The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 207–216 | Cite as

An Action Research on Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Peer Feedback in EFL Writing Context

  • Qi Xu
  • Shulin YuEmail author
Regular Article


While a number of previous studies have examined the effects and benefits of computer-mediated communication (CMC) peer feedback, little research has taken an action research approach to track the process of EFL students’ learning in CMC peer feedback. In this article, we describe an action research project conducted with 26 second-year students majoring in business English at a Chinese university. This project aims to enhance EFL students’ engagement with peer feedback activities and to help them improve their writing through CMC peer feedback. The analysis of multiple sources of data including questionnaires, interviews, blog-based peer comments, student writing assignments, classroom observations, and teacher reflections illustrates how blog-based CMC peer feedback can be a pedagogical and collaborative learning activity in EFL writing classrooms and how peer feedback training can enhance students’ engagement with peer feedback tasks. Implications for implementing CMC peer feedback in EFL writing contexts are provided in the paper.


Peer feedback Action research EFL writing Computer-mediated communication 



The study is supported by Innovative School Project in Higher Education of Guangdong, China (GWTP-BS-2015-20), and MYRG2016-00100-FED, University of Macau.


  1. Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breuch, L. K. (2004). Virtual peer review: Teaching and learning about writing in online environments. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in english language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Chang, C. F. (2012). Peer review via three modes in an EFL writing course. Computers and Composition, 29(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, K. T.-C. (2012). Blog-based peer reviewing in EFL writing classrooms for Chinese speakers. Computers and Composition, 29, 280–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng, K. H., Hou, H. T., & Wu, S. Y. (2014). Exploring students’ emotional responses and participation in an online peer assessment activity: A case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(3), 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi, J. W. C. (2007). The role of online collaboration in promoting ESL writing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
  8. Ciftci, H., & Kocoglu, Z. (2012). Effects of peer e-feedback on Turkish EFL students’ writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitze, M. (2006). Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences. Language Learning and Technology, 10(1), 67–86.Google Scholar
  10. Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamp-Lyons, L. (2007). The impact of testing practices on teaching. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 487–504). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ho, M., & Savignon, S. (2007). Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing. CALICO Journal, 24(2), 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional Science, 38, 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jin, L., & Zhu, W. (2010). Dynamic motives in ESL computer-mediated peer response. Computers and Composition, 27, 284–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, R. H., Garralda, A., Li, D. C. S., & Lock, G. (2006). Interactional dynamics in online and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Liou, H. C., & Peng, Z. Y. (2009). Training effects on computer-mediated peer review. System, 37, 514–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lo, J., & Hyland, F. (2007). Enhancing students’ engagement and motivation in writing: The case of primary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Min, H. T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of training peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Min, H. T. (2008). Reviewer stances and writer perceptions in EFL peer review training. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Savignon, S. J., & Roithmeier, W. (2004). Computer-mediated communication: Texts and strategies. CALICO Journal, 21(2), 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Topping, K. J. (2010). Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 339–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu, W. C. V., Petit, E., & Chen, C. H. (2015). EFL writing revision with blind expert and peer review using a CMC open forum. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xu, Q., Dong, X., & Jiang, L. (2017). EFL learners’ perceptions of mobile-assisted feedback on oral production. TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), 408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2014). An analysis of EFL students’ use of first language in peer feedback of L2 Writing. System, 47, 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2015). Understanding EFL students’ participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an Activity Theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 19, 572–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of English for International BusinessGuangdong University of Foreign StudiesGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of MacauMacauChina

Personalised recommendations