How Biomechanical Improvements in Running Economy Could Break the 2-hour Marathon Barrier
- 2.5k Downloads
A sub-2-hour marathon requires an average velocity (5.86 m/s) that is 2.5% faster than the current world record of 02:02:57 (5.72 m/s) and could be accomplished with a 2.7% reduction in the metabolic cost of running. Although supporting body weight comprises the majority of the metabolic cost of running, targeting the costs of forward propulsion and leg swing are the most promising strategies for reducing the metabolic cost of running and thus improving marathon running performance. Here, we calculate how much time could be saved by taking advantage of unconventional drafting strategies, a consistent tailwind, a downhill course, and specific running shoe design features while staying within the current International Association of Athletic Federations regulations for record purposes. Specifically, running in shoes that are 100 g lighter along with second-half scenarios of four runners alternately leading and drafting, or a tailwind of 6.0 m/s, combined with a 42-m elevation drop could result in a time well below the 2-hour marathon barrier.
KeywordsMetabolic Cost Support Body Weight World Record Ethylene Vinyl Acetate Ethylene Vinyl Acetate
The authors thank Owen Beck, Len Brownlie, Dan Judelson, and Geng Luo for fruitful discussions, Elissa Johnson for illustrations, and Sean Hartnett for the Berlin 2014 split time data.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.
Conflict of interest
Wouter Hoogkamer and Christopher Arellano have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review. Rodger Kram is a paid consultant to Nike, Inc., which is engaged in a sub-2-hour marathon project. The views expressed in this manuscript do not represent those of Nike, Inc.
- 6.Caesar E. Two hours: the quest to run the impossible marathon. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2015.Google Scholar
- 7.Tucker R, Santos-Concejero J. An imminent sub 2-hours marathon is unlikely: historical trends of the gender gap in running events. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. Epub 14 December 2016.Google Scholar
- 8.Hutchinson A. What will it take to run a 2-hour marathon. Runner’s world. http://rw.runnersworld.com/sub-2.
- 9.Nike introduces breaking2: the quest to break the two-hour marathon barrier. Nike News; 2016 December 12. http://news.nike.com/news/2-hour-marathon.
- 10.Germano S. Adidas, like Nike, is working on sub-2 hour marathon project. Wall Street J. 2016 Dec 16. https://www.wsj.com/articles/adidas-like-nike-is-working-on-sub-2-hour-marathon-project-1481886001.
- 11.Sub2. Countdown to the first sub2hr marathon: no longer a matter of if but rather when. http://www.sub2hrs.com/.
- 25.Frederick EC, Daniels JT, Hayes JW. The effect of shoe weight on the aerobic demands of running. In: Bachl N, Prokop L, Suckert R, editors. Curr Top Sports Med Proc World Congr Sports Med. Vienna: Urban and Schwarzenberg; 1984. p. 616–25.Google Scholar
- 31.Batliner M. Does VO2 increase linearly with speed in average and sub-elite distance runners?. Boulder: University of Colorado; 2013.Google Scholar
- 42.Daniels JT, Gilbert J. Oxygen power: performance tables for distance runners. Tempe, AZ: Daniels and Gilbert; 1979.Google Scholar
- 60.International Association of Athletics Federations. Competition rules 2016–2017. Monaco: International Association of Athletics Federations; 2015.Google Scholar
- 64.International Association of Athletics Federations. Records and lists: top lists. Senior outdoor half marathon men. https://www.iaaf.org/records/toplists/road-running/half-marathon/outdoor/men/senior.
- 75.Beck ON, Taboga P, Grabowski AM. Reduced prosthetic stiffness lowers the metabolic cost of running for athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations. J Appl Physiol. 2017. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00587.2016.
- 76.Frederick EC, Clarke TE, Larsen JL, et al. The effects of shoe cushioning on the oxygen demands of running. In: Nigg BM, Kerr BA, editors. Biomechanical aspects of sports shoes and playing surfaces. Calgary: The University of Calgary; 1983. p. 107–14.Google Scholar
- 78.Frederick EC, Howley ET, Powers SK. Lower O2 cost while running on air cushion type shoe. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980;12:81–2.Google Scholar