Baseline Performance of NCAA Athletes on a Concussion Assessment Battery: A Report from the CARE Consortium
- 389 Downloads
Sport-related concussion and repetitive head impact exposure in contact sports continue to receive increased attention in public and medical spheres. The Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium, a multicenter cooperative, was established to study the natural history of concussion in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) collegiate student-athletes across 29 colleges and universities in the United States. The purpose of this investigation is to provide normative data from the CARE Consortium and evaluate for differences between sport categories.
NCAA student-athletes were evaluated annually for general demographics and sport-specific characteristics before the start of the competitive season. We collected demographic and medical history information and evaluated each student-athlete’s neurocognitive function, neurological status, postural stability, and self-reported symptoms. Sports were categorized by the amount of contact typically associated with the sport (i.e., contact, limited contact, non-contact). Comparisons between the three sport categories for the evaluated variables were made using linear or zero inflated negative binomial regression models adjusted for gender, concussion history, and household income.
Over a 2-year period (August 2014–July 2016), 15,681 NCAA athletes completed preseason evaluations. Overall, 53% of the athletes were in the contact sport group, 31% were in the limited contact group and 17% were in the non-contact group. After adjusting for covariates, there were statistically significant differences found between athlete groups, although the differences and effect sizes were small and not clinically significant. The contact sport group had better scores on Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment Testing (ImPACT®) visual and verbal memory, Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) symptom checklist, and Brief Symptom Inventory–18 (BSI-18), but slower ImPACT reaction time and worse scores on Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC). Further, the data indicate that some ImPACT score distributions were noticeably different from those presented in the technical manual.
In this large, racially and socio-economically diverse cohort of male and female college athletes, we found no evidence that student-athletes participating in contact sports have clinically meaningful deficits in pre-season cognitive and balance testing. They also did not report significantly more symptoms of psychological distress when compared with student-athletes in non-contact or limited contact sports. In addition, the data suggest potential limitations when using published ImPACT norms when evaluating injured athletes.
Contributing investigators include Scott Anderson, ATC (University of Oklahoma); Jeffrey Bazarian, MD, MPH (University of Rochester); Christopher Todd Bullers, MD (Wake Forest University); Christopher Giza, MD (University of California–Los Angeles); Kevin Guskiewicz, PhD, ATC (University of North Carolina); Jessica Dysart Myles, PhD, ATC (University of North Georgia); Patrick O’Donnell, MHA (United States Coast Guard Academy); Steven J. Svoboda, MD (United States Military Academy); and Ryan Tierney, PhD, ATC (Temple University). The authors would also like to thank Jody Harland, Janetta Matesan, Larry Riggen, and Shi Zhao (Indiana University); Ashley and Ellie Rettmann (University of Michigan); Melissa Koschnitzke (Medical College of Wisconsin); Michael Jarrett, Vibeke Brinck and Bianca Byrne (Quesgen); Thomas Dompier, Melissa Niceley Baker, and Sara Dalton (Datalys Center for Sports Injury Research and Prevention); and the research and medical staff at each of the participating sites. This publication was made possible, in part, with support from the Grand Alliance Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) Consortium, funded by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the Department of Defense (DoD). The US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, 820 Chandler Street, Fort Detrick MD 21702-5014, is the awarding and administering acquisition office. This work was supported by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through the Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury Program under Award NO W81XWH-14-2-0151. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense (DHP funds).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors received funding from the NCAA and DoD to complete this investigation and cover travel costs when speaking about the study. Barry Katz, Maria Kudela, Jaroslaw Harezlak, Michael McCrea, Thomas McAllister, and Steven Broglio declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:e55–71.Google Scholar
- 12.Broglio SP, McCrea M, McAllister T, et al. A national study on the effects of concussion in collegiate athletes and US Military Service Academy Members: the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium Structure and Methods. Sports Med. 2017:0707–0701.Google Scholar
- 13.ImPACT Applications Inc. Immediate post-concussion assessment testing (ImPACT®) test—online version 2007–2012. Pittsburgh, PA. 2011, pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
- 19.McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(5):e55–71.Google Scholar
- 22.Hintze JL, Nelson RD. Violin plots: a box plot-density trace synergism. Am Stat. 1998;52(2):181–4.Google Scholar
- 31.ImPACT Applications Inc. ImPACT Version 2.0 clinical user’s manual. Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 1–71.Google Scholar