The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 509–518 | Cite as

Digital Equity and Students’ Home Computing: A Hong Kong Study

  • Allan H. K. Yuen
  • Wilfred W. F. Lau
  • Jae Hyung Park
  • Gervas K. K. Lau
  • Albert K. M. Chan
Regular Article

Abstract

This study explores digital equity by examining gender and socioeconomic differences in students’ use of computers at home. It presents research findings of a territory-wide survey of 825 eighth-graders from 36 secondary schools in Hong Kong. Results of MANOVAs and ANOVAs indicate significant socioeconomic and gender effects on the home computing of students, including (1) socioeconomic difference in access and hours of computer use, learning-related use and parental mediation in guidance and (2) gender difference in learning-related use, and parental mediation in guidance and worry. No interaction effect was observed. The research provides empirical evidence that will stimulate discussion on issues regarding digital equity and students’ home computing.

Keywords

ICT in education Home computing Gender difference Socioeconomic difference Digital equity Parental mediation 

References

  1. Anderson, R. E., & Plomp, T. (2008). National Contexts. In N. Law, W. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT Use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 Study (pp. 37–66). Hong Kong SAR: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angus, L., Snyder, I., & Sutherland-Smith, W. (2004). ICT and educational (dis)advantage: Families, computers and contemporary social and educational inequalities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. BECTA. (2003). ImpaCT2: The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. Coventry: Becta Report.Google Scholar
  5. BECTA. (2008). Meeting their potential: the role of education and technology in overcoming disadvantage and disaffection in young people. Coventry: Becta Research Report.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1996) [1989]. The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  8. Bucy, E. P., & Newhagen, J. E. (2004). Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Carveth, R., & Kretchmer, S. B. (2002). Policy options to combat the digital divide in Western Europe. Informing Science, 5(3), 115–123.Google Scholar
  10. Chan, Y. M. (2000). Self-esteem: A cross-cultural comparison of British-Chinese white-British and Hong Kong Chinese children. Educational Psychology, 20(1), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan, K., & Ng, Y. L. (2012). Segmentation of Chinese adolescent girls using gender roles and ideal female images. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(7), 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Compaine, B. M. (2001). The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth?. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, C., & Jewitt, C. (2011). Introduction to the special issue on parental engagement in children’s uses of technologies for learning: Putting policy into practice in the home. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 27, 289–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeCoster, J. (2004). Data analysis in SPSS. Retrieved October 2, 2015 from http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html.
  16. Drotner, K. (2008). Leisure is hard work: Digital practices and future competencies. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning) (p. 167). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Durndell, A., Glissov, P., & Siann, G. (1995). Gender and computing: Persisting differences. Educational Research, 37(3), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. EMB. (2004). Empowering learning and teaching with information technology, July 2004. Hong Kong: Education and Manpower Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government.Google Scholar
  19. Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R., & Sutherland, R. (2001). Constructing the child computer user: From public policy to private practices. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(1), 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gamoran, A. (2001). American schooling and educational inequality: A forecast for the 21st century. Sociology of Education, 2001, 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gannon, S. (2008). ‘Twenty-four seven on the computers’: Girls ICTs and risk. Gender & Education, 20(4), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gil-Aluja, J. (2004). Fuzzy sets in the management of uncertainty. Berlin, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gunkel, D. J. (2003). Second thoughts: Toward a critique of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 5(4), 499–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harris, S. (1999). Secondary school students’ use of computers at home. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hollingworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on technology and children’s learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jewitt, C., & Parashar, U. (2011). Technology and learning at home: Findings from the evaluation of the home access programme pilot. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 27, 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, N. (2009). Teenage technological experts’ views of schooling. Australian Educational Researcher, 36, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalmus, V., Realo, A., & Siibak, A. (2011). Motives for Internet use and their relationships with personality traits and socio-demographic factors. Trames, 15(65/60), 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kapitzke, C. (2000). Information technology as cultural capital: Shifting the boundaries of power. Education and Information Technologies, 5(1), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerawalla, L., & Crook, C. (2002). Children’s computer use at home and at school: Context and continuity. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 751–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lareau, A. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education (2nd ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods class, race, and family life. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lau, W.F. & Yuen, A.H.K. (2014). Internet ethics of adolescents: Understanding demographic differences, Computers & Education, 72, 378–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li, L. H. (2011). Impact of housing design factors on children’s conduct at school: An empirical study of Hong Kong. Journal of Housing and Building Environment, 26, 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Light, J. S. (2001). Rethinking the digital divide. Harvard Educational Review, 71(4), 709–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). EU kids online final report. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  38. Loader, B. (1998). Cyberspace divide: Equality, agency and policy in the information society. London; New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moghaddam, G. G. (2010). Information technology and gender gap: Toward a global view. The Electronic Library, 28(5), 722–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sáinz, M., & López-Sáez, M. (2010). Gender differences in computer attitudes and the choice of technology-related occupations in a sample of secondary students in Spain. Computers & Education, 54(2), 578–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sefton-Green, J. (2004). Literature review in informal learning with technology outside school. Bristol: Futurelab.Google Scholar
  42. Selwyn, N. (1998). The effect of using a home computer on students’ educational use of IT. Computers & Education, 31, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Selwyn, N. (2011). Schools and schooling in the digital age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Shek, D. T. L. (1999). Assessment of global parenting style and specific parenting behavior in a Chinese context. Psychologia, 42, 69–79.Google Scholar
  45. Shek, Daniel T. L., & Lee, T. Y. (2007). Family life quality and emotional quality of life in Chinese adolescents with and without economic disadvantage. Social Indicator Research, 80, 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sølvberg, A. (2002). Gender differences in computer-related control beliefs and home computer use. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(4), 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parenting practices parenting styles, and adolescent school achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sutherland, R., Facer, K., Furlong, R., & Furlong, J. (2000). A new environment for education? The computer in the Home. Computers & Education, 34, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sutton, R. E. (1991). Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 475–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tacq, J. (1997). Multivariate analysis techniques in social science research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  51. Tondeur, J., Sinnaeve, I., van Houtte, M., & van Braak, J. (2010). ICT as cultural capital: The relationship between socioeconomic status and the computer-use profile of young people. New Media Society, 13(1), 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turkle, S. (2005). The second self: Computers and the human spirit, twentieth anniversary edition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. Valcke, M., Bonte, S., De Wever, B., & Rots, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education, 55(2), 454–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van Braak, J., & Kavadias, D. (2005). The influence of social-demographic determinants on secondary school children’s computer use. Experience, Beliefs and Competence, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(1), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  56. Vekiri, I. (2010). Socioeconomic differences in elementary students’ ICT beliefs and out-of-school experience. Computers & Education, 54, 941–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Volman, M., & van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 613–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vryonides, M. (2009). Applying Bourdieu’s concepts of social and cultural capital in educational research in Greece and Cyprus. In K. Robson & C. Sanders (Eds.), Quantifying theory: Pierre Bourdieu. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. Wan, C., Tam, K., Lau, I. Y., Chiu, C., Lee, S., & Peng, S. (2007). Perceived cultural importance and actual self-importance of values in cultural identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access. Use, and Outcomes, Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wellington, Jerry. (2001). Exploring the secret garden: The growing importance of ICT in the home. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  64. Yu, M., Yuen, A.H.K., & Park, J., (2012). Students' computer use at home: A study on family environment and parental influence. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  65. Yuen, A.H.K., Law, N, Lee, M.W., & Lee, Y. (2010). The changing face of education in Hong Kong: Transition into the 21 st century. Hong Kong: Centre for Information Technology in Education, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allan H. K. Yuen
    • 1
  • Wilfred W. F. Lau
    • 2
  • Jae Hyung Park
    • 3
  • Gervas K. K. Lau
    • 4
  • Albert K. M. Chan
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Information Technology in Education, Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongPokfulam RoadHong Kong
  2. 2.Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of EducationThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
  3. 3.Department of International Education and Lifelong LearningHong Kong Institute of EducationTai PoHong Kong
  4. 4.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongPokfulam RoadHong Kong

Personalised recommendations