Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 48, Issue 9, pp 2127–2142 | Cite as

Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training On Blood Pressure in Adults with Pre- to Established Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

  • Eduardo Caldas Costa
  • Jacqueline L. Hay
  • Dustin S. Kehler
  • Kevin F. Boreskie
  • Rakesh C. Arora
  • Daniel Umpierre
  • Andrea Szwajcer
  • Todd A. Duhamel
Systematic Review

Abstract

Background

Aerobic exercise reduces blood pressure (BP), but it is unknown whether a high-intensity training approach can elicit a greater BP reduction in populations with elevated BP. This systematic review compared the efficacy of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for reducing BP in adults with pre- to established hypertension.

Methods

Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PEDro, and SPORTDiscus) were searched for randomized trials comparing the chronic effects of HIIT versus MICT on BP in individuals with resting systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 85 mmHg and/or under antihypertensive medication. Random-effects modelling was used to compare changes from pre- to post-intervention in resting and ambulatory BP between HIIT and MICT. Changes from pre- to post-intervention in maximal oxygen uptake (\(\dot{V}\)O2max) between HIIT and MICT were also meta-analyzed. Data were reported as weighted mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Ambulatory BP was excluded from the meta-analysis due to the limited number of studies (two studies). Comparing changes from pre- to post-intervention, no differences in resting systolic BP (MD − 0.22 mmHg [CI 95%, − 5.36 to 4.92], p = 0.93, I2 = 53%) and diastolic BP (MD − 0.38 mmHg [CI 95%, − 3.31 to 2.54], p = 0.74, I2 = 0%) were found between HIIT and MICT (seven studies; 164 participants). HIIT improved \(\dot{V}\)O2max to a greater magnitude than MICT (MD 2.13 ml/kg/min [CI 95%, 1.00 to 3.27], p < 0.01, I2 = 41%) with similar completion rates of the intervention and attendance at the exercise training sessions (nine studies; 245 participants). Limited data were available to compare the incidence of adverse events between HIIT and MICT.

Conclusion

HIIT and MICT provided comparable reductions in resting BP in adults with pre- to established hypertension. HIIT was associated with greater improvements in \(\dot{V}\)O2max when compared to MICT. Future randomized trials should investigate the efficacy of HIIT versus MICT for reducing ambulatory BP in adults with pre- to established hypertension.

Registration

PROSPERO registration (2016: CRD42016041885).

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

Eduardo Caldas Costa and Daniel Umpierre are recipients of research grants from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (476902/2013-4 and 201422/2015-8). Jacqueline Hay is a recipient of the Canadian Institute of Health Research Vanier Scholarship. Dustin Kehler is a recipient of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Frederick Banting scholarship and the Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship. Kevin Boreskie is a recipient of a Manitoba Graduate Scholarship and is supported by the Graduate Enhancement of Tri-Council Stipends program. Todd Duhamel is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Heart and Stroke Foundation.

Conflict of interest

Eduardo Caldas Costa, Jacqueline Hay, Dustin Kehler, Kevin Boreskie, Rakesh Arora, Daniel Umpierre, Andrea Szwajcer, and Todd Duhamel declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

References

  1. 1.
    James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311:507–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
     World Health Organization—A Global Brief on Hypertension | The International Society of Hypertension 2017. http://ish-world.com/news/a/World-Health-Organization-A-Global-Brief-on-Hypertension/. Accessed 22 Jul 2017.
  3. 3.
    Daskalopoulou SS, Rabi DM, Zarnke KB, Dasgupta K, Nerenberg K, Cloutier L, et al. The 2015 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31:549–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. Blood Press. 2014;23:3–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Börjesson M, Onerup A, Lundqvist S, Dahlöf B. Physical activity and exercise lower blood pressure in individuals with hypertension: narrative review of 27 RCTs. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:356–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pescatello LS, MacDonald HV, Lamberti L, Johnson BT. Exercise for hypertension: A prescription update integrating existing recommendations with emerging research. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17:87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pescatello LS, MacDonald HV, Ash GI, Lamberti LM, Farquhar WB, Arena R, et al. Assessing the existing professional exercise recommendations for hypertension: a review and recommendations for future research priorities. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:801–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sosner P, Guiraud T, Gremeaux V, Arvisais D, Herpin D, Bosquet L. The ambulatory hypotensive effect of aerobic training: a reappraisal through a meta-analysis of selected moderators. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27:327–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson BT, MacDonald HV, Bruneau ML, Goldsby TU, Brown JC, Huedo-Medina TB, et al. Methodological quality of meta-analyses on the blood pressure response to exercise: a review. J Hypertens. 2014;32:706–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cornelissen VA, Smart NA. Exercise training for blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e004473.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cornelissen VA, Buys R, Smart NA. Endurance exercise beneficially affects ambulatory blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2013;31:639–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weston KS, Wisløff U, Coombes JS. High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:1227–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kemi OJ, Wisloff U. High-intensity aerobic exercise training improves the heart in health and disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2010;30:2–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wisløff U, Ellingsen Ø, Kemi OJ. High-intensity interval training to maximize cardiac benefits of exercise training? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2009;37:139–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liou K, Ho S, Fildes J, Ooi S-Y. High intensity interval versus moderate intensity continuous training in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of physiological and clinical parameters. Heart Lung Circ. 2016;25:166–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elliott AD, Rajopadhyaya K, Bentley DJ, Beltrame JF, Aromataris EC. Interval training versus continuous exercise in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;24:149–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramos JS, Dalleck LC, Tjonna AE, Beetham KS, Coombes JS. The impact of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on vascular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med Auckl NZ. 2015;45:679–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. http://handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 11 Jul 2017.
  19. 19.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Grimshaw J, Moher D, Lefebvre C. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:944–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Szwajcer A, Costa E. Systematic review and meta-analysis of effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on blood pressure in prehypertensive and hypertensive individuals: literature search documentation. 2017. https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/xmlui/handle/1993/32236. Accessed 22 Jul 2017.
  22. 22.
    Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee I-M, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1334–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smart NA, Waldron M, Ismail H, Giallauria F, Vigorito C, Cornelissen V, et al. Validation of a new tool for the assessment of study quality and reporting in exercise training studies: TESTEX. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13:9–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Angadi SS, Mookadam F, Lee CD, Tucker WJ, Haykowsky MJ, Gaesser GA. High-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous exercise training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study. J Appl Physiol Bethesda Md 1985. 2015;119:753–8.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ramos JS, Dalleck LC, Ramos MV, Borrani F, Roberts L, Gomersall S, et al. 12 min/week of high-intensity interval training reduces aortic reservoir pressure in individuals with metabolic syndrome: a randomized trial. J Hypertens. 2016;34:1977–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cheema BS, Davies TB, Stewart M, Papalia S, Atlantis E. The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015;7:3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jung ME, Bourne JE, Beauchamp MR, Robinson E, Little JP. High-intensity interval training as an efficacious alternative to moderate-intensity continuous training for adults with prediabetes. J. Diabetes Res. 2015. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jdr/2015/191595/. Accessed 22 Jul 2017.
  29. 29.
    Fu T-C, Wang C-H, Lin P-S, Hsu C-C, Cherng W-J, Huang S-C, et al. Aerobic interval training improves oxygen uptake efficiency by enhancing cerebral and muscular hemodynamics in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:41–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tjønna AE, Lee SJ, Rognmo Ø, Stølen TO, Bye A, Haram PM, et al. Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise as a treatment for the metabolic syndrome: a pilot study. Circulation. 2008;118:346–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rognmo Ø, Hetland E, Helgerud J, Hoff J, Slørdahl SA. High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil Off J Eur Soc Cardiol Work Groups Epidemiol Prev Card Rehabil Exerc Physiol. 2004;11:216–22.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Iellamo F, Caminiti G, Sposato B, Vitale C, Massaro M, Rosano G, et al. Effect of high-intensity interval training versus moderate continuous training on 24-h blood pressure profile and insulin resistance in patients with chronic heart failure. Intern Emerg Med. 2014;9:547–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Molmen-Hansen HE, Stolen T, Tjonna AE, Aamot IL, Ekeberg IS, Tyldum GA, et al. Aerobic interval training reduces blood pressure and improves myocardial function in hypertensive patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19:151–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Whelton PK, He J, Appel LJ, Cutler JA, Havas S, Kotchen TA, et al. Primary prevention of hypertension: clinical and public health advisory from The National High Blood Pressure Education Program. JAMA. 2002;288:1882–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:957–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bundy JD, Li C, Stuchlik P, Bu X, Kelly TN, Mills KT, et al. Systolic blood pressure reduction and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:775–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dharmashankar K, Widlansky ME. Vascular endothelial function and hypertension: insights and directions. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2010;12:448–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barac A, Panza JA. Mechanisms of decreased vascular function with aging. Hypertension. 2009;53:900–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brandes RP. Endothelial dysfunction and hypertension. Hypertension. 2014;64:924–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, Church TS, Després J-P, Franklin BA, et al. Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: a case for fitness as a clinical vital sign: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134:e653–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lee D, Sui X, Artero EG, Lee I-M, Church TS, McAuley PA, et al. Long-term effects of changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and body mass index on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men: the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. Circulation. 2011;124:2483–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Weston M, Taylor KL, Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. Effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training (HIT) on fitness in adults: a meta-analysis of controlled and non-controlled trials. Sports Med. 2014;44:1005–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gist NH, Fedewa MV, Dishman RK, Cureton KJ. Sprint interval training effects on aerobic capacity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med Auckl NZ. 2014;44:269–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Xie B, Yan X, Cai X, Li J. Effects of high-intensity interval training on aerobic capacity in cardiac patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5420840.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gray SR, Ferguson C, Birch K, Forrest LJ, Gill JMR. High-intensity interval training: key data needed to bridge the gap from laboratory to public health policy. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1231–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Taylor KL, Weston M, Batterham AM. Evaluating intervention fidelity: an example from a high-intensity interval training study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gupta SK. Intention-to-treat concept: a review. Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2:109–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Caldas Costa
    • 1
  • Jacqueline L. Hay
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dustin S. Kehler
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kevin F. Boreskie
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rakesh C. Arora
    • 3
  • Daniel Umpierre
    • 4
  • Andrea Szwajcer
    • 5
  • Todd A. Duhamel
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physical EducationFederal University of Rio Grande do NorteNatalBrazil
  2. 2.Health, Leisure & Human Performance Research Institute, Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation ManagementUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  3. 3.Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, St-Boniface Hospital Albrechtsen Research CentreWinnipegCanada
  4. 4.National Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (IATS)-CNPq, Federal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  5. 5.University of Manitoba LibrariesWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations