Advertisement

The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 465–475 | Cite as

Diluting Minority Students’ Marginalization in the Mainstream College English Writing Classroom Through Functional Linguistic Praxis: A Case Report From China

  • Xiaodong Zhang
Regular Article

Abstract

This study investigates how systemic functional linguistics (SFL)-based teaching impacted on the adjustment of Chinese minority students to the discourse of academic English writing. Through qualitative analyses of one Chinese college ethnic minority student’s interviews, reflections, written documents, and conversations, the study shows that instruction from an SFL perspective in and out of class enabled her to re-conceptualize the valued linguistic features of academic English writing and effectively engage in academic literacy, which helped her to reposition herself as an English language writer in the mainstream college classroom. The study concludes that when effective instruction is provided on features of academic English writing, minority students can adjust to mainstream teaching, meeting the demands of complex academic English writing and reconstructing their identities in challenging social–cultural contexts.

Keywords

Minority students Transition Academic success Privileged language variety Linguistic knowledge 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was sponsored by MOE (Ministry of Education in China) key project of humanities and social sciences (16JJD740002).

References

  1. Adamson, B., & Xia, B. (2011). A case study of the college English test and ethnic minority university students in China: Negotiating the final hurdle. Multilingual Education, 1(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. China National Statistics Bureau. (2001). 2000 Diwuci Quanguo Renkou Pucha Zhuyao Shuju Gongbao (Di Yi Hao) [The Fifth National Census Key Statistics Communique´, No. 1]. Retrieved from http://news.sohu.com/44/98/news144449844.shtml. Accessed 14 July 2017.
  3. Duff, P. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  4. Gebhard, M., & Harman, R. (2011). Reconsidering genre theory in K-12 schools: A response to school reforms in the United States. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gebhard, M., Harman, R., & Seger, W. (2007). Reclaiming recess: Learning the language of persuasion. Language Arts, 84(5), 419–430.Google Scholar
  6. Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  8. Halliday, M. (1995). Language and the theory of codes. In A. Sadovnik (Ed.), Knowledge and pedagogy: The sociology of basil Bernstein (pp. 127–144). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  9. Han, Y., De Costa, P. I., & Cui, Y. (2016). Examining the English language policy for ethnic minority students in a Chinese university: A language ideology and language regime perspective. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(3–4), 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harklau, L. (2000). From the “good kids” to the “worst”: Representations of English language learners across educational settings. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harman, R. (2018). Transforming normative discourses of schooling: Critical systemic functional linguistics praxis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Humphrey, S., & Macnaught, L. (2016). Functional language instruction and the writing growth of English language learners in the middle years. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 792–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lian, S. (1993). Contrastive studies of English and Chinese. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
  15. Macken-Horarik, M., Love, K., & Unsworth, L. (2011). A grammatics ‘good enough’ for school English in the 21st century: Four challenges in realizing the potential. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(1), 9–23.Google Scholar
  16. Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2003). The language of evaluation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Murphy, S. (2003). Second language transfer during third language acquisition. Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from https://journals.cdrs.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2015/05/3.-Murphy-2003.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2017.
  18. Patton, M. (2005). Qualitative research. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 12(4), 431–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Shum, M., Gao, F., & Ki, W. W. (2016). School desegregation in Hong Kong: Non-Chinese linguistic minority students’ challenges to learning Chinese in mainstream schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(4), 533–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, Y., & Phillion, J. (2009). Minority language policy and practice in China: The need for multicultural education. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 11(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. White, J. W., & Ali-Khan, C. (2013). The role of academic discourse in minority students’ academic assimilation. American Secondary Education, 42(1), 24–41.Google Scholar
  24. Yang, J. (2005). English as a third language among China’s ethnic minorities. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(6), 552–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of English and International StudiesBeijing Foreign Studies UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations