Advertisement

Correction to: Association Between Temporal Spatial Parameters and Overuse Injury History in Runners: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Richard A. BrindleEmail author
  • Jeffrey B. Taylor
  • Coty Rajek
  • Anika Weisbrod
  • Kevin R. Ford
Correction
  • 151 Downloads

1 Corrections to: Sports Medicine  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01207-5

Page 1, Abstract, Results section, lines 17–20: The following sentence, which previously read:

“Healthy runners and those with a history of overuse injury had a similar average stride time (mean difference: − 0.01 s, 95% CI − 0.02 to 0.01 s), contact time (mean difference: 0.00 s, 95% CI 0.00–0.01 s), cadence (mean difference: 0.3 steps per minute (spm), 95% CI − 1.8 to 2.5 spm), and stride length (mean difference 0.00 m, 95% CI − 0.04 to 0.05 m) during running”.

Should read:

“Healthy runners and those with a history of overuse injury had a similar average stride time (mean difference: 0.00 s, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.01 s), contact time (mean difference: 0.00 s, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.01 s), cadence (mean difference: 0.3 steps per minute (spm), 95% CI − 1.8 to 2.5 spm), and stride length (mean difference 0.00 m, 95% CI − 0.05 to 0.05 m) during running”.

Page 4, Figure 1: The text in the ‘Records excluded’ box, which previously read ‘Records excluded (n = 1888)’:
Should read: ‘Records excluded (n = 1887)’.

Page 6, Section 3.2, column 1, lines 6–9: The following sentence, which previously read:

“Stride time and stride length meta-analyses were composed of 8 and 10 group comparisons and data from 224 and 229 individuals, respectively”.

Should read:

“Stride time and stride length meta-analyses were composed of 8 and 9 group comparisons and data from 224 and 206 individuals, respectively”.

Page 6, Section 3.2, column 1, lines 15–22: The following sentence, which previously read:

“Meta-analyses of stride time (mean difference: 0.00 s, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.01 s), contact time (mean difference: 0.00 s, 95% CI 0.00–0.01 s), cadence (mean difference: 0.3 steps per minute (spm), 95% CI − 1.8 to 2.4 spm), and stride length (mean difference 0.00 m, 95% CI − 0.04 to 0.05 m) during running revealed no differences between the pooled injured and uninjured groups of runners (p > 0.05) (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5)”.

Should read:

“Meta-analyses of stride time (mean difference: 0.00 s, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.01 s), contact time (mean difference: 0.00 s, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.01 s), cadence (mean difference: 0.3 steps per minute [spm], 95% CI − 1.8 to 2.4 spm), and stride length (mean difference 0.00 m, 95% CI − 0.05 to 0.05 m) during running revealed no differences between the pooled injured and uninjured groups of runners (p > 0.05) (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5)”.

Page 7, Table 2, Prospective design studies section, Bredeweg et al. [20] row. The entry in the ‘Injury’ column, which previously read:

“Lower extremity injury in last 3 months”.

Should read:

“Injury to lower extremity or back”.

Page 7, Table 2, Prospective design studies section, Bredeweg et al. [19] row. The entry in the ‘Injury’ column, which previously read:

“Lower extremity injury in last 3 months”.

Should read:

“Injury to lower extremity or back”.

Page 7, Table 2, Cross-sectional design studies, Willson et al. [30] row. The entry in the ‘TSP variables’ column, which previously read:

“Stride length, contact time”.

Should read:

“Step length, contact time”.

Page 8, column 2, Section 4.4, lines 3–5: The following sentence, which previously read:

“Stride length during running was similar between injured and uninjured groups of runners in all studies included in this meta-analysis [23, 26, 29, 30]”.

Should read:

“Stride length during running was similar between injured and uninjured groups of runners in all studies included in this meta-analysis [23, 26, 29]”.

Page 9, Figure 2: The following figure, which previously read:

Page 9, Figure 2: The following figure caption, which previously read:

Fig. 2 Forest plot of stride time (s) during running”.

Should read:

Fig. 2 Forest plot of stride time (s) during running. SD standard deviation, IV inverse variance, CI confidence interval, PS preferred speed, SS standard speed”.

Page 9, Figure 3: The following figure, which previously read:

Page 9, Figure 3: The following figure caption, which previously read:

Fig. 3 Forest plot of contact time (s) during running”.

Should read:

Fig. 3 Forest plot of contact time (s) during running. SD standard deviation, IV inverse variance, CI confidence interval, PS preferred speed, SS standard speed”.

Page 9, Figure 4: The following figure, which previously read:

Page 9, Figure 4: The following figure caption, which previously read:

Fig. 4 Forest plot of cadence (steps per minute) during running”.

Should read:

Fig. 4 Forest plot of cadence (steps per minute) during running. SD standard deviation, IV inverse variance, CI confidence interval”.

Page 10, Figure 5: The following figure, which previously read:

Page 10, Figure 5: The following figure caption, which previously read:

Fig. 5 Forest plot of stride length (m) during running”.

Should read:

Fig. 5 Forest plot of stride length (m) during running. SD standard deviation, IV inverse variance, CI confidence interval, PS preferred speed, SS standard speed”.

The original article has been corrected.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical TherapyHigh Point UniversityHigh PointUSA
  2. 2.Department of Exercise ScienceHigh Point UniversityHigh PointUSA

Personalised recommendations