Computational and Applied Mathematics

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 1733–1746 | Cite as

Numerical study of body shape and wing flexibility in fluid structure interaction

Article
  • 113 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we numerically investigate the impact of body shape and wing orientation upon the flow induced drag forces experienced by a body in its steady state. The current study focuses on simple toy models but derives its motivations from previous reported work on wind-induced drag on birds in flight most of which are experimental in nature. Our numerical results show that body shape/eccentricites, wing length and orientation are all important in determining the forces experienced by a body in a flow. Their geometries and specific features are key to determining the optimal mode of locomotion which is determined by looking at the relationship between drag force, bending behavior versus flow and geometric parameters.

Keywords

Fluid-structure interaction Flexibility Vogel exponent 

Mathematics Subject Classification

76Bxx 76Zxx 

References

  1. Alben S, Shelley M, Zhang J (2002) Drag reduction through self-similar bending of a flexible body. Nature 420:479–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alben S, Shelley M, Zhang J (2004) How flexibility induces streamlining in a two-dimensional flow. Phys Fluids 16(5):1694–1713CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Allaire R, Guerron P, Nita B, Nolan P, Vaidya A (2015) On the equilibrium configurations of flexible fibers in a flow. Int J Non-Linear Mech 69:157–165Google Scholar
  4. Camassa R, Chung BJ, Howard P, McLaughlin RM, Vaidya A (2010) Vortex induced oscillations of cylinders at low and intermediate Reynolds numbers. In: Sequeira A, Rannacher R (eds) Advanced in mathematical fluid mechanics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. Childress S (1981) Mechanics of swimming and flying, Cambridge Studies in Mathematical Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)Google Scholar
  6. Cortes S, Guemes D, Avila R (2013) Low Reynolds number flow around a flying saucer micro air vehicle. Technical Papers and Presentations, COMSOLGoogle Scholar
  7. Fields SB, Klaus M, Moore MG, Nori F (1997) Chaotic dynamics of falling disks. Nature 388:252–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galdi GP (2002) On the motion of a rigid body in a viscous fluid: a mathematical analysis with applications, handbook of mathematical fluid mechanics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 653–791Google Scholar
  9. Galdi GP, Vaidya A (2001) Translational steady fall of symmetric bodies in Navier–Stokes liquid, with application to particle sedimentation. J Math Fluid Mech 3:183–211CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Gosselin F, de Langre E, Machado-Almeida BA (2010) Drag reduction of flexible plates by reconfiguration. J Fluid Mech 650:319CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamershock David M, Seamans Thomas W, Bernhardt Glen E (1995) Determination of body density for twelve bird species. J Fluid Mech 137(3):424–428Google Scholar
  12. Harder D, Speck O, Hurd C, Speck T (2004) Reconfiguration as a prerequisite for survival in highly unstable flow-dominated habitats. J Plant Growth Regul 23:98–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang L, Quinn SJ, Ellis PD, Williams JE (1995) Biomechanics of snoring. Endeavour 19(3):96–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirchoff G (1869) Uber die Bewegung enines Rotationskorpers in einer flussigkeit. J Reine Angew Math Soc 71:237–281Google Scholar
  15. Leal LG (1980) Particle motion in a viscous fluid. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 12:435–476CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Luhar M, Nepf HM (2011) Flow induced reconfiguration of bouyant and flexible aquatic vegetation. Limnol Oceanogr 56(6):2003–2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nolan P (2015) Master’s Thesis, Montclair State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. Pedersen LB, Rosenbaum JL (2008) Intraflagellar transport (IFT) role in ciliary assembly, resorption and signalling. Curr Top Dev Biol 85:23–61Google Scholar
  19. Shelley MJ, Zhang J (2011) Flapping and bending bodies interacting with fluid flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43:449–465CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. Slaughter WS (2002) The linearized theory of elasticity. Birkhauser, BaselCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanabe Y, Kaneko K (1994) Behavior of falling paper. Phys Rev Lett 73(10):1372–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tennekes H (1996) The simple science of flight: from insects to jumbo jets. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Vogel S (1984) Drag and flexibility in sessile organisms. Am Zool 24(1):37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vogel S (1989) Drag and reconfiguration of broad leaves in high winds. J Exp Bot 40(217):941–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vogel S (1995) Better bent than broken. Discover 16(5):62–67Google Scholar
  26. Volker J (2004) Reference values for drag and lift of a two-dimensional time-dependent flow around a cylinder. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 44:777–788CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Willmarth WW, Hawk NE, Galloway AJ, Roos FW (1967) J Fluid Mech 27:177–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhu L (2007) Viscous flow past a flexible fibre tethered at its center pint: vortex shedding. J Fluid Mech 587:217–234CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SBMAC - Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática Aplicada e Computacional 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Complex Fluids Laboratory, Department of Mathematical SciencesMontclair State UniversityMontclairUSA

Personalised recommendations