The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 451–462 | Cite as

Does Reputation Matter? Case Study of Undergraduate Choice at a Premier University

  • Susila Munisamy
  • Noor Ismawati Mohd JaafarEmail author
  • Shyamala Nagaraj
Regular Article


The changing facets of the Malaysian higher education created market-based competition among higher education institutions. With increasing competition in the higher education environment, a clearer understanding of why and how students choose universities is more important to help universities develop their marketing strategies. This paper investigates the reasons for pursuing higher education and the key factors influencing their decision to study at university. This paper also considers the issue of whether the lower fees and reputation of a premier university is adequate to attract the best students. The data from a sample of 1st-year undergraduate students enrolled in various courses at the University of Malaya were analysed using coherence analysis and logistic regression. The study infers latent factors affecting university choice and uses a model that allows the interaction of these multiple factors. The findings suggest that career prospects and reputation of the University and its programmes were the most important factors in the students’ decision of a place to further studies. Significant others in the life of the student as well as the student’s own desire for personal development are strong influences that lead the student to consider reputation of the University. While the reputation of the University of Malaya is extremely important, the lower fee structure plays an important role in university choice. The university needs to be proactive in recruiting students. The marketing of educational services is important, both to create a favourable image and as well to successfully recruit the best students.


University choice Higher education Student recruitment Competition University reputation 



This research is funded by University of Malaya under Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FS174/2008A).


  1. Al Jamil, M. A., Sarker, M. M., & Abdullah, M. (2012). Students’ choice criteria to select a private university for their higher education in Bangladesh. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(17), 177–185.Google Scholar
  2. An, B. P. (2009). The association between race and college destinations. Social Science Research, 39, 310–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ancheh, K. S. B., Krishnan, A., & Nurtjahja, O. (2007). Evaluative criteria for selection of private universities and colleges in Malaysia. Journal of International Management Studies, 2(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  4. Baharun, R., Awang, Z., & Padlee, S. F. (2011). International students choice criteria for selection of higher learning in Malaysian private universities. African Journal of Business Management, 5(12), 4704–4714.Google Scholar
  5. Biggin, A. (2000). Marketing education: The good, the bad and the unthanked. Education Marketing, 20, 13–15.Google Scholar
  6. Briggs, S. (2006). An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: The case of higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bromley, D. B. (1993). Reputation, image, and impression management. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Bromley, D. B. (2000). Psychological aspects of corporate identity, image, and reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 3, 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bromley, D. B. (2002). Comparing corporate reputations: League tables, quotients, benchmarks, or case studies? Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canterbury, R. (1999). Higher education marketing: A challenge. Journal of College Admission, 165, 22–30.Google Scholar
  11. Carmeli, A. (2005). Perceived external prestige, affective commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Organization Studies, 26, 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coates, D. (1998). Marketing of further and higher education: An equal opportunities perspective. Journal of Higher Education, 22(2), 135–142.Google Scholar
  13. Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26, 1091–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandez, J. L. (2010). An exploratory study of factors influencing the decision of students to study at Universiti Sains Malaysia. Kajian Malaysia, 28(2), 107–136.Google Scholar
  15. Fombrun, C. J., & Van Riel, C. B. M. (2003). Fame and fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Foskett, N., Dyke, M. & Maringe, F. (2003, 11th September). The influence of the school on the decision to participate in learning post-16. Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University.Google Scholar
  17. Gatfield, T., Barker, M., & Graham, P. (1999). Measuring communication impact for university advertising materials. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(2), 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grunig, J.E., & Hung, C F. (2002). The effect of relationships on reputation and reputation on relationships: A cognitive, behavioral study. Paper presented at the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) Educator’s Academy 5th Annual International, Interdisciplinary Public Relations Research Conference, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
  19. Haji Hassan, F., & Mohamad Sheriff, N. (2006). Students’ need recognition for higher education at private colleges in Malaysia: An exploratory perspective. Sunway Academic Journal, 3, 61–71.Google Scholar
  20. Hemsley-Brown, J. V., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hesketh, A. J., & Knight, P. T. (1999). Postgraduates’ choice of programme: Helping universities to market and postgraduates to choose. Studies in Higher Education, 24(2), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hossler, D., & Gallagher, K. S. (1987). Studying student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College and University, 62, 207–221.Google Scholar
  23. Ivy, J. (2008). A new higher education marketing mix: The 7Ps for MBA marketing. International Journal of Management Education, 22(4), 288–299.Google Scholar
  24. James, R., Baldwin, G., & McInnis, C. (1999). Which university? The factors influencing the choices of prospective undergraduates. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
  25. Joseph, M., Mullen, E. W., & Spake, D. (2012). University branding: Understanding students’ choice of an educational institution. Journal of Brand Management, 20(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Judson, K. M., James, J. D., & Aurand, T. W. (2004). Marketing the university to student athletes: Understanding university selection criteria. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karthik, D. & Basant, R. (2004). Empirical Assessment of Coherence in Information Technology firms. Retrieved from
  28. Kaur, S., & Chapman, K. (2008). UM leads in rankings. The Star Online. Retrieved from
  29. Koe, W. L., & Saring, Siti Noraisah. (2012). Factors influencing the foreign undergraduates’ intention to study at Graduate School of a Public University. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 19, 57–68.Google Scholar
  30. Kotler, P. (2004). Marketing management (11th edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Kotler, P., & Fox, K. F. A. (1985). Strategic marketing for educational Institutions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Kusumawati, A., Yanamandram, V. K. & Perera, N. (2010). Exploring student choice criteria for selecting an Indonesian Public University: A preliminary finding. ANZMAC 2010 Doctoral Colloquium (pp. 1–27). Christchurch: ANZMAC.Google Scholar
  33. Lau, S. H. (2009). Higher education marketing concern: Factors influencing Malaysian students’ intention to study at higher educational institutions. Unpublished master’s thesis. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.Google Scholar
  34. Lim, E. S. & Nagaraj, S. (2007). Obstacles to innovation: Evidence from Malaysian manufacturing firms. MPRA Paper No. 18077. Retrieved from
  35. Looker, D. & Lowe, G. S. (2001). Post secondary access and student financial aid in Canada: Current knowledge and research gaps.
  36. Malaysia. (2006). The Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006–2010. Federal Territory of Putrajaya, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  37. Malaysian Qualifications Agency, Malaysia. (2010). SETARA’09. Retrieved from
  38. Malaysian Qualifications Agency, Malaysia. (2012). SETARA’11. Retrieved from
  39. Maringe, F., & Gibbs, P. (2009). Marketing higher education: Theory and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia. (2011). Malaysian higher education statistics 2011. Federal Territory of Putrajaya.Google Scholar
  41. Misran, N., Sahuri, S. N. S., Arsad, N., Hussain, H., Zaki, W. M. D. W., & Abd Aziz, N. (2012). The influence of socio-economic status among matriculation students in selecting university and undergraduate program. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nichols, J., Harris, J., Morgan, E., Clark, K., & Sims, D. (1995). Marketing in higher education: The MBA experience. International Journal of Management Education, 9(2), 31–38.Google Scholar
  43. Padlee, S. F., Kamaruddin, A. R., & Baharun, R. (2010). International students’ choice behavior for higher education at Malaysian private universities. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 2, 202–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paik, S. & Shim, W. (2012).Tracking and college major choices in academic high schools in South Korea. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher: doi: 10.1007/s40299-012-0035-z.
  45. Paramewaran, R., & Glowacka, A. E. (1995). University image: An information processing perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 6(2), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Poo, B. T., Ismail, R., Sulaiman, N., & Othman, N. (2012). Globalization and the factors influencing households’ demand for Higher Education in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 3(6), 269–278.Google Scholar
  47. Rao, H. (1994). The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1985–1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raposo, M., & Alves, H. (2007). A model of university choice: An exploratory approach. Munich personal RePec archive. Retrieved from
  49. Samsinar Md. S., Siti Rahayu H., & Tan, H. S. (2003). An exploratory study of factors influencing the college choice decision of undergraduate students in Malaysia Asia Pacific. Management Review, 8(3), 259–280.Google Scholar
  50. Soutar, G., & Turner, J. (2002). Students’ preferences for university: A conjoint analysis. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(1), 40–45.Google Scholar
  51. Stachowski, C. A. (2011). Educational marketing: A review and implications for supporting practice in tertiary education. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 39(2), 186–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sung, M., & Yang, S.-U. (2008). Toward the model of university image: The influence of brand personality, external prestige, and reputation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20(4), 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor, R., & Darling, J. (1991). Perceptions towards marketing higher education: Do academic disciplines make a difference? In T. Hayes (Ed.), New strategies in higher education marketing. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  54. Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., & Winter, S. (1994). Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Valcano, S., & Vannoni, D. (2003). Diversification strategies and corporate coherence evidence from Italian leading firms. Review of Industrial Organization, 23, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Veloutsou, C., Lewis, J. W., & Paton, R. A. (2004). University selection: Information requirements and importance. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(3), 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wagner, K. & Fard, P.Y. (2009). Factors influencing Malaysian students’ Intention to study at a higher educational institution. Kuala Lumpur: E-Leader.Google Scholar
  58. Wilkins, S., Balakrishnan, M. S., & Huisman, J. (2011). Student Choice in Higher Education: Motivations for choosing to study at an international branch campus. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(5), 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilkins, S., & Huisman, J. (2011). Student recruitment at international branch campuses: Can they compete in the global market? Journal of Studies in International Education, 15, 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang, S.-U. (2007). An integrated model for organization-public relational outcomes, organizational reputation, and their antecedents. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(2), 91–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang, S., & Grunig, J. E. (2005). Decomposing organizational reputation: The effects of organization-public relationship outcomes on cognitive representations of organizations and evaluations of organizational performance. Journal of Communication Management, 9, 305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yusof, M., Ahmad, S. N. B., Tajudin, M. M., & Ravindra, R. (2008). A study of factors influencing the selection of a higher education institution. UNITAR E-Journal, 4(2), 27–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susila Munisamy
    • 1
  • Noor Ismawati Mohd Jaafar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shyamala Nagaraj
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied Statistics, Faculty of Economics and AdministrationUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations