Reply to Tarp et al.: Comment on: “Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Childhood and Adolescence Affects Future Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies”
- 34 Downloads
We appreciate the insightful comments and observations by Tarp et al.  regarding our systematic review . The suggestions and nuances raised are important aspects when interpreting the findings of this systematic review and may aid future reviews on the topic. We are grateful for the opportunity to clarify some of the topics they raise .
Tarp et al.  justifiably argue that field-based and sub-maximal tests cannot provide precise estimates of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). As the purpose of this systematic review was to assess whether a relatively higher level of CRF was associated with poorer future cardiometabolic health, we felt the inclusion of field tests appropriate, since these tests are the most (often only) feasible option in cohort studies. Field testing has also been shown to have moderate to good validity compared with criterion tests . Thus, although we would support using the most reliable assessment of the exposure, i.e., a laboratory-based...
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this letter.
Conflict of interest
Stijn Mintjens, Malou Menting, Joost Daams, Mireille van Poppel, Tessa Roseboom and Reinoud Gemke have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this letter.
- 1.Tarp J, Dalene KE, Steene-Johannessen J, Ekelund U. Comment on: “Cardiorespiratory fitness in childhood and adolescence affects future cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review of longitudinal studies.” Sports Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-01035-z.
- 2.Mintjens S, Menting MD, Daams JG, van Poppel MNM, Roseboom TJ, Gemke R. Cardiorespiratory fitness in childhood and adolescence affects future cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Sports Med. 2018;48(11):2577–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0974-5 (First online 24 August 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Batista MB, Romanzini CLP, Castro-Pinero J, Ronque ERV. Validity of field tests to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2017;35(2):222–33. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;2;00002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Hayden JA, van der Windt DA, Cartwright JL, Côté P, Bombardier C. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(4):280–6. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Grontved A, Brage S, Moller NC, Kristensen PL, Wedderkopp N, Froberg K, et al. Hemodynamic variables during exercise in childhood and resting systolic blood pressure levels 6 years later in adolescence: the European Youth Heart Study. J Hum Hypertens. 2011;25(10):608–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2010.103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Castro-Piñero J, Ortega F, Keating XD, González-Montesinos J, Sjöstrom M, Ruíz JR. Percentile values for aerobic performance running/walking field tests in children aged 6 to 17 years; influence of weight status. Nutr Hosp. 2011;26(3):572–8.Google Scholar
- 12.Aires L, Andersen LB, Mendonca D, Martins C, Silva G, Mota J. A 3-year longitudinal analysis of changes in fitness, physical activity, fatness and screen time [Erratum appears in Acta Paediatr. 2010 Jan;99(1):153]. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99(1):140–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01536.x.Google Scholar
- 14.Grontved A, Ried-Larsen M, Ekelund U, Froberg K, Brage S, Andersen LB. Independent and combined association of muscle strength and cardiorespiratory fitness in youth with insulin resistance and beta-cell function in young adulthood: the European Youth Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2575–81. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar