Teacher’s Perceptions and Readiness to Teach Coding Skills: A Comparative Study Between Finland, Mainland China, Singapore, Taiwan, and South Korea

  • Longkai Wu
  • Chee-Kit LooiEmail author
  • Jari Multisilta
  • Meng-Leong How
  • Hyungshin Choi
  • Ting-Chia Hsu
  • Pauliina Tuomi
Regular Article


Many education systems have recognized the importance of computational thinking and coding skills and are implementing curricular changes to introduce coding into formal school education. A necessary and critical success factor involves the preparation of and support for teachers to teach coding. Thus, understanding the perceptions of teachers towards coding is most important, together with knowing the kinds of support they received, and their readiness and challenges to teach. The purpose of the current study is to compare teachers’ attitudes towards the importance of information and communications technologies (ICT) skills and coding skills in Finland, Mainland China, Singapore, Taiwan, and South Korea. The findings indicate that teachers in Finland, Singapore, Taiwan, and South Korea believe that coding is useful even if students will not work in ICT jobs while Mainland Chinese teachers are undecided. Mainland China, Singapore, Taiwan, and South Korea have more positive views towards how to prepare for future-ready learners.


Coding skills Computational thinking Twenty first century skills Primary school Comparative research Attitudes 



  1. Adamson, B., & Morris, P. (2014). Comparing curricula. In M. Bray, B. Adamson, & M. Mason (Eds.), Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (2nd ed., pp. 309–332). Hong Kong: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bower, M., & Falkner, K. (2015). Computational thinking, the notional machine, pre-service teachers, and research opportunities. In Proceedings of the 17th Australasian Computing Education Conference, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, C. M., & Chen, C. C. (2010). Problem-based learning supported by digital archives: Case study of Taiwan Libraries' History Digital Library. The Electronic Library, 28(1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dagiene, V., Mannila, L., Poranen, T., Rolandsson, L., & Söderhjelm, P. (2014). ‘Students’ performance on programming-related tasks in an informatics contest in Finland, Sweden and Lithuania. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation; Technology in computer science education, ITiCSE’14, pp. 153–158. New York, USA, 2014: ACM.Google Scholar
  5. Ealy, M. (2000). Technology and internet assessment (TIA). Clearwater: H&H Publishing Company Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Eickelmann, B. (2018). Cross-national policies on information and communication technology in primary and secondary schools: An international perspective. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K. Lai (Eds.), Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 1–12). Basel: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. FNBE (Finnish National Board of Education). (2016). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education [National Core Curriculum of Basic Education 2014]. Retrieved from,
  9. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fry, S., & Seely, S. (2011). Enhancing preservice elementary teachers' 21st century information and media literacy skills. Action in Teacher Education, 33(2), 206–218. Scholar
  11. García-Peñalvo, F. J., Reimann, D., Tuul, M., Rees, A., & Jormanainen, I. (2016). An overview of the most relevant literature on coding and computational thinking with emphasis on the relevant issues for teachers. Belgium: TACCLE3 Consortium. doi:10.5281/zenodo.165123.Google Scholar
  12. Grout, V., & Houlden, N. (2014). Taking computer science and programming into schools: The Glyndŵr/BCS Turing project. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 680–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guerra, V., Kuhnt, B., & Blochliger, I. (2012). Informatics at school - worldwide. Retrieved from Universität Zurich:Google Scholar
  14. Han, S., & Ye, F. (2017). China’s education policy-making: a policy network perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 32(4), 389–413, CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ho, W. K. & Ang, K. C. (2015). Developing computational thinking through coding. In Yang, W. C., Meade, D., and Liu, C. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Twentieth Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics (pp. 73–87). Leshan: Mathematics and Technology, LCC.Google Scholar
  16. Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Hsu, H. F., Wong, W. T., & Chen, M. Y. (2011). Applying the technology acceptance model in a study of the factors affecting usage of the Taiwan digital archives system. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2086–2094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hung, J. L., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: A categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher education, 24(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hutchison, A., & Reinking, D. (2010). A national survey of barriers to integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction. In Fifty-ninth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 230–243). Milwaukee, WI: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
  20. Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., Liang, J. C., Chu, H. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). A long-term experiment to investigate the relationships between high school students’ perceptions of mobile learning and peer interaction and higher-order thinking tendencies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jia, J., & Niemi, H. (2016). In search of the future of educational challenges in the Chinese and Finnish context. In H. Niemi, J. Jia (Eds.) New ways to teach and learn in Mainland China and Finland. Bern: Peter Lang D.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, S. P. (2013). Computing at school in the UK. Retrieved from
  23. KERIS (Korea Education and Research Information Service) (2015). White paper on ICT in Education Korea.Google Scholar
  24. KOFAC (Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity) (2015). Korea-UK joint research for enhancing SW education in elementary and secondary schools. Korea Information Society Development Institute 15-Jinheung-058.Google Scholar
  25. Kong, R., & Wong, G. K. (2017). Teachers' perception of professional development in coding education. In 2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 377–380).Google Scholar
  26. Kong, R., & Wong, G. K. W. (2017). Teachers’ perception of professional development in coding education. In 2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE).doi:10.1109/tale.2017.8252365.Google Scholar
  27. Kordaki, M. (2013). High school computing teachers’ beliefs and practices: A case study. Computers & Education, 68, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lambert, J., & Gong, Y. (2010). 21st century paradigms for pre-service teacher technology preparation. Computers in the Schools, 27(1), 54–70. Scholar
  29. Lee, M., & Tsai, C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the world wide web. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 38(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ministry of Education of China. (2010). National Plan for Education Reform and Development (2010–2020). Retrieved from
  31. Mok, K. H., & Leung, D. (2012). Digitalisation, educational and social development in Greater Mainland China. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 10(3), 271–294. Scholar
  32. National People’s Congress Mainland China. (2016). The thirteen Five-Years Plan. Retrieved from
  33. National People’s Congress China. (2016). The thirteen Five-Years Plan. Retrieved from
  34. Niemi, H., & Jia, J. (2016). What are the new ways to teach and learn in Mainland China and Finland? In H. Niemi, J. Jia (Eds.) New ways to teach and learn in Mainland China and Finland. Bern: Peter Lang D.Google Scholar
  35. Pang, S., Reinking, D., Hutchison, A., & Ramey, D. (2015). South Korean teachers’ perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction. Education Research International,. Scholar
  36. Sentance, S., & Csizmadia, A. (2016). Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and strategies from a teacher’s perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 469–495. Scholar
  37. Seow, P., Looi, C.-k., Wadhwa, B., Wu, L., & Liu, L. (2017). Computational thinking and coding initiatives in Singapore. Paper presented at the Conference Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education.Google Scholar
  38. Shepherd, M. M., Tesch, D. B., & Hsu, J. S. C. (2006). Environmental traits that support a learning organization: The impact on information system development projects. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 4(2), 196–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smart Nation. (2014). Why Smart Nation. Retrieved February 13, 2017, from
  40. So, H.-J., Choi, H. S., Lim, W. Y., & Xiong, Y. (2012). Little experience with ICT: Are they really the Net Generation student-teachers? Computers & Education, 59, 1234–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tsai, C. C., Chen, N. S., & Chen, G. D. (2010). The current status and future of e-learning in Taiwan. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tuomi, P., Multisilta, J., Saarikoski, P., & Suominen. J. (2018). Coding skills as a success factor for a society. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 419–434.
  43. Vahtivuori-Hänninen, S., & Kynäslahti, H. (2012). ICTs in a school’s everyday life. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 237–248). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang, J., Wong, G. K., & Dawes, C. (2018). An exploratory study on learning attitude in computer programming for the twenty-first century. In L. Deng, W. W. K. Ma, & C. W. R. Fong (Eds.), New media for educational change (pp. 59–70). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Longkai Wu
    • 1
  • Chee-Kit Looi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jari Multisilta
    • 2
  • Meng-Leong How
    • 1
  • Hyungshin Choi
    • 3
  • Ting-Chia Hsu
    • 4
  • Pauliina Tuomi
    • 5
  1. 1.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Satakunta University of Applied SciencesPoriFinland
  3. 3.Chuncheon National University of EducationChuncheonSouth Korea
  4. 4.National Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  5. 5.Tampere UniversityTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations