Multivariable Greenhouse Control Using the Filtered Smith Predictor
- 288 Downloads
The increasing demand for high-efficiency greenhouse control systems motivates the interest in ensuring optimal growth climate conditions into the system. The greenhouse climate control is complex because of the strong coupling between the two main controlled variables (temperature and humidity), the time delays present within the control loop and the high nonlinear interaction between the physical and the biological subsystems. In this context, the idea of this work is to improve the robust behavior of the Filtered Smith Predictor (FSP) in an equivalent greenhouse climate model with multiple time delays as a function of the uncertainty degree of the process model to be controlled. An automated tuning technique is proposed for the robustness filter of MIMO-FSP through online estimation of the modeling error. Simulation results show that the proposed technique is able to improve disturbance rejection dynamics while assuring robust stability.
KeywordsGreenhouse Dead-time compensators MIMO processes Robustness
Financial support from the Brazilian funding agencies CAPES and CNPq is gratefully acknowledged.
- Aguirre, L. A. (2001). Introduç ao à Identificaç ao de Sistemas: Técnicas Lineares e N ao-Lineares Aplicadas a Sistemas Reais (Introduction to System Identification: linear and nonlinear methods applied to real systems). Belo Horizonte: UFMG.Google Scholar
- Azaza, M., Echaieb, K., Mami, A., & Iqbal, A. (2014). Optimized micro-climate controller of a greenhouse powered by photovoltaic generator. In: Renewable energy congress (IREC), 2014 5th international, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
- Gonçalves, R., & Santos, T.L.M. (2015). Sintonia automatizada do filtro de robustez para o controle de sistemas com atraso (Automated tuning of robustness filter for control systems with delays). In: XII Simpósio Brasileiro de Automaç ao Inteligente (SBAI).Google Scholar
- Gurban, E.H., & Andreescu, G. (2012). Comparison study of \(PID\) controller tuning for greenhouse climate with feedback-feedforward linearization and decoupling. In: System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), 2012, pp. 1-6.Google Scholar
- Landau, I. D., & Zito, G. (2006). Digital control system. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Merle, H. J., & Alan, J. M. (1995). Protected Agriculture: A Global Review. World Bank Technical Paper, 23(15), 157.Google Scholar
- Normey-Rico, J. E., & Camacho, E. F. (2008). Dead-time compensators: A survey. Control Engineering Practice, 16(4), 407–428.Google Scholar
- Palmor, Z. J. (1996). Time-delay compensation—Smith predictor and its modifications. In: CRC and IEEE Press, Boca Raton, (pp. 224—237)Google Scholar
- Smith, O. J. M. (1957). Closer control of loops with dead time. Chemical Engineering Progress, 53(5), 217–219.Google Scholar