Advertisement

Authors’ Reply to Tenan et al.: “A Method to Stop Analyzing Random Error and Start Analyzing Differential Responders to Exercise”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 49.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Tenan MS, et al. Comment on: “A method to stop analyzing random error and start analyzing differential responders to exercise”. Sports Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01249-9.

  2. 2.

    Dankel SJ, Loenneke JP. A method to stop analyzing random error and start analyzing differential responders to exercise. Sports Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01147-0.

  3. 3.

    Atkinson G, Batterham AM. True and false interindividual differences in the physiological response to an intervention. Exp Physiol. 2015;100:577–88.

  4. 4.

    Weir JP. Quantifying test–retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:231–40.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Jeremy P. Loenneke.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflict of Interest

Scott Dankel and Jeremy Loenneke declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dankel, S.J., Loenneke, J.P. Authors’ Reply to Tenan et al.: “A Method to Stop Analyzing Random Error and Start Analyzing Differential Responders to Exercise”. Sports Med (2019) doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01250-2

Download citation