Efficacy of Exercise Intervention for Weight Loss in Overweight and Obese Adolescents: Meta-Analysis and Implications
- 1.8k Downloads
The global rise in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents has been linked to modifiable lifestyle factors, including lack of physical activity. However, no known meta-analysis has been conducted on the effects of exercise intervention on body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight and obese adolescents.
The aim of this study was to (1) estimate whether exercise intervention meaningfully improves body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight and obese adolescents; and (2) discuss the implications of the findings in terms of primary healthcare provision and public health policy, using New Zealand as an exemplar context.
Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, Google Scholar) from inception to May 2015. The reference lists of eligible articles and relevant reviews were also checked.
Inclusion criteria were (1) randomized controlled trial; (2) structured exercise intervention, alone or combined with any other kind of intervention; (3) control group received no structured exercise or behavioural modification designed to increase physical activity; (4) participants overweight or obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥85th percentile); and (5) participants aged between 10 and 19 years.
Appraisal and Synthesis Methods
Initially, 1667 articles were identified. After evaluation of study characteristics, quality and validity, data from 13 articles (15 trials) involving 556 participants (176 male, 193 female, 187 unknown) were extracted for meta-analysis. Meta-analyses were completed on five body composition parameters and ten cardiometabolic parameters. Effect sizes (ESs) were calculated as mean differences, as well as standardized mean differences in order to determine effect magnitude.
Exercise intervention reduced BMI (mean 2.0 kg/m2, 95 % CI 1.5–2.5; ES moderate), body weight (mean 3.7 kg, 95 % CI 1.7–5.8; ES small), body fat percentage (3.1 %, 95 % CI 2.2–4.1; ES small), waist circumference (3.0 cm, 95 % CI 1.3–4.8; ES small), but the increase (improvement) in lean mass was trivial (mean 1.6 kg, 95 % CI 0.5–2.6). The response to an oral glucose tolerance test following exercise intervention was for a decrease in the area under the curve for insulin (mean 162 μU/μl, 95 % CI 93–231; ES large) and blood glucose (mean 39 mg/dl, 95 % CI 9.4–69; ES moderate). Improvements in the homeostatic model assessment were also noted (mean 1.0, 95 % CI 0.7–1.4; ES moderate) and systolic blood pressure (mean 7.1 mmHg, 95 % CI 3.5–10.7; ES moderate). The effects of exercise on total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fasting insulin and fasting blood glucose were inconclusive.
Most of the included trials were short term (6–36 weeks) and 13 had methodological limitations. Additionally, the meta-analyses for some of the secondary outcomes had a small number of participants or substantial statistical heterogeneity.
The current evidence suggests that exercise intervention in overweight and obese adolescents improves body composition, particularly by lowering body fat. The limited available evidence further indicates that exercise intervention may improve some cardiometabolic risk factors.
KeywordsOral Glucose Tolerance Test Strength Training Exercise Intervention Standardize Mean Difference Obese Adolescent
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.
Conflict of interest
Lee Stoner, David Rowlands, Ariel Morrison, Daniel Credeur, Michael Hamlin, Kim Gaffney, Danielle Lambrick and Anna Matheson declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.
- 2.Triggle CR. Exercise ‘not key to obesity fight’. 2015. http://www.bbc.com/news/health/32417699. Accessed 14 May 2015.
- 3.Royal Society for Public Health. Mixed messages surrounding diet and exercise risk confusing the public. 2015. https://www.rsph.org.uk/en/about-us/latest-news/index.cfm/pid/ADAA562D-5FBA-4082-A4E5F076A16EA3AB. Accessed 14 May 2015.
- 4.OECD. OECD Obesity Update 2014. http://www.oecd.org/health/obesity-update.htm. Accessed 15 Apr 2016.
- 7.World Health Organization. Plan of action of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity. 2014. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/end-childhood-obesity/action-plan/en/. Accessed 26 May 2014.
- 12.Lieberman D. The story of the human body: evolution, health, and disease. 1st ed. London: Pantheon; 2013.Google Scholar
- 14.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Basics about childhood obesity. 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/basics.html. Accessed 12 May 2015.
- 15.Higgins J, Green S, Cochrane Collaboration, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley; 2008.Google Scholar
- 19.Hopkins WG. A spreadsheet for deriving a confidence interval, mechanistic inference and clinical inference from a p value. Sport Sci. 2007;11:16–20.Google Scholar
- 22.Ryan R. Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group: meta-analysis. http://cccrg.cochrane.org. Accessed 17 May 2015.
- 50.World Health Organization. The World Health report 2002. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.Google Scholar
- 61.World Health Organization. Global nutrition targets 2025: childhood overweight policy brief (WHO/NMH/NHD/14.6). Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2014.Google Scholar
- 67.Exercise is Medicine Network: Pediatrics. http://www.exerciseismedicine.org/support_page.php?p=87. Accessed 21 May 2015.
- 73.Cornwall J, Stoner L. School-based health interventions should be assessed with measures of fitness and fatness: comment on ‘Beyond the randomised controlled trial and BMI: evaluation of effectiveness of through-school nutrition and physical activity programmes’. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(11):2094.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 76.Barrett SC, Huffman FG, Johnson P. Validation of finger-prick testing of fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, and HbA1c in adolescents. J Near-Patient Test Tech. 2011;10(2):51–8.Google Scholar
- 77.Ministry of Health. Healthy Families NZ. 2015. http://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/preventative-health-wellness/healthy-families-nz. Accessed 6 Jun 2015.
- 78.Healthy Together Victoria. 2015. http://www.healthytogether.vic.gov.au/. Accessed 6 Jun 2015.
- 83.Martinez-Gomez D, Veiga OL, Gomez-Martinez S, et al. Behavioural correlates of active commuting to school in Spanish adolescents: the AFINOS (Physical Activity as a Preventive Measure Against Overweight, Obesity, Infections, Allergies, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Adolescents) study. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(10):1779–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 84.Tricket E, Beehler S, Deutsch C, et al. Advancing the science of community-level interventions. Fram Health Matters. 2011;101(8):1410–9.Google Scholar