, L.: On theorems of Hayman and Clunie. N. Z. J. Math. 28, 71–75 (1999)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pommerenke, Ch.: Problems in complex function theory. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 4, 354–366 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zalcman, L.: Normal families: new perspective. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 35, 215–230 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsHanoi National University of EducationHanoiVietnam
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsThai Nguyen University of EducationThai Nguyen cityVietnam

Personalised recommendations