Comment on: “Exercise Prescription in Patients With Different Combinations of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: A Consensus Statement From the EXPERT Working Group”
Letter to the Editor
- 92 Downloads
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this letter.
Conflict of interest
Herbert Löllgen, Petra Zupet, Andre Debruyne and Norbert Bachl declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the content of this letter.
- 1.Hansen D, Niebauer J, Cornelissen V, Barna O, Neunhäuserer D, Stettler C, et al. Exercise prescription in patients with different combinations of cardiovascular disease risk factors: a consensus statement from the EXPERT Working Group. Sports Med. 2018;48:1781–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0930-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Löllgen H, Zupet P. Exercise prescription for health: training recommendations for prevention and therapy. www.efsma.eu. Accessed 22 July 2018.
- 6.Börjesson M, Arvidsson D, Blomqvist Å, Daxberg E-L, Jonsdottir IH, Lundqvist S, et al. Efficacy of the Swedish model for physical activity by prescription [Effekter av den svenska modellen för fysisk aktivitet på recept (FaR)]. Göteborg: Västra Götalandsregionen, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, HTA-centrum, 2018. Regional activity based HTA 2018:100.Google Scholar
- 7.Löllgen H. Evidence based recommendations for exercise in health and disease. Santos: ICSEMIS Congress; 2016.Google Scholar
- 8.Löllgen H. Evidence based recommendations for exercise in health and disease. Ljubljana: FIMS World Congress of Sports Medicine; 2016.Google Scholar
- 9.Löllgen H. Exercise prescription for health.ERA-EDTA Congress, Vienna, 2016.Google Scholar
- 11.Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2315–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018