Sports Medicine

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 501–507 | Cite as

Equity in Physical Activity: A Misguided Goal

  • James L. NuzzoEmail author
Current Opinion


Rates of participation in physical activity are often not the same between groups in a given demographic category. These differences have been termed ‘inequities,’ and major health organizations are advocating large-scale initiatives to create ‘equity’ in physical activity. The aim of this paper is to explain why equity in physical activity is a misguided goal. Equity is a misguided goal because it ignores absolute rates of physical activity (i.e., it is a metric of how one group compares with another), and because it is an automated goal that ignores sizes of ‘gaps’ between groups. Moreover, equity initiatives incorrectly assume that groups with relatively high physical activity rates are always at lower health risk; that non-targeted groups will remain static in their levels of physical activity; that individuals are part of only one demographic category; that complete equity can be achieved; that the causal relationship between equity initiatives and their desired outcome can be known; and that differences in physical activity rates between groups are due to differences in ‘opportunity.’ Due to these issues, health organizations should abandon the goal of equity. Instead, they should aim to increase physical activity in groups that are most sedentary and/or at greatest health risk to a level that is as high as is feasible and possible, irrespective of how that new level compares with other groups. This goal is objective and not based on the misguided premises that underpin the current equity narrative.


Compliance with Ethical Standards


No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflict of interest

James Nuzzo declares he has no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article.


  1. 1.
    Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine—evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(Suppl 3):1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adult participation in aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activities—United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(17):326–30.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hasson RE, Brown DR, Dorn J, Barkley L, Torgan C, Whitt-Glover M, et al. Achieving equity in physical activity participation: ACSM experience and next steps. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(4):848–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coen SE. Connecting qualitative research on exercise and environment to public health agendas requires an equity lens. Health Place. (in press).
  5. 5.
    VicHealth. Promoting equity in physical activity: an evidence based summary. Fair Foundations Health Equity Series 2015. Available from:
  6. 6.
    World Health Organization—Regional Office for Europe. Physical activity strategy for the WHO European Region 2016–2025. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization—Regional Office for Europe; 2016.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coen S, Subedi RP, Rosenberg MW. Working out across Canada: is there a gender gap? Can Geogr. 2016;60(1):69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mielke GI, da Silva ICM, Kolbe-Alexander TL, Brown WJ. Shifting the physical inactivity curve worldwide by closing the gender gap. Sports Med. 2018;48(2):481–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization. Social determinants approaches to public health: from concept to practice. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nuzzo JL. Equity in physical activity is a misguided goal. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(6):1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loprinzi PD, Loenneke JP, Ahmed HM, Blaha MJ. Joint effects of objectively-measured sedentary time and physical activity on all-cause mortality. Prev Med. 2016;90:47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moore SC, Lee IM, Weiderpass E, Campbell PT, Sampson JN, Kitahara CM, et al. Association of leisure-time physical activity with risk of 26 types of cancer in 1.44 million adults. JAMA. Intern Med. 2016;176(6):816–25.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schnohr P, Lange P, Scharling H, Jensen JS. Long-term physical activity in leisure time and mortality from coronary heart disease, stroke, respiratory diseases, and cancer. The Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006;13(2):173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Villeneuve PJ, Morrison HI, Craig CL, Schaubel DE. Physical activity, physical fitness, and risk of dying. Epidemiology. 1998;9(6):626–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arias E, Heron M, Xu J. United States life tables, 2014. Natl Vit Stat Rep. 2017;66(4):1–64.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang H, Dwyer-Lindgren L, Lofgren KT, Rajaratnam JK, Marcus JR, Levin-Rector A, et al. Age-specific and sex-specific mortality in 187 countries, 1970–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2071–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heron M. Deaths: leading causes for 2015. Natl Vit Stat Rep. 2017;66(5):1–76.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schnohr P, Scharling H, Jensen JS. Changes in leisure-time physical activity and risk of death: an observational study of 7,000 men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158(7):639–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Walker M. Changes in physical activity, mortality, and incidence of coronary heart disease in older men. Lancet. 1998;351(9116):1603–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hasson RE, Brown DR, Dorn J, Barkley L, Torgan C, Whitt-Glover M, et al. Response. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(6):1342–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Asano M, Duquette P, Andersen R, Lapierre Y, Mayo NE. Exercise barriers and preferences among women and men with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(5):353–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bopp M, Wilcox S, Oberrecht L, Kammermann S, McElmurray CT. Correlates of strength training in older rural African American and Caucasian women. Women Health. 2004;40(1):1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burton E, Farrier K, Lewin G, Pettigrew S, Hill AM, Airey P, et al. Motivators and barriers for older people participating in resistance training: a systematic review. J Aging Phys Act. 2017;25(2):311–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Joseph RP, Ainsworth BE, Keller C, Dodgson JE. Barriers to physical activity among African American women: an integrative review of the literature. Women Health. 2015;55(6):679–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zunft HJ, Friebe D, Seppeit B, Widhalm K, Remaut de Winter AM, Vaz de Almeida MD. Perceived benefits and barriers to physical activity in a nationally representative sample in the European Union. Public Health Nutr. 1999;2(1A):153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Egli T, Bland HW, Melton BF, Czech DR. Influence of age, sex, and race on college students’ exercise motivation of physical activity. J Am Coll Health. 2011;59(5):399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Allan JD, Mayo K, Michel Y. Body size values of white and black women. Res Nurs Health. 1993;16(5):323–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harris MB, Walters LC, Waschull S. Gender and ethnic differences in obesity-related behaviors and attitudes in a college sample. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1991;21(19):1545–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kemper KA, Sargent RG, Drane JW, Valois RF, Hussey JR. Black and white females’ perceptions of ideal body size and social norms. Obes Res. 1994;2(2):117–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stevens J, Kumanyika SK, Keil JE. Attitudes toward body size and dieting: differences between elderly black and white women. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(8):1322–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Baker LC. Differences in earnings between male and female physicians. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:960–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neuroscience Research AustraliaRandwickAustralia

Personalised recommendations