The evolution of performance analysis within sports sciences is tied to technology development and practitioner demands. However, how individual and collective patterns self-organize and interact in invasive team sports remains elusive. Social network analysis has been recently proposed to resolve some aspects of this problem, and has proven successful in capturing collective features resulting from the interactions between team members as well as a powerful communication tool. Despite these advances, some fundamental team sports concepts such as an attacking play have not been properly captured by the more common applications of social network analysis to team sports performance. In this article, we propose a novel approach to team sports performance centered on sport concepts, namely that of an attacking play. Network theory and tools including temporal and bipartite or multilayered networks were used to capture this concept. We put forward eight questions directly related to team performance to discuss how common pitfalls in the use of network tools for capturing sports concepts can be avoided. Some answers are advanced in an attempt to be more precise in the description of team dynamics and to uncover other metrics directly applied to sport concepts, such as the structure and dynamics of attacking plays. Finally, we propose that, at this stage of knowledge, it may be advantageous to build up from fundamental sport concepts toward complex network theory and tools, and not the other way around.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This work was partly supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, under Grant UID/DTP/UI447/2013 to CIPER—Centro Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Performance Humana (unit 447).
Conflict of interest
João Ramos, Rui J. Lopes, and Duarte Araújo have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this review.
Passos P, Araújo D, Volossovitch A. Performance analysis in team sports. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017.Google Scholar
Glazier PS. Game, set and match? Substantive issues and future directions in performance analysis. Sports Med. 2010;40(8):625–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hughes M, Franks IM. The essentials of performance analysis: an introduction, vol. xxxii. London: Routledge; 2008. p. 312.Google Scholar
Frencken W. Soccer tactics: dynamics of small-sided games and full-sized matches. Groningen: University of Groningen—Faculty of Medical Sciences; 2012.Google Scholar
Vilar L, Araújo D, Davids K, et al. The role of ecological dynamics in analysing performance in team sports. Sports Med. 2012;42(1):1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bartlett R, Button C, Robins M, et al. Analysing team coordination patterns from player movement trajectories in soccer: methodological considerations. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2012;12(2):398–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davids K, Araújo D, Shuttleworth R. Applications of dynamical systems theory to football. Sci Footb V. 2005;537:550.Google Scholar
Newman MEJ. Networks: an introduction, vol. xi. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandes U, Freeman L, Wagner D. Social networks. In: RT, editor. Handbook of graph drawing and visualization. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2012.Google Scholar
Eccles DW, Tenenbaum G. Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: a cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004;26:542–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte R, Araújo D, Freire L, et al. Intra-and inter-group coordination patterns reveal collective behaviors of football players near the scoring zone. Hum Mov Sci. 2012;31(6):1639–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bender-deMoll S, McFarland DA. The art and science of dynamic network visualization. J Soc Struct. 2006;7(2):1–38.Google Scholar
Hill SA, Braha D. Dynamic model of time-dependent complex networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010;82(4):046105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar