Advertisement

The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 127–137 | Cite as

Young Children’s Conceptions of Learning: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Early Years of Schooling

  • Ching-Ting HsinEmail author
  • Jyh-Chong Liang
  • Chung-Yuan Hsu
  • Meilun Shih
  • Feng-Ru Sheu
  • Chin-Chung Tsai
Regular Article

Abstract

This cross-sectional research was conducted to probe how 626 Taiwanese children’s conceptions of learning differ by age and gender via drawing. Participants were from the kindergarten, the first grade, and the third grade. A coding scheme categorizing the people, learning domain, and place in the drawings was developed. Chi-square tests were then performed to examine the associations among the children’s three grade levels, gender, and three categories: people, learning domain, and place. The findings showed that the kindergarteners tended to draw more family members as well as family and outdoor scenes, while the third graders tended to draw more school figures as well as classroom and school outdoor scenes. The first graders drew more peers than the third graders did. The kindergarteners drew significantly more social, informal, and playful activities than the other two groups did. The place for literacy learning switched from school (kindergarteners and first graders) to home (third graders). No gender difference was identified. This study provides insight into developing curricula that smooth children’s transition from kindergarten to elementary school.

Keywords

Learning conceptions Early childhood education Gender Cross-sectional study Transition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was, in part, financially supported by the Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.

References

  1. Anderson, J. L., Ellis, J. P., & Jones, A. M. (2014). Understanding early elementary children’s conceptual knowledge of plant structure and function through drawings. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13, 375–386.  https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental process. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 993–1027). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Brooker, L. (2018). Learning to play, or playing to learn? Children’s participation in the cultures of homes and settings. In G. Goodliff, N. Canning, J. Parry, & L. Miller (Eds.), Young children’s play and creativity: Multiple voices (pp. 14–25). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, M. (2009). Drawing, visualisation and young children’s exploration of “Big Ideas”. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 319–341.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802595771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buldu, M. (2007). Young children’s perceptions of scientists: A preliminary study. Educational Research, 48(1), 121–132.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880500498602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Chiou, G.-L., & Liang, J.-C. (2012). Exploring the structure of science self-efficacy: A model built on high school students’ conceptions of learning and approaches to learning in science. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21, 83–91.  https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1388a.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colliver, Y., & Fleer, M. (2016). ‘I already know what I learned’: Young children’s perspectives on learning through play. Early Child Development and Care, 186(10), 1559–1570.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1111880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook-Cotton, C. (2004). Constructivism in family literacy practices: Parents as mentors. Reading Improvement, 41(4), 208–216.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610065.Google Scholar
  12. Costa, H. J. T., Barcala-Furelos, R., Abelairas-Gomez, C., & Arufe-Giraldez, V. (2015). The influence of a structured physical education plan on preschool children’s psychomotor development profiles. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(2), 68–77.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03176190.Google Scholar
  13. Daniels, D. H., Kalkman, D. L., & McCombs, B. L. (2001). Young children’s perspectives on learning and teacher practices in different classroom contexts: Implications for motivation. Early Education and Development, 12(2), 253–273.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1202_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Einarsdottir, J., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Making meaning: Children’s perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 179, 217–232.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430802666999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  16. Howard, J., & McInnes, K. (2010). Thinking through the challenge of a play-based curriculum: Increasing playfulness via co-construction. In J. Moyles (Ed.), Thinking about play: Developing a reflective approach (pp. 30–44). Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hsieh, W.-M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). Learning illustrated: An exploratory cross-sectional drawing analysis of students’ conceptions of learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 139–150.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hyde, J. S. (2016). Sex and cognition: Gender and cognitive functions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 38, 53–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levine, S. C., Ratliff, K. R., Huttenlocher, J., & Cannon, J. (2012). Early puzzle play: A predictor of preschoolers’ spatial transformation skill. Developmental Psychology, 48, 530–542.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li, J. (2004). ‘I learn and I grow big’: Chinese preschoolers’ purposes for learning. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(2), 116–128.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin, T.-C., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2015). Conceptions of memorizing and understanding in learning, and self efficacy held by university biology majors. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 446–468.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.992057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin, H.-M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Conceptions of learning management among undergraduate students in Taiwan. Management Learning, 39(5), 561–578.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507608096041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marr, D., Cermak, S., Cohn, E. S., & Henderson, A. (2003). Fine motor activities in Head Start and kindergarten classrooms. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(5), 550–557.  https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.5.550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moll, L. C., Soto-Santiago, S. L., & Schwartz, L. (2013). Funds of knowledge in changing communities. In K. Hall, T. Cremin, B. Comber, & L. C. Moll (Eds.), International handbook of research on children’s literacy, learning and culture (pp. 172–183). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parmar, P., Harkness, S., & Super, C. M. (2004). Asian and Euro-American parents’ ethnotheories of play and learning: Effects on preschool children’s home routines and school behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(2), 97–104.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peterson, E. R., Brown, G. T., & Irving, S. E. (2010). Secondary school students’ conceptions of learning and their relationship to achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 167–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Price, G. G., & Hatano, G. (1991). Toward a taxonomy of the roles home environment play in the formation of educationally significant individual differences. Advances in Reading/Language Research, 5, 37–62.  https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.20.16wal.Google Scholar
  28. Richardson, J. T. (1999). The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 53–82.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sharpe, D. (2015). Your Chi square test is statistically significant: Now what? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(8), 1–10. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=20&n=8.
  30. Sobel, D. M., & Letourneau, S. M. (2018). Curiosity, exploration, and children’s understanding of learning. In M. Saylor & P. Ganea (Eds.), Active learning from infancy to childhood (pp. 57–74). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsai, C.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1733–1750.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000230776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Early Childhood EducationNational Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
  2. 2.Program of Learning SciencesNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Institute for Research Excellence in Learning SciencesNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  4. 4.Department of Child CareNational Pingtung University of Science and TechnologyPingtungTaiwan
  5. 5.Center for Teaching and Learning DevelopmentNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  6. 6.University LibrariesKent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations