The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 301–311 | Cite as

School Leadership in ICT Implementation: Perspectives from Singapore

Article

Abstract

Singapore has implemented two Masterplans for Information Communication Technology (ICT) in education over the last decade. This article examines Singapore teachers’ perspectives of how leadership for ICT implementation in schools is distributed among leaders, by means of a survey conducted in 2007. The study found that transformational and instructional leadership are perceived to be distributed among multiple leaders including Principal, Heads of Technology, and Heads of Subject. Heads of Technology are viewed as performing both transformational and instructional leadership activities more frequently than the Principal or the Subject Heads. The transformational leadership and instructional leadership performed have a significant effect on the amount of extra effort teachers put into their use of ICT.

Keywords

Information communication technology Distributed leadership Transformational leadership Instructional leadership Empirical paper 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Learning Sciences Laboratory at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

References

  1. Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 49–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 231–272.Google Scholar
  3. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Introduction. In B. M. Bass & B. J. Avolio (Eds.), Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership (pp. 1–9). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, C. K. (1996). Schools, technology, and educational leadership: Framework for change. NASSP Bulletin, 80, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bridges, J. W. (2003). Principal influence: Sustaining a vision for powerful new forms of learning using technology (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(6), 1915.Google Scholar
  6. Bush, T., Glover, D. (2003). School leadership: Concepts and evidence. www.ncsl.org.uk/literaturereviews.
  7. Creighton, T. (2003). The principal as technology leader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Feldner, L. M. C. (2003). The role of the school administrators in supporting teachers in the integration of educational technology into K-12 classrooms. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, University Of North Dakota, Dakota.Google Scholar
  9. Fidler, B. (1997). School leadership: Some key ideas. School Leadership & Management, 17(1), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal. Journal o Educational Administration, 41, 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2003). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 228–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (Vol. 2, pp. 653–693). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). Instructional leadership in school contexts. In W. Greenfield (Ed.), Instructional leadership: Concepts, issues and controversies. Lexington, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. Harris, A. (2005). Distributed leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 160–172). Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  17. Heck, G. J., & Wallace, B. (1999). Preparing to implement learning outcomes in technology: Best practices for Alberta School jurisdictions. Alberta, Canada: Alberta Department of Education, Edmonton.Google Scholar
  18. Heller, M. F., & Firestone, W. A. (1995). Who’s in charge here? Sources of leadership for change in eight schools. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hughes, M., & Zachariah, S. (2001). An investigation into the relationship between effective administrative leadership styles and the use of technology [Electronic Version]. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning (Vol. 5). Retrieved May 19, from http://www.Acs.Ucalgary.Ca/~Iejll.
  20. Inkster, C. D. (1998). Technology leadership in elementary school principals: A comparative case study, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kincaid, T., & Feldner, L. (2002). Leadership for technology integration: The role of principals and mentors. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 75–80.Google Scholar
  23. Kirkman, C. (2000). A model for the effective management of ICT development in schools derived from 6 contrasting case studies. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M., & Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1987). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Langran, E. (2006). Technology leadership: Principals and technology coordinators working together. In C. Crawford, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2006 (pp. 2108–2113). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
  27. Lashway, L. (2003). Distributed leadership. Research Roundup, 19(4), 1–4.Google Scholar
  28. Lawson, T., & Comber, C. (2003). School leadership and ICT: Management for change. In M. Brundrett & I. Terrell (Eds.), Learning to lead in the secondary school. London: Routledge Farmer.Google Scholar
  29. Leithwood, K., & Duke, D. L. (1999). A century’s quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 45–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). Transformational leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 31–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  31. Lim, C. P., et al. (2004). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: Pedagogical and policy implications—final report. Singapore: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  32. Looi, C. K., Jonassen, D. K., & Ikeda, M. (2005). Towards sustainable and scalable educational innovations informed by the learning science. Washington, DC: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lucas, S. E., & Valentine, J. W. (2002). Transformational leadership: Principals, leadership teams, and school culture. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  34. Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martinez, M. A. (2002). Principal behavior that influence teacher use of technology in Massachusetts. Providence, RI: Johnson and Wales University.Google Scholar
  36. Ministry of Education Singapore. (2003). Framework paper: Building school leadership capacity. Singapore: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  37. Ministry of Education Singapore. (2005). Executive Summary of MP2 Review Report. Singapore: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  38. Ministry of Education Singapore. (2006). Educational Digest Statistics 2006. Retrieved December 1, 2007, from http://www.Moe.Gov.Sg/Esd/Factsheet%202006.Pdf.
  39. Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: A review of literature. Educational Management and Administration, 31(4), 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ng, W. L. (2004). Transformational Leadership and Integration of Information and Communications Technology in Teaching: Pre-service Teachers’ Perspectives. In Proceedings of global conference on excellence in education and training, May 20–22, 2004.Google Scholar
  41. Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 413–443.Google Scholar
  42. Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). The challenge of instructional change: Two teachers’ stories. In J. H. Sandholtz et al (Eds.), Teaching with Technology: Creating student-centered classrooms (pp 16–33). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  43. Schiller, J. (2003). Working with ICT perceptions of Australian principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sheppard, B. (1996). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 325–344.Google Scholar
  45. Shuldman, M. (2004). Superintendent conceptions of institutional conditions that impact teacher technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 319–343.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, J. E. (2004). Distributed Instructional Leadership and Teachers’ Perceptions of and Motivation for Instructional Improvement. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, University Of Michigan, Michigan.Google Scholar
  47. Venezky, R. L. & Davis, C. (2002). Quo Vademus? The Transformation of Schooling in a Networked World. Retrieved June 17, 2007, from http://www.Oecd.Org/Dataoecd/48/20/2073054.Pdf.
  48. Wagner, D., et al. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of ICT in education projects: A handbook for developing countries. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
  49. Weiss, C. H., & Cambone, J. (2000). Principals, shared decision making, and school reform. In Jossey-Bass (Ed.), Educational leadership (pp. 366–389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  50. Yee, D. L. (2000). Images of school principals’ information and communications technology leadership. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yuen, H. K., Fox, B., & Law, N. (2004). Curriculum innovations and multi-level e-leadership requirements: Putting research into practice. Asia-Pacific Cybereducation Journal, 1(1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of EducationSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations