Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 48, Issue 12, pp 2859–2867 | Cite as

Modeling the Benefits of Cooperative Drafting: Is There an Optimal Strategy to Facilitate a Sub-2-Hour Marathon Performance?

  • Wouter Hoogkamer
  • Kristine L. Snyder
  • Christopher J. Arellano
Original Research Article

Abstract

Background

During a race, competing cyclists often cooperate by alternating between leading and drafting positions. This approach allows them to maximize velocity by using the energy saved while drafting, a technique to reduce the overall drag by exploiting the leader’s slipstream. We have argued that a similar cooperative drafting approach could benefit elite marathon runners in their quest for the sub-2-hour marathon.

Objective

Our aim was to model the effects of various cooperative drafting scenarios on marathon performance by applying the critical velocity concept for intermittent high-intensity running.

Methods

We used the physiological characteristics of the world’s most elite long-distance runners and mathematically simulated the depletion and recovery of their distance capacity when running above and below their critical velocity throughout a marathon.

Results

Our simulations showed that with four of the most elite runners in the world, a 2:00:48 (h:min:s) marathon is possible, a whopping 2 min faster than the current world record. We also explored the possibility of a sub-2-hour marathon using multiple runners with the physiological characteristics of Eliud Kipchoge, arguably the best marathon runner of our time. We found that a team of eight Kipchoge-like runners could break the sub-2-hour marathon barrier.

Conclusion

In the context of cooperative drafting, we show that the best team strategy for improving marathon performance time can be optimized using a mathematical model that is based on the physiological characteristics of each athlete.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Rodger Kram and Shalaya Kipp for helpful feedback and comments regarding an earlier version of this manuscript. We also thank Andrew Jones and Philip Skiba for additional clarifications of their models.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflict of interest

Wouter Hoogkamer, Kristine L. Snyder, and Christopher J. Arellano declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article.

Supplementary material

40279_2018_991_MOESM1_ESM.docx (755 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 755 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    International Association of Athletics Federations. Competition rules 2018–2019. Monaco: International Association of Athletics Federations; 2017.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoogkamer W, Kram R, Arellano CJ. How biomechanical improvements in running economy could break the 2-hour marathon barrier. Sports Med. 2017;47:1739–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broker JP, Kyle CR, Burke ER. Racing cyclist power requirements in the 4000-m individual and team pursuits. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:1677–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heimans L, Dijkshoorn WR, Hoozemans MJ, de Koning JJ. Optimizing the team for required power during track cycling team pursuit. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12:1385–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Prampero PE, Atchou G, Brückner JC, Moia C. The energetics of endurance running. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986;55:259–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joyner MJ. Modeling: optimal marathon performance on the basis of physiological factors. J Appl Physiol. 1991;70:683–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones AM, Vanhatalo A. The ‘critical power’ concept: applications to sports performance with a focus on intermittent high-intensity exercise. Sports Med. 2017;47:65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morton RH, Billat LV. The critical power model for intermittent exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;91:303–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skiba PF, Chidnok W, Vanhatalo A, Jones AM. Modeling the expenditure and reconstitution of work capacity above critical power. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:1526–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hill DW. The critical power concept: a review. Sports Med. 1993;16:237–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poole DC, Burnley M, Vanhatalo A, et al. Critical power: an important fatigue threshold in exercise physiology. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48:2320–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Skiba PF, Fulford J, Clarke DC, et al. Intramuscular determinants of the ability to recover work capacity above critical power. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;115:703–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones AM, Vanhatalo A, Burnley M, et al. Critical power: implications for determination of VO2max and exercise tolerance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1876–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McDermott KS, Hill DW, Forbes MR. Application of the critical power concept to outdoor running [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25:S109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hughson RL, Orok CJ, Staudt LE. A high velocity treadmill running test to assess endurance running potential. Int J Sports Med. 1984;5:23–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vanhatalo A, Doust JH, Burnley M. Determination of critical power using a 3-min all-out cycling test. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:548–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Broxterman RM, Ade CJ, Poole DC, et al. A single test for the determination of parameters of the speed–time relationship for running. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2013;185:380–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brueckner JC, Atchou G, Capelli C, et al. The energy cost of running increases with the distance covered. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991;62:385–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nicol C, Komi PV, Marconnet P. Effects of marathon fatigue on running kinematics and economy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1991;1:195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kyröläinen H, Pullinen T, Candau R, et al. Effects of marathon running on running economy and kinematics. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;82:297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lacour JR, Bourdin M. Factors affecting the energy cost of level running at submaximal speed. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;115:651–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Earnest CP, Foster C, Hoyos J, et al. Time trial exertion traits of cycling’s Grand Tours. Int J Sports Med. 2009;30:240–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pugh LG. Oxygen intake in track and treadmill running with observations on the effect of air resistance. J Physiol. 1970;207:823–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pugh LG. The influence of wind resistance in running and walking and the mechanical efficiency of work against horizontal or vertical forces. J Physiol. 1971;213:255–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheuvront SN, Haymes EM. Thermoregulation and marathon running: biological and environmental influences. Sports Med. 2001;31:743–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoogkamer W, Kipp S, Frank JH, et al. A comparison of the energetic cost of running in marathon racing shoes. Sports Med. 2018;48:1009–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Olds T. The mathematics of breaking away and chasing in cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998;77:492–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Locomotion Lab, Department of Integrative PhysiologyUniversity of Colorado, BoulderBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsSwenson College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, DuluthDuluthUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations