On Lappan’s Five-Point Theorem
- 148 Downloads
Abstract
A well-known result of Lappan states that a meromorphic function f in the unit disc \(\mathbb {D}\) is normal if and only if there is a subset \(E\subset \widehat{\mathbb {C}}\) consisting of five points such that \(\sup \{(1-|z|^2) f^{\#}(z): z \in f^{-1}(E)\} < \infty ,\) where \(f^{\#}(z)\) is the spherical derivative of f at z. An analogous result for normal families is due to Hinkkanen and Lappan: a family \(\mathcal F\) of meromorphic functions in a domain \(D\subset \mathbb {C}\) is normal if and only if for each compact subset \(K\subset D,\) there are a subset \(E\subset \widehat{\mathbb {C}}\) consisting of five points and a positive constant M such that \(\sup \{f^{\#}(z): f\in \mathcal F, z \in f^{-1}(E)\}<M.\) In this paper, we extend the above-mentioned results to the case where the set E contains fewer points. In particular, the Pang–Zalcman’s theorem on normality of a family \(\mathcal F\) of holomorphic functions f in a domain D, \(f^nf^{(k)}(z)\ne a\) (for some given constant a), is also extended to the case where the spherical derivative of \(f^nf^{(k)}\) is bounded on the zero set of \(f^nf^{(k)}-a\).
Keywords
Normal family Normal function Nevanlinna theoryMathematics Subject Classification
Primary 30D35 30D45Notes
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the referee for a very careful reading of the manuscript, and for pointing out misprints. Tran Van Tan was supported by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under Grant Number 101.02-2013.13, and the Vietnam Institute for Advanced Studies in Mathematics. He is currently Regular Associate Member of ICTP, Trieste, Italy.
References
- 1.Aulaskari, R., Rättyä, J.: Properties of meromorphic \(\varphi \)-normal function. J. Michigan. Math. 60, 93–111 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 2.Chuang, C.T.: On differential polynomials. In: Analysis of One Complex Variable, World Sci. Publishing, Singapore, pp. 12–32 (1987)Google Scholar
- 3.Clunie, J., Hayman, W.K.: The spherical derivative of integral and meromorphic functions. Comment. Math. Helv. 40, 117–148 (1966)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 4.Dethloff, G., Tan, T.V., Thin, N.V.: Normal criteria for families of meromorphic functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 411, 675–683 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 5.Hayman, W.K.: Meromorphic Functions. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1964)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hinchliffe, J.D.: On a result of Chuang retated to Hayman’s alternative. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 2, 293–297 (2002)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 7.Hinkkanen, A.: Normal family and Ahlfors’s five islands theorem. N. Z. J. Math. 22, 39–41 (1993)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 8.Lappan, P.: A criterion for a meromorphic function to be normal. Comment. Math. Helv. 49, 492–495 (1974)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 9.Lappan, P.: A uniform approach to normal families. Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl 39, 691–702 (1994)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 10.Lehto, O., Virtanen, K.L.: Boundary behaviour and normal meromorphic functions. Acta Math. 97, 47–65 (1957)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 11.Pang, X.C., Zalcman, L.: On theorems of Hayman and Clunie. N. Z. J. Math. 28, 71–75 (1999)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 12.Pommerenke, Ch.: Problems in complex function theory. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 4, 354–366 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 13.Zalcman, L.: Normal families: new perspective. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 35, 215–230 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar