Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 185–192 | Cite as

Engineering Insights for Multiplexed Real-Time Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification (NASBA): Implications for Design of Point-of-Care Diagnostics

Short Communication



Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) offers huge potential for low-cost, point-of-care (POC) diagnostic devices, but has been limited by high false-positive rates and the challenges of primer design.


We offer a systematic analysis of NASBA design with a view toward expanding its applicability.


We examine the parameters that effect dimer formations, and we provide a framework for designing NASBA primers that will reduce false-positive results and make NASBA suitable for more POC diagnostic applications. Then we compare three different oligonucleotide sets to examine (1) the inhibitory effect of dimer formations, (2) false positives with poorly designed primers, and (3) the effect of beacon target location during real-time NASBA. The required T7 promoter sequence adversely affects the reaction kinetics, although the common abridged sequence can improve kinetics without sacrificing accuracy.


We demonstrate that poorly designed primers undergo real-time exponential amplification in the absence of target RNA, resulting in false positives with a time to half of the peak value (t1/2) of 50 min compared to 45 min for true positives. Redesigning the oligonucleotides to avoid inhibitory dimers eliminated false positives and reduced the true positive t1/2 by 10 min. Finally, we confirm the efficacy of two molecular beacon design schemes and discuss their multiplexing utility in two clinical scenarios.


This study provides a pathway for using NASBA in developing POC diagnostic assays.

Supplementary material

40291_2013_29_MOESM1_ESM.docx (83 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 83 kb)


  1. 1.
    Compton J. Nucleic-acid sequence-based amplification. Nature. 1991;350(6313):91–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Collins RA, Ko LS, So KL, Ellis T, Lau LT, Yu AC. Detection of highly pathogenic and low pathogenic avian influenza subtype H5 (Eurasian lineage) using NASBA. J Virol Methods. 2002;103(2):213–25. (Epub 2002/05/15).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collins RA, Ko LS, Fung KY, Lau LT, Xing J, Yu AC. A method to detect major serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;297(2):267–74. (Epub 2002/09/19).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lau LT, Reid SM, King DP, Lau AM, Shaw AE, Ferris NP, et al. Detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA). Vet Microbiol. 2008;126(1–3):101–10. (Epub 2007/08/31).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chantratita W, Pongtanapisit W, Piroj W, Srichunrasmi C, Seesuai S. Development and comparison of the real-time amplification based methods—NASBA-Beacon, RT-PCR taqman and RT-PCR hybridization probe assays–for the qualitative detection of sars coronavirus. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004;35(3):623–9. (Epub 2005/02/04).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keightley MC, Sillekens P, Schippers W, Rinaldo C, George KS. Real-time NASBA detection of SARS-associated coronavirus and comparison with real-time reverse transcription-PCR. J Med Virol. 2005;77(4):602–8. (Epub 2005/10/29).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lanciotti RS, Kerst AJ. Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assays for rapid detection of West Nile and St. Louis encephalitis viruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(12):4506–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bohmer A, Schildgen V, Lusebrink J, Ziegler S, Tillmann RL, Kleines M, et al. Novel application for isothermal nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA). J Virol Methods. 2009;158(1–2):199–201. (Epub 2009/05/12).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vandamme AM, Schmit JC, Van Dooren S, Van Laethem K, Gobbers E, Kok W, et al. Quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma: comparable results with the NASBA HIV-1 RNA QT and the AMPLICOR HIV monitor test. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1996;13(2):127–39. (Epub 1996/10/01).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vandamme AM, Van Dooren S, Kok W, Goubau P, Fransen K, Kievits T, et al. Detection of HIV-1 RNA in plasma and serum samples using the NASBA amplification system compared to RNA-PCR. J Virol Methods. 1995;52(1–2):121–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schneider P, Wolters L, Schoone G, Schallig H, Sillekens P, Hermsen R, et al. Real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification is more convenient than real-time PCR for quantification of Plasmodium falciparum. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(1):402–5. (Epub 2005/01/07).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dyer JR, Gilliam BL, Eron JJ, Grosso L, Cohen MS, Fiscus SA. Quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in cell free seminal plasma: comparison of NASBA™ with Amplicor™ reverse transcription-PCR amplification and correlation with quantitative culture. J Virol Methods. 1996;60(2):161–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luebke KJ, Balog RP, Garner HR. Prioritized selection of oligodeoxyribonucleotide probes for efficient hybridization to RNA transcripts. Nucl Acids Res. 2003;31(2):750–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guatelli JC, Whitfield KM, Kwoh DY, Barringer KJ, Richman DD, Gingeras TR. Isothermal, in vitro amplification of nucleic acids by a multienzyme reaction modeled after retroviral replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1990;87(5):1874–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deiman B, van Aarle P, Sillekens P. Characteristics and applications of nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA). Mol Biotechnol. 2002;20(2):163–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCalla SE, Ong C, Sarma A, Opal SM, Artenstein AW, Tripathi A. A simple method for amplifying RNA targets (SMART). J Mol Diagn. 2012;14(4):328–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ong C, Tai W, Sarma A, Opal SM, Artenstein AW, Tripathi A. Ligation with Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification. J Mol Diagn. 2012;14(3):206–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Markham NR. DI-Nucleic Acid hybridization and melting prediction. The UNAFold Web Server. University at Albany: The RNA Institute College of Arts and Sciences. 2011. Accessed June 2011.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Owczarzy R, Moreira BG, You Y, Behlke MA, Walder JA. Predicting stability of DNA duplexes in solutions containing magnesium and monovalent cations. Biochemistry-Us. 2008;47(19):5336–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth Morabito
    • 1
  • Clay Wiske
    • 2
  • Anubhav Tripathi
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Biomedical EngineeringBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  2. 2.School of Engineering and Division of Biology and Medicine, and the Warren Alpert School of MedicineBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations