Comment on: “Talent Identification in Sport: A Systematic Review”
- 457 Downloads
We read the recent systematic review by Johnston et al.  with great interest, and we compliment the authors on providing an overview of the empirical studies regarding talent identification programs in sports. The talent identification literature contains many studies that relate one or multiple performance components to athletes’ skill levels to find prerequisites for excellent athletic performance. Although other critical nonsystematic reviews on talent identification programs have been published [2, 3, 4, 5, 6], a systematic review synthesizing the available evidence in terms of predictive validity of the performance components was timely. Accordingly, the review by Johnston et al.  can be used to highlight several gaps in the talent identification research field, as we will elaborate on below. We think that research from selection psychology can offer some valuable insights with respect to the conclusion by Johnston et al.  that large inconsistencies exist in...
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this letter.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Tom L. G. Bergkamp, A. Susan M. Niessen, Ruud J. R. den Hartigh, Wouter G. P. Frencken, and Rob R. Meijer have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this letter.
- 2.Abbott A, Button C, Pepping G, Collins D. Unnatural selection: talent identification and development in sport. Nonlinear Dyn Psychol Life Sci. 2005;9(1):61–88.Google Scholar
- 9.Sackett PR, Putka DJ, McCloy RA. The concept of validity and the process of validation. In: Schmitt N, editor. The Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 91–118.Google Scholar