Effect of Plyometric Training on Vertical Jump Performance in Female Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- 2.2k Downloads
Plyometric training is an effective method to prevent knee injuries in female athletes; however, the effects of plyometric training on jump performance in female athletes is unclear.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of plyometric training on vertical jump (VJ) performance of amateur, collegiate and elite female athletes.
Six electronic databases were searched (PubMed, MEDLINE, ERIC, Google Scholar, SCIndex and ScienceDirect). The included studies were coded for the following criteria: training status, training modality and type of outcome measures. The methodological quality of each study was assessed using the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale. The effects of plyometric training on VJ performance were based on the following standardised pre–post testing effect size (ES) thresholds: trivial (<0.20), small (0.21–0.60), moderate (0.61–1.20), large (1.21–2.00), very large (2.01–4.00) and extremely large (>4.00).
A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that plyometric training had a most likely moderate effect on countermovement jump (CMJ) height performance (ES = 1.09; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.57–1.61; I 2 = 75.60 %). Plyometric training interventions of less than 10 weeks in duration had a most likely small effect on CMJ height performance (ES = 0.58; 95 % CI 0.25–0.91). In contrast, plyometric training durations greater than 10 weeks had a most likely large effect on CMJ height (ES = 1.87; 95 % CI 0.73–3.01). The effect of plyometric training on concentric-only squat jump (SJ) height was likely small (ES = 0.44; 95 % CI −0.09 to 0.97). Similar effects were observed on SJ height after 6 weeks of plyometric training in amateur (ES = 0.35) and young (ES = 0.49) athletes, respectively. The effect of plyometric training on CMJ height with the arm swing was likely large (ES = 1.31; 95 % CI −0.04 to 2.65). The largest plyometric training effects were observed in drop jump (DJ) height performance (ES = 3.59; 95 % CI −3.04 to 10.23). Most likely extremely large plyometric training effects on DJ height performance (ES = 7.07; 95 % CI 4.71–9.43) were observed following 12 weeks of plyometric training. In contrast, a possibly small positive training effect (ES = 0.30; 95 % CI −0.63 to 1.23) was observed following 6 weeks of plyometric training.
Plyometric training is an effective form of training to improve VJ performance (e.g. CMJ, SJ and DJ) in female athletes. The benefits of plyometric training on VJ performance are greater for interventions of longer duration (≥10 weeks).
KeywordsFemale Athlete Vertical Jump Jump Performance Squat Jump Drop Jump
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review.
Conflict of interest
Emilija Stojanović, Vladimir Ristić, Daniel Travis McMaster and Zoran Milanović declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.
- 1.Ives JC. Motor behavior: connecting mind and body for optimal performance. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.Google Scholar
- 2.Asadi A. Effects of six weeks depth jump and countermovement jump training on agility performance. J Sports Sci. 2012;5(1):67–70.Google Scholar
- 3.Holcomb WR, Lander JE, Rutland RM, et al. The effectiveness of a modified plyometric program on power and the vertical jump. J Strength Cond Res. 1996;10(2):89–92.Google Scholar
- 5.Chu DA. Jumping into plyometrics. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1998.Google Scholar
- 20.Ignjatović A, Radovanović D. Physiological basis of force and strength training. Jagodina: Pedagogical Faculty; 2013.Google Scholar
- 26.Weiss LW, Relyea GE, Ashley CD, et al. Using velocity-spectrum squats and body composition to predict standing vertical jump ability. J Strength Cond Res. 1997;11(1):14–20.Google Scholar
- 29.Kellis SE, Tsitskaris GK, Nikopoulou MD, et al. The evaluation of jumping ability of male and female basketball players according to their chronological age and major leagues. J Strength Cond Res. 1999;13(1):40–6.Google Scholar
- 36.Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther Sport. 2003;83(8):713–21.Google Scholar
- 44.Usman T, Shenoy K. Effects of lower body plyometric training on vertical jump performance and pulmonary function in male and female collegiate volleyball players. Int J Appl Exerc Physiol. 2015;4(2):9–19.Google Scholar
- 49.Ozbar N. Effects of plyometric training on explosive strength, speed and kicking speed in female soccer players. Anthropologist. 2015;19(2):333–9.Google Scholar
- 52.Attene G, Iuliano E, Di Cagno A, et al. Improving neuromuscular performance in young basketball players: plyometric vs. technique training. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2014;55(1–2):1–8.Google Scholar
- 57.MacDougall D, Sale D. The physiology of training for high performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.Google Scholar