Advertisement

The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 55–64 | Cite as

A Qualitative Inquiry on EFL Learning Demotivation and Resilience: A Study of Primary and Secondary EFL Students in South Korea

  • Tae-Young KimEmail author
  • Youngmi Kim
  • Ji-Young Kim
Regular Article
  • 638 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents the components influencing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning demotivation and resilience. Semi-structured interview data from 23 EFL students and nine teachers were thematically analyzed guided by the Grounded Theory approach after systematic reiterative comparative reviewing. The major demotivators were teachers’ lack of clear delivery for elementary school students, excessive afterschool learning programs at private institutes for junior high school students, and impractical EFL lessons focusing on grammar rather than spoken English for high school students. In order to curb these demotivators and maintain high EFL learning motivation levels, four distinctive components influencing their resilience were identified: social support, emotional regulation, a clear learning goal, and tenacity in EFL learning. This study illustrates that emotional regulation, not negative emotions such as anxiety, is crucial, and students’ clearly stated short-term learning goal is a crucial component in maintaining high academic resilience. Participants cultivated specific components influencing resilience as they advanced academically. Additionally, high-proficiency EFL students exhibited greater tenacity and utilized various coping strategies. We argue for the necessity to refine the sub-constructs of EFL learning demotivation and resilience and recommend the need for a follow-up confirmatory study to prove the conceptual validity of these constructs.

Keywords

Resilience Demotivation English as a foreign language Interview methods 

Supplementary material

40299_2017_365_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (73 kb)
Online Resource 1 (PDF 72 kb)
40299_2017_365_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (18 kb)
Online Resource 2 (PDF 17 kb)
40299_2017_365_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (73 kb)
Online Resource 3 (PDF 73 kb)
40299_2017_365_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (68 kb)
Online Resource 4 (PDF 68 kb)

References

  1. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousands Oak, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Choi, I. C. (2008). The impact of EFL testing on EFL education in Korea. Language Testing, 25(1), 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi, D.-I., & Kim, T.-Y. (2013). Korean middle school students’ English learning motivation and demotivation. English Language & Literature, 39(2), 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Malmberg, L. E., Hall, J., & Ginns, P. (2015). Academic buoyancy, student’s achievement, and the linking role of control: A cross-lagged analysis of high school students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falout, J., Elwood, J., & Hood, M. (2009). Demotivation: Affective states and learning outcomes. System, 37(3), 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feng, W., Gu, B., & Cai, Y. (2016). The end of China’s one-child policy. Studies in Family Planning, 47(1), 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franklin, T. B., Saab, B. J., & Mansuy, I. M. (2012). Neural mechanisms of stress resilience and vulnerability. Neuron, 75(5), 747–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamada, Y., & Kito, K. (2008). Demotivation in Japanese high schools. In K. Bradford Watts, T. Muller & M. Swanson (Eds.), JALT 2007 Conference Proceedings (pp. 168–178). Tokyo: JALT.Google Scholar
  9. Herrman, H., Stewart, D. E., Diaz-Granados, N., Berger, E. L., Jackson, B., & Yuen, T. (2011). What is resilience? The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(5), 258–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu, G., & McKay, S. L. (2012). English language education in East Asia: Some recent developments. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(4), 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jung, Y. E., Min, J. A., Shin, A. Y., Han, S. Y., Lee, K. U., Kim, T. S., et al. (2012). The Korean version of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale: An extended validation. Stress and Health, 28(4), 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kikuchi, K. (2013). Demotivators in the Japanese EFL context. In M. T. Apple, D. Da Silva & T. Fellner (Eds.), Language learning motivation in Japan (pp. 206–224). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  14. Kikuchi, K., & Sakai, H. (2009). Japanese learners’ demotivation to study English: A survey study. JALT Journal, 31(2), 183–204.Google Scholar
  15. Kim, K. (2009). Demotivating factors in secondary English education. English Teaching, 64(4), 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, T.-Y. (2010). Ideal L2 self and sensitization in L2 learning motivation: A case study of two korean ESL students. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 10(2), 321–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, T.-Y. (2011). Korean elementary school students’ English learning demotivation: A comparative survey study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, T.-Y. (2012). An analysis of Korean elementary and secondary school students’ English learning motivation and their L2 selves: A qualitative interview approach. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 12(1), 67–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim, T.-Y., & Kim, Y.-K. (2017). The impact of resilience on L2 learners’ motivated behaviour and proficiency in L2 learning. Educational Studies, 43(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim, T-Y., Kim, Y., & Kim, J-Y. (2017). Structural relationship between L2 learning (de)motivation, resilience, and L2 proficiency among Korean college students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(6), 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim, T.-Y., Kim, Y.-K., & Zhang, Q.-M. (2014). Differences in demotivation between Chinese and Korean English teachers: A mixed-methods study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(2), 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, T.-Y., & Lee, H.-S. (2014). Korean junior high and high school students’ English learning motivation, demotivation, resilience, and English proficiency. The Journal of Foreign Studies, 29(3), 11–41.Google Scholar
  23. Leondari, A., Syngollitou, E., & Kiosseoglou, G. (1998). Academic achievement, motivation and future selves. Educational Studies, 24(2), 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46(1), 53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Masten, A. S., Cutuli, J. J., Herbers, J. E., & Reed, M. G. J. (2009). Resilience in development. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 117–131). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Morrison, G. M., & Allen, M. R. (2007). Promoting student resilience in school contexts. Theory into Practice, 46(2), 162–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olsson, C. A., Bond, L., Burns, J. M., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Sawyer, S. M. (2003). Adolescent resilience: A concept analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 26(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Plunkett, S. W., Henry, C. S., Houltberg, B. J., Sands, T., & Abarca-Mortensen, S. (2008). Academic support by significant others and educational resilience in Mexican-origin ninth grade students from intact families. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 28(3), 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shin, W.-Y., Kim, M.-G., & Kim, J.-H. (2009). Developing measures of resilience for Korean adolescents and testing cross, convergent, and discriminant validity. Studies on Korean Youth, 20(4), 105–131.Google Scholar
  32. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Zeng, K. (1995). Japan’s dragon gate: The effects of university entrance examinations on the educational system and students. Compare, 25, 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English Education, College of EducationChung-Ang UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations