Advertisement

Students' Evaluation of Their Experiences with Project-Based Learning in a 3D Design Class

  • Tsai-Yun MouEmail author
Regular Article

Abstract

This study investigated college students’ experiences with project-based learning in 3D design, specifically for 3D modeling. A total of 49 college students from a Visual Arts program participated in this study. By implementing a project-based assignment throughout one semester, each student was responsible for completing his or her proposed design. In-class and out-of-class complementary methods were implemented throughout the semester. Focus group interviews were conducted to examine students’ use of self-regulated learning methods and experiences with project-based learning in the class. The results revealed that adopting PBL with complementary methods was helpful for developing students’ practical capacity and self-regulated learning attitude. The students used a combination of self-regulated learning methods in their projects, including other resources, online materials, problem notes, sharing activities, project diaries, and personal schedules. Their experiences with project-based learning were mainly related to motivation, sharing and feedback, and the teaching approach in the class. Some students expressed thinking of self-efficacy, problem solving, and reflection and self-assessment in the class. In general, the students showed more interest in 3D design, and higher motivation to complete the project. The project achievement promoted students’ confidence, practical skills, interest in the subject, and most importantly, their self-regulated learning attitude.

Keywords

Project-based learning Self-regulated learning Practical capacity 3D digital modeling Self-efficacy 

Notes

Acknowledgement

I am grateful to all the participants who were willing to share their thoughts, experiences, and achievements in this research.

Funding

Funding of this research work is supported by the National Science Council, Taiwan, under Grant Numbers NSC 107-2635-H-153-002.

References

  1. Artino, A. R., Jr., & Jones, K. D., II. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A., Freeman, W., & Lightsey, R. (1999). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Barak, M., & Zadok, Y. (2009). Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartolomé, A., & Steffens, K. (2011). Technologies for self-regulated learning. Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments (pp. 21–31). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, S. (2010). Investigating strategies for using related cases to support design problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 199–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1993). The IDEAL problem solver: A guide to improving thinking, learning, and creativity. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  11. Chiang, C.-L., & Lee, H. (2016). The effect of project-based learning on learning motivation and problem-solving ability of vocational high school students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(9), 709–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 111–141). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking-understanding how designers think and work. Oxford: Berg Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devolder, A., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2012). Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dynan, L., Cate, T., & Rhee, K. (2008). The impact of learning structure on students' readiness for self-directed learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 96–100.  https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.2.96-100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gourlay, L. (2009). Threshold practices: Becoming a student through academic literacies. London Review of Education, 7(2), 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heo, H., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1383–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herrmann, K. J. (2013). The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(3), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hugerat, M. (2016). How teaching science using project-based learning strategies affects the classroom learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hwang, G.-J., Hung, C.-M., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Improving learning achievements, motivations and problem-solving skills through a peer assessment-based game development approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(2), 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jansen, E. P., & Suhre, C. J. (2010). The effect of secondary school study skills preparation on first-year university achievement. Educational Studies, 36(5), 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joseph, N. (2009). Metacognition needed: Teaching middle and high school students to develop strategic learning skills. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(2), 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keyser, M. W. (2000). Active learning and cooperative learning: Understanding the difference and using both styles effectively. Research Strategies, 17(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kitzinger, J., & Barbour, R. (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2015). An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices. Computers and Education, 85, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lai, C.-L., Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-H. (2018). The effects of computer-supported self-regulation in science inquiry on learning outcomes, learning processes, and self-efficacy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Markham, T. (2011). Project based learning a bridge just far enough. Teacher Librarian, 39(2), 38.Google Scholar
  29. Martí, E., Gil, D., & Julià, C. A PBL experience in the teaching of computer graphics. In: Computer graphics forum, 2006 (Vol. 25, pp. 95–103): Wiley Online LibraryGoogle Scholar
  30. McAlpine, I., & Stothard, P. (2005). Course design and student responses to an online PBL course in 3D modelling for mining engineers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(3), 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3(2), 2–16.Google Scholar
  32. Nguyen, L. T., & Ikeda, M. (2015). The effects of ePortfolio-based learning model on student self-regulated learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(3), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nuutila, E., Törmä, S., & Malmi, L. (2005). PBL and computer programming—The seven steps method with adaptations. Computer Science Education, 15(2), 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paris, S. G., & Ayres, L. R. (1994). Becoming reflective students and teachers with portfolios and authentic assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paris, S. G., & Cunningham, A. E. (1996). Children becoming students. In Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 117–147). London: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
  37. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paris, S. G., & Turner, J. C. (2012). Situated motivation. Student motivation, cognition, and learning (pp. 229–254). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Poonpon, K. (2017). Enhancing english skills through project-based learning. The English Teacher, XL, 1–10.Google Scholar
  40. Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17(1), 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 83–110). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Sekeroglu, G. K. (2012). Aesthetics and design in three dimensional animation process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 812–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shih, W.-L., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2017). Students' perception of a flipped classroom approach to facilitating online project-based learning in marketing research courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 32.Google Scholar
  45. Stefanou, C., Stolk, J. D., Prince, M., Chen, J. C., & Lord, S. M. (2013). Self-regulation and autonomy in problem-and project-based learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(2), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stefanou, C., Lord, S. M., Prince, M. J., & Chen, J. C. (2014). Effect of classroom gender composition on students' development of self-regulated learning competencies. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30, 1.Google Scholar
  47. Tseng, K.-H., Chang, C.-C., Lou, S.-J., & Chen, W.-P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van Den Hurk, M. (2006). The relation between self-regulated strategies and individual study time, prepared participation and achievement in a problem-based curriculum. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(2), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. M. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Villagrasa, S., & Duran, J. (2013) Gamification for learning 3D computer graphics arts. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on technological ecosystem for enhancing multiculturality (pp. 429–433). New York: ACMGoogle Scholar
  51. Vuopala, E., Hyvönen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2016). Interaction forms in successful collaborative learning in virtual learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Warburton, N., & Volet, S. (2013). Enhancing self-directed learning through a content quiz group learning assignment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Winne, P. H. (2005). A perspective on state-of-the-art research on self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 559–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zheng, L., & Huang, R. (2016). The effects of sentiments and co-regulation on group performance in computer supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Shunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  57. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Visual ArtsNational Pingtung UniversityPingtung CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations