Advertisement

Pharmaceutical Medicine

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 369–371 | Cite as

Including Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnoses in ICD-11 May Not Advance the Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapies

  • Stewart GearyEmail author
Commentary
  • 6 Downloads

Introduction

The inclusion of a traditional medicine chapter based on Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in the 11th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) has elicited a range of reactions, from condemnation that the World Health Organization (WHO) is embracing the “integration of quackery with real medicine” [1] to expressions of hopeful envy from practitioners of Ayurvedic medicine [2]. As a specialist in pharmaceutical medicine, I do not consider myself a neutral party in any debate about the role of TCM within medical care or drug development, but living in Tokyo, where my home is a few blocks from a popular TCM pharmacy, I appreciate that there is a substantial use of these therapies especially in Asia. I would like to suggest that the addition of Chapter 26 on TCM in ICD-11 is unlikely to have the effects described by either its advocates or opponents.

The Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Codes in the International Classification of Diseases 11th...

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

No sources of funding were used to support the writing of this commentary.

Conflict of interest

Stewart Geary is an employee of Eisai Co., Ltd but has no financial interest for or against Traditional Chinese Medicine.

References

  1. 1.
    Gorski D. ICD-11: a triumph of the “integration” of quackery with real medicine. Science-Based Medicine; 2018. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/icd-11-a-triumph-of-the-integration-of-quackery-with-real-medicine/. Accessed 3 Aug 2019.
  2. 2.
    Singh RH, Rastogi S. WHO ICD-11 showcasing of traditional medicine: lesson from a lost opportunity. Ann Ayurvedic Med. 2018;7(3–4):66–71.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) information sheet. https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/factsheet/en/. Accessed 3 Aug 2019.
  4. 4.
    Lu W, Dean-Clower E, Doherty-Gilman A, Rosenthal DS. The value of acupuncture in cancer care. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2008;22(4):631–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson L. ICD-11: hurry up and wait. ICD10 Monitor. https://www.icd10monitor.com/icd-11-hurry-up-and-wait. Accessed 3 Aug 2019.
  6. 6.
    Liu SH, Chuang WC, Lam W, Jiang Z, Cheng YC. Safety surveillance of traditional Chinese medicine: current and future. Drug Saf. 2015;38(2):117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xiao X, Tang J, Mao Y, et al. Guidance for the clinical evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine-induced liver injury. Issued by China Food and Drug Administration. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2019;9(3):648–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lam WC, Lyi A, Bian Z. ICD-11: impact on traditional Chinese medicine and world healthcare systems. Pharm Med. 2019;33(5):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-019-00295-y (page numbers to be added at issue build).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eisai Co., Ltd.TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations