The Relationship Between Motor Competence and Physical Fitness from Early Childhood to Early Adulthood: A Meta-Analysis
Motor competence and physical fitness are important factors for promoting positive trajectories of health over time. In 2008, Stodden and colleagues developed a model that discussed the role of both factors in physical activity. Furthermore, the authors hypothesized that the relationship between motor competence and physical fitness is reciprocal and changes over time.
The aim of the present meta-analysis was to synthesize the evidence on the relationship between motor competence and components of physical fitness from early childhood to early adulthood and the potential influence of age.
Scientific databases Web of Science and PubMed were used for the literature search. German- as well as English-language studies were included that assessed typically developing children. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, 93 studies between 2005 and June 2018 were screened in full. Nineteen studies comprising of 32 samples, 87 single data points from 15,984 participants aged 4.5–20.4 years (Mage = 11.44, SD = 4.77) were included in the analysis.
A random effects model was conducted for the meta-regression with age as moderator variable. The relationship between motor competence and physical fitness was moderate to large (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) after controlling for multiple effects, including dependent samples and small sample sizes in the quantitative synthesis. Additionally, age was a small significant positive moderator of the effect size.
Conclusions and Implications
The findings provide support for a moderate to large positive relationship between motor competence and physical fitness that strengthens with increasing age. However, the results also indicate that there may be an overlap in content between motor competence and physical fitness assessments, which warrants further investigation. More research is also needed to assess similarities and differences in terms of the construct structures.
We would like to thank Jan Beck and David Niehues for their help in the data screening process.
Dr. Till Utesch conceptualized the study, coordinated and supervised data collection, carried out the data analyses, drafted and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr. Farid Bardid conceptualized the study, contributed to drafting and revising the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Prof. Dr. Dirk Büsch critically conceptualized the study, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Prof. Dr. Bernd Strauss conceptualized the study, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.
Compliance with ethical standards
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on the Open Science Framework (OSF) (http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P36RQ or https://osf.io/p36rq). This includes the final data file and R script used to conduct the meta-analysis, and the BibTex files that cover all records retrieved from the literature search.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
No financial support was received for the conduct of this review or preparation of this manuscript.
- 1.WHO. Facts and figures on childhood obesity. 2014. http://www.who.int/end-childhood-obesity/facts/en. Accessed 9 June 2017.
- 2.WHO. Ending Childhood Obesity. 2016. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204176/1/9789241510066_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 9 June 2017.
- 3.WHO. Physical Activity. 2017. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs385/en/. Accessed 9 June 2017.
- 7.Utesch T, Bardid F. Motor competence. In: Hackfort D, Schinke R, Strauss B, editors. Dictionary of sport psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019.Google Scholar
- 8.Bardid F, Utesch T, Lenoir M. Investigating the construct of motor competence in middle childhood. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2017;39:51–2.Google Scholar
- 24.Burton AW, Rodgerson RW. New perspectives on the assessment of movement skills and motor abilities. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2001;18:347–65.Google Scholar
- 27.Burton AW, Miller DE. Movement skill assessment. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1998.Google Scholar
- 28.Gallahue DL, Ozmun JC, Goodway JD. Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents, adults. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012.Google Scholar
- 31.Caspersen CJ, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100:126–31.Google Scholar
- 42.Vedul-Kjelsås V, Sigmundsson H, Stensdotter a. K, Haga M. The relationship between motor competence, physical fitness and self-perception in children. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38:394–402.Google Scholar
- 44.Ré AHN, Cattuzzo MT, Henrique R dos S, Stodden DF. Physical characteristics that predict involvement with the ball in recreational youth soccer. J Sports Sci. 2016;34:1716–22.Google Scholar
- 46.Hedges LV, Tipton E, Johnson MC. Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. 2010;1:39–65.Google Scholar
- 48.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1988.Google Scholar
- 49.Lenhard W, Lenhard A. Calculation of effect sizes [Internet]. Dettelbach; 2016. https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2018.
- 50.Carter EC, Hilgard J, Schönbrodt FD, Gervais WM. Correcting for bias in psychology: a comparison of meta-analytic methods. OSF pre-print. 2017; https://osf.io/rf3ys/. Accessed 20 Jan 2018.
- 51.R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Statistical Software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.Google Scholar
- 53.Fisher Z, Tipton E. Robumeta: Robust variance meta-regression. R package version 1.6. 2015.Google Scholar
- 54.Bardid F, Huyben F, Deconinck FJ, De Martelaer K, Seghers J, Lenoir M. Convergent and divergent validity between the KTK and MOT 4-6 motor tests in early childhood. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2016;33:33–47.Google Scholar
- 56.Kiphard EJ, Schilling F. Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder [Body Coordination Test]. Weinheim: Beltz Test; 1974.Google Scholar
- 57.Kiphard EJ, Schilling F. Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder [Body Coordination Test]. Weinheim: Beltz Test GmbH; 2007.Google Scholar
- 58.Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett A. Movement assessment battery for children. 2nd ed. London: Harcourt Assessment; 2007.Google Scholar
- 60.Haywood KM, Getchell N. Life span motor development. 6th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2014.Google Scholar