Acute Effects of Resistance Exercise on Cognitive Function in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review with Multilevel Meta-Analysis
Recent research has revealed a beneficial impact of chronic resistance exercise (RE) on brain function. However, it is unclear as to whether RE is also effective in an acute setting.
To investigate the immediate effects of a single RE session on cognitive performance in healthy adults.
A multilevel meta-analysis with random effects meta-regression model was used to pool the standardized mean differences (SMD) between RE and no-exercise (NEX) as well as between RE and aerobic exercise (AE). In addition to global cognitive function, effects on reported sub-domains (inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, working memory, attention) were examined.
Twelve trials with fair methodological quality (PEDro scale) were identified. Compared to NEX, RE had a positive effect on global cognition (SMD: 0.56, 95% CI 0.22–0.90, p = 0.004), but was not superior to AE (SMD: − 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to − 0.20, p = 0.06). Regarding cognitive sub-domains, RE, compared to NEX, improved inhibitory control (SMD: 0.73, 95% CI 0.21–1.26, p = 0.01) and cognitive flexibility (SMD: 0.36, 95% CI 0.17–0.55, p = 0.004). In contrast, working memory (SMD: 0.35, 95% CI − 0.05 to 0.75, p = 0.07) and attention (SMD: 0.79, 95% CI − 0.42 to 2.00, p = 0.16) remained unaffected. No significant differences in sub-domains were found between RE and AE (p > 0.05).
RE appears to be an appropriate method to immediately enhance cognitive function in healthy adults. Further studies clearly elucidating the impact of effect modifiers such as age, training intensity, or training duration are warranted.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.
Conflict of interest
Jan Wilke, Florian Giesche, Kristina Klier, Lutz Vogt, Eva Herrmann, and Winfried Banzer declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.
- 3.Thomas AG, Dennis A, Bandettini PA, et al. The effects of aerobic activity on brain structure. Front Psychol. 2012;3.Google Scholar
- 4.Liu PZ, Nusslock R. Exercise-mediated neurogenesis in the hippocampus via BDNF. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:450.Google Scholar
- 6.Howland JG, Wang YT. Chapter 8 Synaptic plasticity in learning and memory: stress effects in the hippocampus. Essence of memory. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. p. 145–58.Google Scholar
- 14.Firth J, Stubbs B, Rosenbaum S, et al. Aerobic exercise improves cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;43:546–56.Google Scholar
- 20.Loprinzi PD, Frith E, Edwards MK. Resistance exercise and episodic memory function: a systematic review. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018;8:e76301.Google Scholar
- 28.Horsley T, Dingwall O, Sampson M. Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;73:505.Google Scholar
- 29.Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83:713–21.Google Scholar
- 30.Foley CF, Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, et al. Estimates of quality and reliability with the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale to assess the methodology of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Phys Ther. 2006;86(6):817–24.Google Scholar
- 32.Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1993.Google Scholar
- 35.Fisher Z, Tipton E. Robumeta. an r package for robust variance estimation in meta-analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02220.
- 43.Tsai C, Wang C, Pan C, et al. Executive function and endocrinological responses to acute resistance exercise. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:283.Google Scholar
- 52.Tsai C, Wang C, Pan C, et al. The effects of long-term resistance exercise on the relationship between neurocognitive performance and GH, IGF-1, and homocysteine levels in the elderly. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:471.Google Scholar