The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 603–617 | Cite as

Answers to Outstanding Questions about Japanese Student ICT Competencies and a Glance into a Mobile Future

  • Thomas Lockley


The seeming dearth of computer literacy skills amongst Japanese university students has caused much academic interest recently (see for example Lockley, JALT CALL J, 7(1):93–103, 2011a; Williams, Stud Humanit Cult, 14:78–91, 2011; Taynton, Teach English Technol, 12(1):3–19, 2012). One thing all these studies have concluded though is that students are actually more proficient than they are perceived to be. Whilst these and other researchers have exposed the mismatch between educator perception and student reality, the factors involved are still not fully understood. The central questions revolve around what students are learning in schools before they come to university and the contribution of educational culture. This article seeks answers to these questions to allow a fuller understanding of why this dissonance and misperception of Japanese students exists and to find ways of dissipating it. It furthermore goes on to look at some possible solutions, including the exciting possibilities presented by mobile learning.


ICT competencies Japanese students CALL Digitalian Digital natives Japanese university Japanese schools Mobile learning 


  1. Aoki, K. (2010). The use of ICT and e-learning in higher education in Japan. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66, 868–872.Google Scholar
  2. Aspinall, R. (2006). Using the paradigm of ‘small cultures’ to explain policy failure in the case of foreign language education in Japan. Japan Forum, 18(2), 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrs, K. (2011). Mobility in learning: The feasibility of encouraging language learning on smartphones. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2(3), 228–233.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 231–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, M., Castellano, J., Hughes, E., & Worth, A. (2012). Integration of iPads into a Japanese university English language curriculum. The JALT CALL Journal, 8(3), 193–205.Google Scholar
  7. Crowe, A. (2007). Learning to teach with mobile technology: A teacher educator’s journey. In M. van’t Hooft & K. Swan (Eds.), Ubiquitous computing in education (pp. 127–144). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Gobel, P., & Kano, M. (2012). Teachers’ use of technology at the university level. Paper presented at GLoCALL 2012, Beijing, Peoples’ Republic of China.Google Scholar
  9. Hemmi, C. (2006). ‘Ganbarism’, an art in the craft of collaborative learning. IATEFL Voices, 187, 5–6.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation students: Agency and choice and the new technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 344–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20(1), 14406. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14406.Google Scholar
  12. Kikuchi, K., & Otsuka, T. (2008). Investigating the use of social networking services in Japanese EFL classrooms. The JALT CALL Journal, 4(1), 40–52.Google Scholar
  13. Kobayashi, K., & Little, A. (2011). Learner perceptions on the usefulness of a blended learning EFL program. The JALT CALL Journal, 7(1), 103–117.Google Scholar
  14. Kondo, M., Ishikawa, Y., Smith, C., Sakamoto, K., Shimomura, H., & Wada, N. (2012). Mobile assisted language learning in university EFL courses in Japan: Developing attitudes and skills for self-regulated learning. ReCALL, 24(2), 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koole, M. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 25–47). Edmonton: AU Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kyodo. (2011, June 29). Japan fourth in digital literacy test. The Japan Times. Retrieved June 25, 2012 from
  17. Langdon, C. (2011). Good technology does not necessarily equal good pedagogy—an investigation into the educational efficacy of technology in EFL. Studies in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 21, 21–37.Google Scholar
  18. Lockley, T. (2011a). Japanese students’ experience of ICT and other technology prior to university: A survey. The JALT CALL Journal, 7(1), 93–103.Google Scholar
  19. Lockley, T. (2011b). Pre-university experience of ICT and self-access learning in Japan. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2(3), 182–194.Google Scholar
  20. Lockley, T., & Promnitz-Hayashi, L. (2012). Japanese University students’ CALL attitudes, aspirations and motivations. CALL-EJ online, 13(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  21. MacLean, G., & Elwood, J. (2009). Digital natives, learner perceptions and the use of ICT. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 156–179). Hershey: IGI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). (2006). Open image in new window [The results of a survey on the current situation of ICT in schools]. Retrieved June 15, 2012 from
  23. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). (2010). Open image in new window (Promotion of Private Schools). Retrieved June 15, 2012 from
  24. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). (2011a). Five proposals and specific measures for developing proficiency in English for international communication. Retrieved May 17, 2012 from
  25. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). (2011b). Survey results of public junior high schools and combined junior high and high schools. Retrieved July 17, 2012 from
  26. Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2010). OECD key ICT indicators. Retrieved May 29, 2012 from,3343,en_2649_34449_33987543_1_1_1_1,00.html.
  27. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 79–102.Google Scholar
  29. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prensky, M. (2011). Digital wisdom and Homo sapiens. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives (pp. 15–29). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Rohlen, T., & LeTendre, G. (1998). Teaching and learning in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Seliger, H., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Stockwell, G. (2008). Investigating learner preparedness for and usage patterns of mobile learning. ReCALL, 20(3), 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95–110.Google Scholar
  35. Stockwell, G. (2012). Working with constraints in mobile learning: A response to balance. Language Learning and Technology, 16(3), 24–31.Google Scholar
  36. Takahashi, T. (2007). De-westernizing media studies: A Japanese perspective. Global Media and Communication, 3, 330–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Takahashi, T. (2011). Japanese youth and mobile media. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives (pp. 67–82). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Taynton, K. (2012). The net generation in Japan: A survey of internet behaviours, ability and access of students aged 13–21. Teaching English with Technology, 12(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
  39. Williams, V. (2011). Digital divide among “Digital Natives”. Studies in Humanities and Cultures, 14, 78–91.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kanda University of International StudiesChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations