Advertisement

An intelligent integrated approach of Jaya optimization algorithm and neuro-fuzzy network to model the stratified three-phase flow of gas–oil–water

  • Gholam Hossein Roshani
  • Ali Karami
  • Ehsan NazemiEmail author
Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

The problem of how to accurately measure the volume fractions of oil–gas–water mixtures in a pipeline remains as one of the key challenges in the petroleum industry. The current research highlights the capability of a hybrid system of the Jaya optimization algorithm and the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), to model the stratified three-phase flow of gas–oil–water. As a matter of fact, the present study devotes to forecast the volume fractions in the stratified three-phase flow, on the basis of a dual-energy metering system, including the 152Eu and 137Cs and one NaI detector, using the aforementioned hybrid model. Since the summation of volume fractions are constant (equal to 100%), a constraint modelling problem exists, meaning that the hybrid model must forecast only two volume fractions. In this paper, three main hybrid models are employed. The first network is applied to forecast the gas and water volume fractions, the next one to forecast the water and oil volume fractions, and the last one to forecast the oil and gas volume fractions. For the next step, the hybrid models are trained based on numerically obtained data from the MCNP-X code.

Keywords

Stratified regime Three-phase flow Volume fraction Intelligent integrated system Jaya algorithm 

Mathematics Subject Classification

76T10 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aghakhani M, Jalilian MM, Karami A (2012) Prediction of weld bead dilution in GMAW process using fuzzy logic. Appl Mech Mater 110(116):3171–3175Google Scholar
  2. Aghakhani M, Ghaderi MR, Karami A, Derakhshan AA (2014) Combined effect of TiO2 nanoparticles and input welding parameters on the weld bead penetration in submerged arc welding process using fuzzy logic. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:63–72Google Scholar
  3. Amiri A, Karami A, Yousefi T, Zanjani M (2012) Artificial neural network to predict the natural convection from vertical and inclined arrays of horizontal cylinders. P J Chem Technol 14:46–52Google Scholar
  4. Amza CG, Cicic DT (2015) Industrial image processing using fuzzy-logic. Proc Eng 100:492–498Google Scholar
  5. Briesmeister JF (2000) MCNP—a general Monte Carlo N-particle Transport Code. Report LA-13709-M, (2000), Los Alamos National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  6. Catalao JPS, Pousinho HMI, Mendes VMF (2011) Hybrid wavelet-PSO-ANFIS approach for short-term electricity prices forecasting. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26(1):137–144Google Scholar
  7. Chau NL, Dao T-P, Nguyen VTT (2018) Optimal design of a dragonfly-inspired compliant Joint for Camera Positioning System of Nanoindentation Tester based on a Hybrid Integration of Jaya-ANFIS. Received 7 March 2018; Accepted 9 July 2018, Mathematical Problems in EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  8. El Abd A (2014) Intercomparison of gamma ray scattering and transmission techniques for gas volume fraction measurements in two phase pipe flow. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 735:260–266Google Scholar
  9. Hanus R, Petryka L, Zych M (2014a) Velocity measurement of the liquid–solid flow in a vertical pipeline using gamma-ray absorption and weighted cross-correlation. Flow Meas Instrum 40:58–63Google Scholar
  10. Hanus R, Zych M, Petryka L, Swisulski D (2014b) Time delay estimation in two-phase flow investigation using the γ-ray attenuation technique. Math Probl Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/475735 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Jang JSR, Sun CT (1995) Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control, special issue on fuzzy logic in engineering applications. Proc IEEE 83:378–406Google Scholar
  12. Jang JSR, Sun CT, Mizutani E (1997) Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing, vol 19. Prentice Hall, Prentice, pp 510–514Google Scholar
  13. Jiang H, Kwong CK, Ip WH, Wong TC (2012) Modeling customer satisfaction for new product development using a PSO-based ANFIS approach. Appl Soft Comput 12(2):726–734Google Scholar
  14. Jing CG, Xing GZ, Liu B, Bai QG (2006) Determination of gas and water volume fraction in oil water gas pipe flow using neural networks based on dual modality densitometry. Advances in neural networks, vol. 3973. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York, Springer, pp 1248–1253Google Scholar
  15. Jung SH, Kim JS, Kim JB, Kwon TY (2009) Flow-rate measurements of a dual-phase pipe flow by cross-correlation technique of transmitted radiation signals. Appl Radiat Isot 67:1254–1258Google Scholar
  16. Karami A, Rezaei E, Shahhosseni M, Aghakhani M (2012a) Fuzzy logic to predict the heat transfer in an air cooler equipped with different tube inserts. Int J Therm Sci 53:141–147Google Scholar
  17. Karami A, Yousefi T, Rezaei E, Amiri A (2012b) Modeling of the free convection heat transfer from an isothermal horizontal cylinder in a vertical channel via the fuzzy logic. Int J Multiphys 6:7–16Google Scholar
  18. Karami A, Akbari E, Rezaei E, Ashjaee M (2013a) Neuro-fuzzy modeling of the free convection from vertical arrays of isothermal cylinders. J Thermophys Heat Transf 27:588–592Google Scholar
  19. Karami A, Rezaei E, Rahimi M, Khani S (2013b) Modeling of heat transfer in an air cooler equipped with classic twisted tape inserts using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Chem Eng Commun 200:532–542Google Scholar
  20. Karami A, Yousefi T, Ebrahimi S, Rezaei E, Mahmoudinezhad S (2013c) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) to predict the forced convection heat transfer from a v-shaped plate. Heat Mass Transf 49:789–798Google Scholar
  21. Karami A, Yousefi T, Mohebbi S, Aghanajafi C (2014) Prediction of free convection from vertical and inclined rows of horizontal isothermal cylinders using ANFIS. Arab J Sci Eng 39:4201–4209Google Scholar
  22. Karami A, Yousefi T, Harsini I, Maleki E, Mahmoudinezhad S (2015) Neuro-fuzzy modeling of the free convection heat transfer from a wavy surface. Heat Transf Eng 36:847–855Google Scholar
  23. Karami A, Roshani GH, Salehizadeh A, Nazemi E (2017) The fuzzy logic application in volume fractions prediction of the annular three-phase flows. J Nondestruct Eval 36(35):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-017-0415-7 Google Scholar
  24. Karami A, Roshani GH, Nazemi E, Roshani S (2018) Enhancing the performance of a dual-energy gamma ray based three-phase flow meter with the help of grey wolf optimization algorithm. Flow Meas Instrum 64:164–172Google Scholar
  25. Mosorov V, Zych M, Hanus R, Petryka L (2016) Modelling of dynamic experiments in MCNP5 environment. Appl Radiat Isot 112:136–140Google Scholar
  26. Nazemi E, Feghhi SAH, Roshani GH (2014) Void fraction prediction in two-phase flows independent of the liquid phase density changes. Radiat Meas 68:49–54Google Scholar
  27. Nazemi E, Roshani GH, Feghhi SAH, Setayeshi S, Gholipour Peyvandi R (2015) A radiation-based hydrocarbon two-phase flow meter for estimating of phase fraction independent of liquid phase density in stratified regime. Flow Meas Instrum 46:25–32Google Scholar
  28. Nazemi E, Roshani GH, Feghhi SAH, Gholipour Peyvandi R, Setayeshi S (2016a) Precise void fraction measurement in two-phase flows independent of the flow regime using gamma-ray attenuation. Nucl Eng Technol 48:64–71Google Scholar
  29. Nazemi E, Roshani GH, Feghhi SAH, Setayeshi S, Eftekhari Zadeh E, Fatehi A (2016b) Optimization of a method for identifying the flow regime and measuring void fraction in a broad beam gamma-ray attenuation technique. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:7438–7444Google Scholar
  30. Nazemi E, Rokrok B, Movafeghi A, Dastjerdi MC (2018) Simulation of a complete X-ray digital radiographic system for industrial applications. Appl Radiat Isot 139:294–303Google Scholar
  31. Nazemi E, Movafeghi A, Rokrok B, Dastjerdi MC (2019) A novel method for predicting pixel value distribution non-uniformity due to heel effect of X-ray tube in industrial digital radiography using artificial neural network. J Nondestruct Eval 38(1):1–10Google Scholar
  32. Pousinho HMI, Mendes VMF, Catalão JPS (2011) A hybrid PSO–ANFIS approach for short-term wind power prediction in Portugal. Energy Convers Manage 52(1):397–402Google Scholar
  33. Pousinho HMI, Mendes VMF, Catalão JPS (2012) Short-term electricity prices forecasting in a competitive market by a hybrid PSO–ANFIS approach. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 39(1):29–35Google Scholar
  34. Rao R (2016) Jaya: a simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. Int J Ind Eng Comput 7(1):19–34Google Scholar
  35. Rao RV, Rai DP, Ramkumar J, Balic J (2016) A new multiobjective Jaya algorithm for optimization of modern machining processes. Adv Prod Eng Manag 11:271–286Google Scholar
  36. Rini DP, Shamsuddin SM, Yuhaniz SS (2013) Balanced the Trade-offs problem of ANFIS Using Particle Swarm Optimisation. TELKOMNIKA Telecomm Comput Electron Control 11(3):611–616Google Scholar
  37. Roshani GH, Nazemi E (2018) A novel dual-molality densitometer for gauging in annular two phase flows using radial basis function. Kerntechnik 83(2):145–151Google Scholar
  38. Roshani GH, Feghhi SAH, Adineh-Vand A, Khorsandi M (2013) Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system in prediction of fluid density for a gamma ray densitometerin petroleum products monitoring. Measurement 46:3276–3281Google Scholar
  39. Roshani GH, Feghhi SAH, Mahmoudi-Aznaveh A, Nazemi E, Adineh-Vand A (2014) Precise volume fraction prediction in oil-water-gas multiphase flows by means of gamma-ray attenuation and artificial neural networks using one detector. Measurement 51:34–41Google Scholar
  40. Roshani GH, Nazemi E, Feghhi SAH, Setayeshi S (2015) Flow regime identification and void fraction prediction in two-phase flows based on gamma ray attenuation. Measurement 62:25–32Google Scholar
  41. Roshani GH, Nazemi E, Feghhi SAH (2016) Investigation of using 60Co source and one detector for determining the flow regime and void fraction in gas-liquid two-phase flows. Flow Meas Instrum 50:73–79Google Scholar
  42. Roshani GH, Nazemi E, Roshani MM (2017a) Intelligent recognition of gas-oil-water three-phase flow regime and determination of volume fraction using radial basis function. Flow Meas Instrum 15:16–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.10.001 (in press) Google Scholar
  43. Roshani GH, Nazemi E, Roshani MM (2017b) Application of radial basis function in densitometry of stratified regime of liquid-gas two phase flows. Radiat Meas 100:9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.03.001 Google Scholar
  44. Roshani GH, Karami A, Nazemi E, Shama F (2018a) Volume fraction determination of the annular three-phase flow of gas-oil-water using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Comput Appl Math.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-018-0578-6 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  45. Roshani GH, Karami A, Khazaei A, Olfateh A, Nazemi E, Omidi M (2018b) Optimization of radioactive sources to achieve the highest precision in three-phase flow meters using Jaya algorithm. Appl Radiat Isot 139:256–265Google Scholar
  46. Roshani GH, Hanus R, Khazaei A, Zych M, Nazemi E, Mosorov V (2018c) Density and velocity determination for single-phase flow based on radiotracer technique and neural networks. Flow Meas Instrum 61:9–14Google Scholar
  47. Roshani GH, Roshani S, Nazemi E, Roshani S (2018d) Online measuring density of oil products in annular regime of gas-liquid two phase flows. Measurement 129:296–301Google Scholar
  48. Roshani GH, Nazemi E, Shama F, Imani MA, Mohammadi S (2018e) Designing a simple radiometric system to predict void fraction percentage independent of flow pattern using radial basis function. Metrol Meas Syst 25(2):347–358Google Scholar
  49. Salgado CM, Brandao LEB, Schirru R, Pereira CMNA, Xavier da Silva A, Ramos R (2009) Prediction of volume fractions in three-phase flows using nuclear technique and artificial neural network. Appl Radiat Isot 67:1812–1818Google Scholar
  50. Salgado CM, Pereira CMNA, Schirru R, Brandao LEB (2010) Flow regime identification and volume fraction prediction in multiphase flows by means of gamma-ray attenuation and artificial neural networks. Prog Nucl Energy 52:555–562Google Scholar
  51. Salgado CM, Brandao LEB, Pereira CMNA, Salgado WL (2014) Salinity independent volume fraction prediction in annular and stratified (water-gas-oil) multiphase flows using artificial neural networks. Prog Nucl Energy 76:17–23Google Scholar
  52. Sargolzaei A, Faez K, Sargolzaei S (2011) A new method for foetal electrocardiogram extraction using adaptive nero-fuzzy interference system trained with PSO algorithm. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology (EIT)Google Scholar
  53. Suraj, Sinha RK, Ghosh S (2016) Jaya based ANFIS for monitoring of two class motor imagery task. IEEE Access 4:9273–9282Google Scholar
  54. Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst 15:116Google Scholar
  55. Trivedi IN, Jangir P, Bhoye M, Jangir N, Parmar SA, Kumar A (2016) Training multi-layer perceptrons in neural network using Jaya algorithm. IEEE (CSNT-2016)Google Scholar
  56. M. Turki, S. Bouzaida, A. Sakly, F. M’Sahli (2012) Adaptive control of nonlinear system using neuro-fuzzy learning by PSO algorithm. in Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), 2012 16th IEEE Mediterranean, (2012)Google Scholar
  57. Venkata Rao R, Rai Dhiraj P (2017) Optimization of submerged arc welding process parameters using quasi-oppositional based Jaya algorithm. J Mech Sci Technol 31(5):2513–2522Google Scholar
  58. Warid W, Hizam H, Mariun H, Abdul-Wahab NI (2016) Optimal power flow using the Jaya algorithm. Energies 678:2–18Google Scholar
  59. Yadollahi A, Nazemi E, Zolfaghari A, Ajorloo AM (2016a) Application of artificial neural network for predicting the optimal mixture of radiation shielding concrete. Prog Nucl Energy 89:69–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.02.010 Google Scholar
  60. Yadollahi A, Nazemi E, Zolfaghari A, Ajorloo AM (2016b) Optimization of thermal neutron shield concrete mixture using artificial neural network. Nucl Eng Des 305:146–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.05.012 Google Scholar
  61. Yousefi T, Karami A, Rezaei E, Ebrahimi S (2012) Fuzzy modeling of the forced convection heat transfer from a V-shaped plate exposed to an air impingement slot jet. Heat Transf Asian Res 41:5Google Scholar
  62. Zadeh LA (1965) Information and Control. Fuzzy sets 8:338–353Google Scholar
  63. Zhang Y, Yang X, Cattani C, Rao RV, Wang S, Phillips P (2016) Tea category identification using a novel fractional Fourier entropy and Jaya algorithm. Entropy 18:77Google Scholar
  64. Zych M, Petryka L, Kępiński J, Hanus R, Bujak T, Puskarczyk E (2014) Radioisotope investigations of compound two-phase flows in an open channel. Flow Meas Instrum 35:11–15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SBMAC - Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática Aplicada e Computacional 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gholam Hossein Roshani
    • 1
  • Ali Karami
    • 2
  • Ehsan Nazemi
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Electrical Engineering DepartmentKermanshah University of TechnologyKermanshahIran
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentRazi UniversityKermanshahIran
  3. 3.Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations