Skip to main content
Log in

Aortic Augmentation Index is Dependent on Bodyside in Healthy Young Subjects

  • Original article
  • Published:
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Aortic augmentation index (AIx) is a commonly used measure to evaluate the arterial stiffness of large elastic arteries. It has been used as an indicator for cardiovascular risk in clinical practice.

Aim

To evaluate the difference in the aortic AIx assessed from the left and the right hand in a group of healthy young adults using SphygmoCor and Arteriograph devices.

Methods

32 subjects were enrolled in this study (27 ± 7 years), 16 male and 16 female volunteers participated. Equally, half of the gender groups were left-handed and another half right-handed.

Results

It was found that the aortic AIx values assessed from the pressure waveforms of the right and the left hand are different and significantly higher in the left hand. Using a SphygmoCor device, the mean difference between the aortic AIx values from the right and the left hand among the whole study group was found − 4.78 ± 4.31% and using an Arteriograph the aortic AIx values were − 3.92 ± 3.90%. Aortic AIx values assessed from the right and the left hand were linearly related to each other for both devices. Moreover, it was found that the values of the aortic.

Conclusions

AIx are independent of the subject’s handedness. It has to be pointed out that subjects who cannot be subjected to assessment of the aortic AIx from one side of the body could have different AIx values estimated from the recorded pressure waveform from the other bodyside.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herrington W, Lacey B, Sherliker P, Armitage J, Lewington S. Epidemiology of atherosclerosis and the potential to reduce the global burden of atherothrombotic disease. Circ Res. 2016;118:535–46. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Durham AL, Speer MY, Scatena M, Giachelli CM, Shanahan CM. Role of smooth muscle cells in vascular calcification: implications in atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness. Cardiovasc Res. 2018;114(4):590–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvy010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Butlin M, Avolio AP. Age-related changes in the mechanical properties of arteries. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 37–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03970-1_3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Low Wang CC, Hess CN, Hiatt WR, Goldfine AB. Clinical update: cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus—mechanisms, management, and clinical considerations. Circulation. 2016;133(24):2459–502. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.116.022194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Schiffrin EL, Lipman ML, Mann JF. Chronic kidney disease, effects on the cardiovascular system. Circulation. 2007;116(1):85–97. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.678342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. García-Ortiz L, Recio-Rodríguez JI, Martín-Cantera C, Cabrejas-Sánchez A, Gómez-Arranz A, González-Viejo N, Nicolás EIS, Patino-Alonso MC, Gómez-Marcos MA. Physical exercise, fitness and dietary pattern and their relationship with circadian blood pressure pattern, augmentation index and endothelial dysfunction biological markers: EVIDENT study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:233. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Betge S, Kretzschmar D, Figulla HR, Lichtenauer M, Jung C. Predictive value of the augmentation index derived vascular age in patients with newly diagnosed atherosclerosis. Heart Vessels. 2017;32:252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-016-0868-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McEniery CM, Hall YR, Qasem A, Wilkinson IB, Cockcroft JR. Normal vascular aging: differential effects on wave reflection and aortic pulse wave velocity: the anglo-cardiff collaborative trial (ACCT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(9):1753–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fantin F, Mattocks A, Bulpitt CJ, Banya W, Rajkumar C. Is augmentation index a good measure of vascular stiffness in the elderly? Age Ageing. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afl115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilkinson IB, MacCallum H, Flint L, Cockcroft JR, Newby DE, Webb DJ. The influence of heart rate on augmentation index and central arterial pressure in humans. J Physiol. 2000;525:263–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Butlin M, Qasem A. Large artery stiffness assessment using sphygmocor technology. Pulse. 2017;4(4):180–92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000452448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rajzer MW, Wojciechowska W, Klocek M, Palka I, Brzozowska-Kiszka M, Kawecka-Jaszcz K. Comparison of aortic pulse wave velocity measured by three techniques: Complior, SphygmoCor and Arteriograph. J Hypertens. 2008;26(10):2001–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32830a4a25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Horváth IG, Németh A, Lenkey Z, Alessandri N, Tufano F, Kis P et al. Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2010;28(10):2068–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833c8a1a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kohara K, Tabara Y, Yamazaki M, Kobayashi T, Miyawaki Y, Miki T. Variability of radial augmentation index including right–left difference. J Hypertens. 2006;25(2):168.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang MH, Yoo JK, Kim HK, Hwang CL, Mackay K, Hemstreet O et al. Validity and reliability of aortic pulse wave velocity and augmentation index determined by the new cuff-based SphygmoCor Xcel. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;28(8):475–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2013.144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the study participants for their time and effort.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Einstein.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The research was funded partly by the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research under institutional research financing IUT 19-2 and by Estonian Centre of Excellence in IT (EXCITE) funded by the European Regional Development Fund.

Conflict of interest

All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study has been approved by the Tallinn Ethics Committee on Medical Research at the National Institute for Health Development, Estonia.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Einstein, S., Pilt, K., Palmar, M. et al. Aortic Augmentation Index is Dependent on Bodyside in Healthy Young Subjects. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 26, 375–382 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-019-00335-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-019-00335-3

Keywords:

Navigation