Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 747–748 | Cite as

Comment on: “Health Benefits of Light-Intensity Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of Accelerometer Data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)”

  • Juan Pablo Rey-LópezEmail author
Letter to the Editor

I read with special interest the recent review by Füzéki et al. [1] on the potential health benefits of light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) in humans. The article aimed to summarize the literature linking LIPA and health but restricted the search strategy to publications from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). In this systematic review, the authors concluded, “the observational evidence that light-intensity physical activity can confer health benefits is accumulating.” Contrary to this statement, I would like to express my thoughts on how Füzéki et al. [1] misinterpreted the current scientific evidence about the potential effect of LIPA on health.

First, the best observational evidence linking LIPA and health indicates that LIPA is unlikely to confer health benefits in the general population. In the review, the authors identified 37 cross-sectional and three longitudinal [2, 3, 4] studies (keeping in mind that the latter is a more appropriate study...

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this letter.

Conflicts of Interest

Juan Pablo Rey-López has no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this letter.

References

  1. 1.
    Füzéki E, Engeroff T, Banzer W. Health benefits of light-intensity physical activity: a systematic review of accelerometer data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Sports Med. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0724-0 (Epub 10 Apr 2017).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beddhu S, Wei G, Marcus RL, et al. Light-intensity physical activities and mortality in the United States general population and CKD subpopulation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10:1145–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loprinzi PD. Light-intensity physical activity and all-cause mortality. Am J Health Promot. 2017;31:340–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fishman EI, Steeves JA, Zipunnikov V, et al. Association between objectively measured physical activity and mortality in NHANES. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(7):1303–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evenson KR, Wen F, Herring AH. Associations of accelerometry-assessed and self-reported physical activity and sedentary behavior with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;184(9):621–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grosso G, Godos J, Galvano F, et al. Coffee, caffeine, and health outcomes: an umbrella review. Annu Rev Nutr. 2017;37:131–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li J, Zhang W, Guo Q, et al. Duration of exercise as a key determinant of improvement in insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes patients. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2012;227:289–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Houmard JA, Tanner CJ, Slentz CA, et al. Effect of the volume and intensity of exercise training on insulin sensitivity. J Appl Physiol. 1985;2004(96):101–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kraus WE, Houmard JA, Duscha BD, et al. Effects of the amount and intensity of exercise on plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1483–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibala MJ, Hawley JA. Sprinting toward fitness. Cell Metab. 2017;25(5):988–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations