Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 289–318 | Cite as

Match Running Performance in Young Soccer Players: A Systematic Review

  • Luiz Henrique Palucci Vieira
  • Christopher Carling
  • Fabio Augusto Barbieri
  • Rodrigo Aquino
  • Paulo Roberto Pereira SantiagoEmail author
Systematic Review

Abstract

Background

To date, athletic performance has been extensively assessed in youth soccer players through laboratory and field testing. Only recently has running performance via time–motion analysis been assessed during match play. Match running data are often useful in a practical context to aid game understanding and decision making regarding training content and prescriptions. A plethora of previous reviews have collated and appraised the literature on time–motion analysis in professional senior players, but none have solely examined youth players.

Objective

The aim of the present systematic review was to provide a critical appraisal and summary of the original research articles that have evaluated match running performance in young male soccer players.

Methods

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, literature searches were performed in four databases: PubMed, ISI Web of Science, SPORTDiscus and SciELO. We used the following descriptors: soccer, football, young, youth, junior, physical performance, running performance, match running performance, movement patterns, time–motion analysis, distances covered, activity profile, work rate, match analysis, and match performance. Articles were included only if they were original articles written in the English language, studied populations of male children and/or adolescents (aged ≤ 20 years), were published/ahead of print on or before 31 December 2017 and showed at least one outcome measure regarding match running performance, such as total distance covered, peak game speed or indicators of activities performed at established speed thresholds.

Results

A total of 5801 records were found. After duplicates were removed and exclusion and inclusion criteria applied, 50 articles were included (n = 2615 participants). Their outcome measures were extracted and findings were synthesized. The majority of the reviewed papers covered the European continent (62%) and used global positioning systems (GPS) (64%). Measurement error of the tools used to obtain position data and running metrics was systematically overlooked among the studies. The main aims of studies were to examine differences across playing positions (20%), age groups (26%) and match halves (36%). Consistent findings pointed to the existence of positional role and age effects on match running output (using fixed running speed thresholds), but there was no clear consensus about reductions in activity over the course of match play. Congested schedules negatively affected players’ running performance. While over 32% of all studies assessed the relationships between match running performance and physical capacity, biochemical markers and body composition, ~ 70% of these did not account for playing position.

Conclusions

This review collated scientific evidence that can aid soccer conditioning professionals in understanding external match loads across youth categories. Coaches working with youth development programs should consider that data derived from a given population may not be relevant for other populations, since game rules, match format and configuration are essentially unstandardized among studies for age-matched players. Despite limited evidence, periodization training emphasizing technical-tactical content can improve match running performance. Occurrence of acute and residual impairments in the running performance of young soccer players is common. Prescription of postmatch recovery strategies, such as cold water immersion and spa treatment, can potentially help reduce these declines, although additional research is warranted. This review also highlighted areas requiring further investigation, such as the possible influence of environmental and contextual constraints and a more integrative approach combining tactical and technical data.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This study was funded by the Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES), National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (Grant 481833/2013-7) and São Paulo Research Foundation–FAPESP (Grant numbers 2016/50250-1, 2017/20945-0 and 2018/02965-7).

Conflict of interest

Luiz Henrique Palucci Vieira, Christopher Carling, Fabio Augusto Barbieri, Rodrigo Aquino and Paulo Roberto Pereira Santiago have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

References

  1. 1.
    Williams AM, Reilly T. Talent identification and development in soccer. J Sports Sci. 2000;18(9):657–67.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410050120041.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Unnithan V, White J, Georgiou A, Iga J, Drust B. Talent identification in youth soccer. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(15):1719–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.731515.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palucci Vieira LH, Aquino R, Moura FA, Barros RML, Arpini VM, Oliveira LP, et al. Team dynamics, running, and skill-related performances of Brazilian U11 to professional soccer players during official matches. J Strength Cond Res. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC0000000000002577 (Ahead of print).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carling C, Bloomfield J, Nelsen L, Reilly T. The role of motion analysis in elite soccer: contemporary performance measurement techniques and work rate data. Sports Med. 2008;38(10):839–62.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mohr M, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J. Fatigue in soccer: a brief review. J Sports Sci. 2005;23(6):593–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021286.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sarmento H, Marcelino R, Anguera MT, CampaniÇo J, Matos N, LeitÃo JC. Match analysis in football: a systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(20):1831–43.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.898852.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lago-Peñas C. The role of situational variables in analysing physical performance in soccer. J Hum Kinet. 2012;35:89–95.  https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-012-0082-9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carling C, Gregson W, McCall A, Moreira A, del Wong P, Bradley PS. Match running performance during fixture congestion in elite soccer: research issues and future directions. Sports Med. 2015;45(5):605–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0313-z.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reilly T, Drust B, Clarke N. Muscle fatigue during football match-play. Sports Med. 2008;38(5):357–67.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sarmento H, Clemente FM, Araújo D, Davids K, McRobert A, Figueiredo A. What performance analysts need to know about research trends in Association Football (2012–2016): a systematic review. Sports Med. 2018;48(4):799–836.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0836-6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor JB, Wright AA, Dischiavi SL, Townsend MA, Marmon AR. Activity demands during multi-directional team sports: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2017;47(12):2533–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0772-5.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buchheit M, Mendez-villanueva A, Simpson BM, Bourdon PC. Repeated-sprint sequences during youth soccer matches. Int J Sports Med. 2010;31(10):709–16.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1261897.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harley JA, Barnes CA, Portas M, Lovell R, Barrett S, Paul D, et al. Motion analysis of match-play in elite U12 to U16 age-group soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(13):1391–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.510142.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mendez-Villanueva A, Buchheit M, Simpson B, Bourdon PC. Match play intensity distribution in youth soccer. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(2):101–10.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1306323.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goto H, Morris JG, Nevill ME. Motion analysis of U11 to U16 elite English Premier League Academy players. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(12):1248–58.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.999700.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Atan SA, Foskett A, Ali A. Motion analysis of match play in New Zealand U13 to U15 age-group soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(9):2416–23.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001336.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al Haddad H, Simpson BM, Buchheit M, Di Salvo V, Mendez-Villanueva A. Peak match speed and maximal sprinting speed in young soccer players: effect of age and playing position. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(7):888–96.  https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2014-0539.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buchheit M, Mendez-Villanueva A, Simpson BM, Bourdon PC. Match running performance and fitness in youth soccer. Int J Sports Med. 2010;31(11):818–25.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262838.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saward C, Morris JG, Nevill ME, Nevill AM, Sunderland C. Longitudinal development of match-running performance in elite male youth soccer players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26(8):933–42.  https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12534.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bellistri G, Marzorati M, Sodero L, Sforza C, Bradley PS, Porcelli S. Match running performance and physical capacity profiles of U8 and U10 soccer players. Sport Sci Health. 2017;13(2):273–80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-016-0328-3.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barros RM, Misuta MS, Menezes RP, Figueroa PJ, Moura FA, Cunha SA, et al. Analysis of the distances covered by first division brazilian soccer players obtained with an automatic tracking method. J Sports Sci Med. 2007;6(2):233–42.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vieira LHP, Milioni F, Barbieri RA, Rodrigues CM, Calsani EP, Tourinho Filho H, et al. Rastreamento de jogadores de futsal: uma revisão de literatura. Rev Min Educ Fis. 2016;24(1):70–107.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Andrzejewski M, Pluta B, Posiadala D. Characteristics of physical loads of young footballers during a championship match. J Hum Kinet. 2009;21:83–8.  https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-09-0010-9.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Castagna C, D’Ottavio S, Abt G. Activity profile of young soccer players during actual match play. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(4):775–80.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aquino R, Munhoz Martins GH, Palucci Vieira LH, Menezes RP. Influence of match location, quality of opponents, and match status on movement patterns in Brazilian professional football players. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(8):2155–61.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001674.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goto H, Morris JG, Nevill ME. Match analysis of U9 and U10 English premier league academy soccer players using a global positioning system: relevance for talent identification and development. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(4):954–63.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a0d751.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pereira Da Silva N, Kirkendall DT, De Barros Leite, Neto T. Movement patterns in elite Brazilian youth soccer. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2007;47(3):270–5.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aquino R, Palucci LHV, de Oliveira Paula L, Cruz Goncalves LG, Pereira Santiago PR. Relationship between field tests and match running performance in high-level young Brazilian soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2018;58(3):256–62.  https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.17.06651-8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aslan A, Acikada C, Guvenc A, Goren H, Hazir T, Ozkara A. Metabolic demands of match performance in young soccer players. J Sports Sci Med. 2012;11(1):170–9.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aughey RJ, Hammond K, Varley MC, Schmidt WF, Bourdon PC, Buchheit M, et al. Soccer activity profile of altitude versus sea-level natives during acclimatisation to 3600 m (ISA3600). Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(Suppl 1):i107–13.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092776.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pettersen SA, Krustrup P, Bendiksen M, Randers MB, Brito J, Bangsbo J, et al. Caffeine supplementation does not affect match activities and fatigue resistance during match play in young football players. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(20):1958–65.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.965189.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aquino RLQT, Cruz Goncalves LG, Palucci Vieira LH, Oliveira LP, Alves GF, Pereira Santiago PR, et al. Periodization training focused on technical-tactical ability in young soccer players positively affects biochemical markers and game performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(10):2723–32.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001381.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Waldron M, Murphy A. A comparison of physical abilities and match performance characteristics among elite and subelite under-14 soccer players. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2013;25(3):423–34.  https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.25.3.423.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bishop C, Turner A, Read P. Effects of inter-limb asymmetries on physical and sports performance: a systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(10):1135–44.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1361894.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Castellano J, Alvarez-Pastor D, Bradley PS. Evaluation of research using computerised tracking systems (Amisco and Prozone) to analyse physical performance in elite soccer: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2014;44(5):701–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0144-3.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Capranica L, Tessitore A, Guidetti L, Figura F. Heart rate and match analysis in pre-pubescent soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2001;19(6):379–84.  https://doi.org/10.1080/026404101300149339.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stroyer J, Hansen L, Klausen K. Physiological profile and activity pattern of young soccer players during match play. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(1):168–74.  https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000106187.05259.96.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Castagna C, Impellizzeri F, Cecchini E, Rampinini E, Alvarez JC. Effects of intermittent-endurance fitness on match performance in young male soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(7):1954–9.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b7f743.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Castagna C, Manzi V, Impellizzeri F, Weston M, Barbero Alvarez JC. Relationship between endurance field tests and match performance in young soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(12):3227–33.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e72709.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mendez-Villanueva A, Buchheit M, Simpson B, Peltola E, Bourdon P. Does on-field sprinting performance in young soccer players depend on how fast they can run or how fast they do run? J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(9):2634–8.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318201c281.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Buchheit M, Simpson BM, Mendez-Villanueva A. Repeated high-speed activities during youth soccer games in relation to changes in maximal sprinting and aerobic speeds. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(1):40–8.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1316363.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rebelo A, Brito J, Seabra A, Oliveira J, Krustrup P. Physical match performance of youth football players in relation to physical capacity. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(Suppl 1):S148–56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2012.664171.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hunter F, Bray J, Towlson C, Smith M, Barrett S, Madden J, et al. Individualisation of time-motion analysis: a method comparison and case report series. Int J Sports Med. 2015;36(1):41–8.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1384547.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Aquino RL, Goncalves LG, Vieira LH, Oliveira LP, Alves GF, Santiago PR, et al. Biochemical, physical and tactical analysis of a simulated game in young soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2016;56(12):1554–61.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fernandes-da-Silva J, Castagna C, Teixeira AS, Carminatti LJ, Guglielmo LG. The peak velocity derived from the Carminatti Test is related to physical match performance in young soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(24):2238–45.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1209307.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Doncaster G, Marwood S, Iga J, Unnithan V. Influence of oxygen uptake kinetics on physical performance in youth soccer. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(9):1781–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3431-x.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Varley MC, Gregson W, McMillan K, Bonnano D, Stafford K, Modonutti M, et al. Physical and technical performance of elite youth soccer players during international tournaments: influence of playing position and team success and opponent quality. Sci Med Footb. 2017;1(1):18–29.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Arruda AF, Carling C, Zanetti V, Aoki MS, Coutts AJ, Moreira A. Effects of a very congested match schedule on body-load impacts, accelerations, and running measures in youth soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(2):248–52.  https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2014-0148.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sporis G, Dujic I, Trajkovic N, Milanovic Z, Madic D. Relationship between morphological characteristics and match performance in junior soccer players. Int J Morphol. 2017;35(1):37–41.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100007.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Buchheit M, Horobeanu C, Mendez-Villanueva A, Simpson BM, Bourdon PC. Effects of age and spa treatment on match running performance over two consecutive games in highly trained young soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(6):591–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.546424.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rowsell GJ, Coutts AJ, Reaburn P, Hill-Haas S. Effect of post-match cold-water immersion on subsequent match running performance in junior soccer players during tournament play. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(1):1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.512640.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Garvican LA, Hammond K, Varley MC, Gore CJ, Billaut F, Aughey RJ. Lower running performance and exacerbated fatigue in soccer played at 1600 m. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(3):397–404.  https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2012-0375.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Randers MB, Andersen TB, Rasmussen LS, Larsen MN, Krustrup P. Effect of game format on heart rate, activity profile, and player involvement in elite and recreational youth players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):17–26.  https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12255.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Andrzejewski M, Chmura J, Wiacek M, Zubrzycki IZ. Influence of individualized training on psychomotor performance of young soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(2):374–8.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bac390.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Randers MB, Mujika I, Hewitt A, Santisteban J, Bischoff R, Solano R, et al. Application of four different football match analysis systems: a comparative study. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(2):171–82.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903428525.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Romagnoli M, Sanchis-Gomar F, Alis R, Risso-Ballester J, Bosio A, Graziani RL, et al. Changes in muscle damage, inflammation, and fatigue-related parameters in young elite soccer players after a match. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2016;56(10):1198–205.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Buchheit M, Hammond K, Bourdon PC, Simpson BM, Garvican-Lewis LA, Schmidt WF, et al. Relative match intensities at high altitude in highly-trained young soccer players (ISA3600). J Sports Sci Med. 2015;14(1):98–102.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Helgerud J, Engen LC, Wisloff U, Hoff J. Aerobic endurance training improves soccer performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(11):1925–31.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Buchheit M, Mendez-Villanueva A. Effects of age, maturity and body dimensions on match running performance in highly trained under-15 soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(13):1271–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.884721.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bravo-Sánchez A, Abián-Vicén J, Abián P. Analysis of the physical and technical differences between 7-a-side and 8-a-side game modalities in official under 12 soccer matches. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2017;17(4):545–54.  https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2017.1366760.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Brito Â, Roriz P, Silva P, Duarte R, Garganta J. Effects of pitch surface and playing position on external load activity profiles and technical demands of young soccer players in match play. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2017;17(6):902–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2017.1407207.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Dello Iacono A, Martone D, Cular D, Milic M, Padulo J. Game profile-based training in soccer: a new field approach. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(12):3333–42.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC0000000000001768.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kęsicki G, Lewicki W. Innovative dimension of using telematics tools in training processes of young football players. Trends Sport Sci. 2017;24(4):167–73.  https://doi.org/10.23829/TSS.2017.24-4.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rago V, Pizzuto F, Raiola G. Relationship between intermittent endurance capacity and match performance according to the playing position in sub-19 professional male football players: preliminary results. J Phys Educ Sport. 2017;17(2):688–91.  https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.02103.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Izzo R, Varde’i CH. Differences by field positions between young and senior amateur soccer players using GPS technologies. Ovidius Univ Ann Ser Phys Educ Sport Sci Mov Health. 2017;17(2):344–52.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Vigh-Larsen JF, Dalgas U, Andersen TB. Position-specific acceleration and deceleration profiles in elite youth and senior soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(4):1114–22.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC0000000000001918.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bangsbo J, Iaia FM, Krustrup P. The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test : a useful tool for evaluation of physical performance in intermittent sports. Sports Med. 2008;38(1):37–51.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zacharogiannis E, Paradisis G, Tziortzis S. An evaluation of tests of anaerobic power and capacity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(5):S116.  https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-200405001-00549.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hoff J, Wisløff U, Engen LC, Kemi OJ, Helgerud J. Soccer specific aerobic endurance training. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(3):218–21.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.36.3.218.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Mendez-Villanueva A, Buchheit M, Kuitunen S, Poon TK, Simpson B, Peltola E. Is the relationship between sprinting and maximal aerobic speeds in young soccer players affected by maturation? Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2010;22(4):497–510.  https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.22.4.497.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ohashi J, Miyagi O, Nagahama H, Ogushi T, Ohashi K. Application of an analysis system evaluating intermittent activity during a soccer match. In: Spinks W, Reilly T, Murphy A, editors. Science and football IV. London: Routledge; 2002.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Carling C, Collins D. Comment on “Match analysis of U9 and U10 English premier league academy soccer players using a global positioning system: relevance for talent identification and development”. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(2):e61–3.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000466.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    English Premier League. Games Programme. EPL. 2012. https://www.premierleague.com/youth/games-programme. Accessed 07 Dec 2017.
  75. 75.
    Auckland Football Federation. 2017 Federation Competition Regulations, AFF youth 9th to 17th grades: general provisions. AFF. 2017. http://www.aucklandfootball.org.nz/comps/regulations-resources. Accessed 07 Dec 2017.
  76. 76.
    Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio. Attività di base. FIGC. 2017. http://www.figc.it/en/3332/21180/Attivita_SGS.shtml. Accessed 07 Dec 2017.
  77. 77.
    Malina RM, Eisenmann JC, Cumming SP, Ribeiro B, Aroso J. Maturity-associated variation in the growth and functional capacities of youth football (soccer) players 13–15 years. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;91(5–6):555–62.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0995-z.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Goto H, Morris JG, Nevill ME. Influence of biological maturity on the match performance of 8–16 year old elite male youth soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000002510 (Publish Ahead of Print).Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Cumming SP, Brown DJ, Mitchell S, Bunce J, Hunt D, Hedges C, et al. Premier League academy soccer players’ experiences of competing in a tournament bio-banded for biological maturation. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(7):757–65.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1340656.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Freitas CG, Aoki MS, Arruda AFS, Franciscon C, Moreira A. Monitoring salivary immunoglobulin a responses to official and simulated matches in elite young soccer players. J Hum Kinet. 2016;53:107–15.  https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2016-0015.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Hill-Haas SV, Rowsell GJ, Dawson BT, Coutts AJ. Acute physiological responses and time-motion characteristics of two small-sided training regimes in youth soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(1):111–5.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181efc1a.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Castellano J, Casamichana D, Dellal A. Influence of game format and number of players on heart rate responses and physical demands in small-sided soccer games. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(5):1295–303.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318267a5d1.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Massard T, Eggers T, Lovell R. Peak speed determination in football: is sprint testing necessary? Sci Med Footb. 2018;2(2):123–6.  https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2017.1398409.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Scott D, Lovell R. Individualisation of speed thresholds does not enhance the dose-response determination in football training. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(13):1523–32.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1398894.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Buchheit M, Allen A, Poon TK, Modonutti M, Gregson W, Di Salvo V. Integrating different tracking systems in football: multiple camera semi-automatic system, local position measurement and GPS technologies. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(20):1844–57.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.942687.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Scott MT, Scott TJ, Kelly VG. The validity and reliability of global positioning systems in team sport: a brief review. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(5):1470–90.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001221.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Varley MC, Di Salvo V, Modonutti M, Gregson W, Mendez-Villanueva A. The influence of successive matches on match-running performance during an under-23 international soccer tournament: The necessity of individual analysis. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(5):585–91.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1325511.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Valter DS, Adam C, Barry M, Marco C. Validation of Prozone®: a new video-based performance analysis system. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2006;6(1):108–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2006.11868359.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Barris S, Button C. A review of vision-based motion analysis in sport. Sports Med. 2008;38(12):1025–43.  https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200838120-00006.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Figueroa PJ, Leite NJ, Barros RML. Background recovering in outdoor image sequences: an example of soccer players segmentation. Image Vis Comput. 2006;24(4):363–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2005.12.012.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Palucci Vieira LH, Aquino R, Lago-Peñas C, Munhoz Martins GH, Puggina EF, Barbieri FA. Running performance in Brazilian professional football players during a congested match schedule. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(2):313–25.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002342.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Paul DJ, Bradley PS, Nassis GP. Factors affecting match running performance of elite soccer players: shedding some light on the complexity. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(4):516–9.  https://doi.org/10.1123/IJSPP.2015-0029.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Carling C. Interpreting physical performance in professional soccer match-play: should we be more pragmatic in our approach? Sports Med. 2013;43(8):655–63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0055-8.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Bradley PS, Ade JD. Are current physical match performance metrics in elite soccer fit for purpose or is the adoption of an integrated approach needed? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(5):656–64.  https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2017-0433.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Lago-Peñas C, Rey E, Lago-Ballesteros J. The influence of effective playing time on physical demands of elite soccer players. Open Sports Sci J. 2012;5:188–92.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399X01205010188.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Mendez-Villanueva A, Buchheit M. Football-specific fitness testing: adding value or confirming the evidence? J Sports Sci. 2013;31(13):1503–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2013.823231.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Nassis GP, Brito J, Dvorak J, Chalabi H, Racinais S. The association of environmental heat stress with performance: analysis of the 2014 FIFA World Cup Brazil. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:609–13.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094449.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Falk B, Dotan R. Temperature regulation and elite young athletes. Med Sport Sci. 2011;56:126–49.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000320645.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Lago-Penas C, Rey E, Lago-Ballesteros J, Casais L, Dominguez E. The influence of a congested calendar on physical performance in elite soccer. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(8):2111–7.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC0b013e3181eccdd2.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Dellal A, Lago-Penas C, Rey E, Chamari K, Orhant E. The effects of a congested fixture period on physical performance, technical activity and injury rate during matches in a professional soccer team. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(6):390–4.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091290.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Folgado H, Duarte R, Marques P, Sampaio J. The effects of congested fixtures period on tactical and physical performance in elite football. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(12):1238–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1022576.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Buchheit M, Mendez-Villanueva A. Reliability and stability of anthropometric and performance measures in highly-trained young soccer players: effect of age and maturation. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(12):1332–43.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2013.781662.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Castellano J, Blanco-Villasenor A, Alvarez D. Contextual variables and time-motion analysis in soccer. Int J Sports Med. 2011;32(6):415–21.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1271771.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Carling C, Wright C, Nelson LJ, Bradley PS. Comment on “Performance analysis in football: a critical review and implications for future research”. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(1):2–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2013.807352.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Requena B, de Villarreal ESS, Gapeyeva H, Ereline J, Garcia I, Paasuke M. Relationship between postactivation potentiation of knee extensor muscles, sprinting and vertical jumping performance in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(2):367–73.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181be31aa.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Bellinger PM. β-Alanine supplementation for athletic performance: an update. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(6):1751–70.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000327.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Nedelec M, McCall A, Carling C, Legall F, Berthoin S, Dupont G. Recovery in soccer: part II-recovery strategies. Sports Med. 2013;43(1):9–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-012-0002-0.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Sainani KL. The problem with “magnitude-based inference”. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(10):2166–76.  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001645.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(1):3–13.  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Knudson D. Confidence crisis of results in biomechanics research. Sports Biomech. 2017;16(4):425–33.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2016.1246603.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Hopkins WG, Batterham AM. Error rates, decisive outcomes and publication bias with several inferential methods. Sports Med. 2016;46(10):1563–73.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0517-x.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Buchheit M. The numbers will love you back in return—I promise. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(4):551–4.  https://doi.org/10.1123/IJSPP.2016-0214.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FMRP Faculty of Medicine at Ribeirão Preto, University of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
  2. 2.LaBioCoM Biomechanics and Motor Control Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto, University of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
  3. 3.Institute of Coaching and Performance, University of Central LancashirePrestonUK
  4. 4.MOVI-LAB Human Movement Research Laboratory, Physical Education Department, Faculty of SciencesSão Paulo State University UNESPBauruBrazil
  5. 5.CIFI2D, FADEUP Faculty of Sports, University of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations