Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 46, Issue 11, pp 1619–1645 | Cite as

Advances in Sprint Acceleration Profiling for Field-Based Team-Sport Athletes: Utility, Reliability, Validity and Limitations

  • Kim D. Simperingham
  • John B. Cronin
  • Angus Ross
Systematic Review

Abstract

Background

Advanced testing technologies enable insight into the kinematic and kinetic determinants of sprint acceleration performance, which is particularly important for field-based team-sport athletes. Establishing the reliability and validity of the data, particularly from the acceleration phase, is important for determining the utility of the respective technologies.

Objective

The aim of this systematic review was to explain the utility, reliability, validity and limitations of (1) radar and laser technology, and (2) non-motorised treadmill (NMT) and torque treadmill (TT) technology for providing kinematic and kinetic measures of sprint acceleration performance.

Data Sources

A comprehensive search of the CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE (EBSCO), PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was conducted using search terms that included radar, laser, non-motorised treadmill, torque treadmill, sprint, acceleration, kinetic, kinematic, force, and power.

Methods

Studies examining the kinematics or kinetics of short (≤10 s), maximal-effort sprint acceleration in adults or children, which included an assessment of reliability or validity of the advanced technologies of interest, were included in this systematic review. Absolute reliability, relative reliability and validity data were extracted from the selected articles and tabulated. The level of acceptance of reliability was a coefficient of variation (CV) ≤10 % and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) or correlation coefficient (r) ≥0.70.

Results

A total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. Generally acceptable validity (r = 0.87–0.99; absolute bias 3–7 %), intraday reliability (CV ≤9.5 %; ICC/r ≥0.84) and interday reliability (ICC ≥0.72) were reported for data from radar and laser. However, low intraday reliability was reported for the theoretical maximum horizontal force (ICC 0.64) within adolescent athletes, and low validity was reported for velocity during the initial 5 m of a sprint acceleration (bias up to 0.41 m/s) measured with a laser device. Acceptable reliability of results from NMT and TT was only ensured when testing protocols involved sufficient familiarisation, a high sampling rate (≥200 Hz), a ‘blocked’ start position, and the analysis of discrete steps rather than arbitrary time periods. Sprinting times and speeds were 20–28 % slower on a TT, 28–67 % slower on an NMT, and only 9–64 % of the variance in overground measurements of speed and time (≤30 m) was explained by results from an NMT. There have been no reports to date of criterion validity of kinetic measures of sprint acceleration performance on NMT andTT, and only limited results regarding acceptable concurrent validity of radar-derived kinetic data.

Conclusions

Radar, laser, NMT and TT technologies can be used to reliably measure sprint acceleration performance and to provide insight into the determinants of sprinting speed. However, further research is required to establish the validity of the kinetic measurements made with NMT and TT. Radar and laser technology may not be suitable for measuring the first few steps of a sprint acceleration.

Keywords

Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Sprint Performance Split Time Relative Reliability Absolute Bias 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

No funding was received directly for this review. Kim Simperingham was funded by an Auckland University of Technology Vice Chancellor’s doctoral scholarship. This review contributes to his PhD qualification.

Conflicts of interest

Kim Simperingham, John Cronin and Angus Ross declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

References

  1. 1.
    Vigne G, Gaudino C, Rogowski I, et al. Activity profile in elite Italian soccer team. Int J Sports Med. 2010;31(5):304–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lindsay A, Draper N, Lewis J, et al. Positional demands of professional rugby. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(6):480–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spencer M, Bishop D, Dawson B, et al. Physiological and metabolic responses of repeated-sprint activities: specific to field-based team sports. Sports Med. 2005;35(12):1025–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gabbett TG. Sprinting patterns of national rugby league competition. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(1):121–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kawamori N, Nosaka K, Newton RU. Relationships between ground reaction impulse and sprint acceleration performance in team sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(3):568–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kawamori N, Newton RU, Hori N, et al. Effects of weighted sled towing with heavy versus light load on sprint acceleration ability. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;28(10):2738–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cronin JB, Templeton RL. Timing light height affects sprint times. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(1):318–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duthie GM, Pyne DB, Ross AA, et al. The reliability of ten-meter sprint time using different starting techniques. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(2):246–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mendez-Villanueva A, Buchheit M. Football-specific fitness testing: adding value or confirming the evidence? J Sports Sci. 2013;31(13):1503–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weyand PG, Sternlight DB, Bellizzi MJ, et al. Faster top running speeds are achieved with greater ground forces not more rapid leg movements. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(5):1991–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brughelli M, Cronin J, Chaouachi A. Effects of running velocity on running kinetics and kinematics. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(4):933–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nummela A, Keranen T, Mikkelsson LO. Factors related to top running speed and economy. Int J Sports Med. 2007;28(8):655–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morin JB, Bourdin M, Edouard P, et al. Mechanical determinants of 100-m sprint running performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(11):3921–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hunter JP, Marshall RN, McNair PJ. Relationships between ground reaction force impulse and kinematics of sprint-running acceleration. J Appl Biomech. 2005;21(1):31–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kugler F, Janshen L. Body position determines propulsive forces in accelerated running. J Biomech. 2010;43(2):343–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rabita G, Dorel S, Slawinski J, et al. Sprint mechanics in world-class athletes: a new insight into the limits of human locomotion. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(5):583–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    di Prampero P, Botter A, Osgnach C. The energy cost of sprint running and the role of metabolic power in setting top performances. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;115(3):451–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gander RE, McClements JD, Sanderson LK, et al. Sprint start instrumentation. IEEE Trans Intrum Meas. 1994;43(4):637–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morin JB, Jeannin T, Chevallier B, et al. Spring-mass model characteristics during sprint running: correlation with performance and fatigue-induced changes. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27(2):158–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Debaere S, Jonkers I, Delecluse C. The contribution of step characteristics to sprint running performance in high-level male and female athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(1):116–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morin JB, Seve P. Sprint running performance: comparison between treadmill and field conditions. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(8):1695–703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Samozino P, Rabita G, Dorel S, et al. A simple method for measuring power, force, velocity properties, and mechanical effectiveness in sprint running. Scand J Med Sci Sports (Epub 21 May 2015).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    di Prampero PE, Fusi S, Sepulcri L, et al. Sprint running: a new energetic approach. J Exp Biol. 2005;208(Pt 14):2809–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lakomy HKA. The use of non-motorized treadmill for analysing sprint performance. Ergonomics. 1987;30(4):627–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Frishberg BA. An analysis of overground and treadmill sprinting. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;15(6):478–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McKenna M, Riches PE. A comparison of sprinting kinematics on two types of treadmill and over-ground. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007;17(6):649–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brughelli M, Cronin J, Mendiguchia J, et al. Contralateral leg deficits in kinetic and kinematic variables during running in Australian Rules football players with previous hamstring injuries. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(9):2539–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yanagiya T, Kanehisa H, Kouzaki M, et al. Effect of gender on mechanical power output during repeated bouts of maximal running in trained teenagers. Int J Sports Med. 2003;24(4):304–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chelly SM, Denis C. Leg power and hopping stiffness: relationship with sprint running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(2):326–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morin JB, Samozino P, Bonnefoy R, et al. Direct measurement of power during one single sprint on treadmill. J Biomech. 2010;43(10):1970–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Harrison AJ, Jensen RL, Donoghue O. A comparison of laser and video techniques for determining displacement and velocity during running. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2005;9(4):219–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Malina RM, Eisenmann JC, Cumming SP, et al. Maturity-associated variation in the growth and functional capacities of youth football (soccer) players 13–15 years. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;91(5–6):555–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rumpf MC, Cronin JB, Oliver JL, et al. Vertical and leg stiffness and stretch-shortening cycle changes across maturation during maximal sprint running. Hum Mov Sci. 2013;32(4):668–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000;30(1):1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. [Methodes statistiques pour evaluer le taux d ‘ erreur (la fiabilite) des variables ayant rapport a la medecine du sport]. Sports Med. 1998;26(4):217–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vincent WJ. Statistics in kinesiology. 3rd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2005.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Morin J-B, Edouard P, Samozino P. Technical ability of force application as a determinant factor of sprint performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(9):1680–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bezodis NE, Salo AIT, Trewartha G. Measurement error in estimates of sprint velocity from a laser displacement measurement device. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33(6):439–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ferro A, Floría P, Villacieros J, et al. Validez y fiabilidad del sensor láser del sistema BioLaserSport® para el análisis de la velocidad de la carrera. [Validity and reliability of the laser sensor of BioLaserSport® system for the analysis of the running velocity]. Rev Int Cienc Deporte. 2012;8(30):357–70.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Delecluse C, Roelants M, Diels R, et al. Effects of whole body vibration training on muscle strength and sprint performance in sprint-trained athletes. Int J Sports Med. 2005;26(8):662–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Buchheit M, Samozino P, Glynn JA, et al. Mechanical determinants of acceleration and maximal sprinting speed in highly trained young soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(20):1906–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stalker ATS II Professional Sports Radar: owner’s manual. Stalker Radar; 2010.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Samozino P, Rejc E, Di Prampero PE, et al. Optimal force-velocity profile in ballistic movements—altius: citius or fortius? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(2):313–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Samozino P, Morin JB, Hintzy F, et al. Jumping ability: a theoretical integrative approach. J Theor Biol. 2010;264(1):11–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lakomy J, Haydon DT. The effects of enforced, rapid deceleration on performance in a multiple sprint test. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(3):579–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Berthoin S, Dupont G, Mary P, et al. Predicting sprint kinematic parameters from anaerobic field tests in physical education students. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(1):75–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Highton JM, Lamb KL, Twist C, et al. The reliability and validity of short-distance sprint performance assessed on a nonmotorized treadmill. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(2):458–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hughes MG, Doherty M, Tong RJ, et al. Reliability of repeated sprint exercise in non-motorised treadmill ergometry. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27(11):900–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sirotic AC, Coutts AJ. The reliability of physiological and performance measures during simulated team-sport running on a non-motorised treadmill. J Sci Med Sport. 2008;11(5):500–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tong RJ, Bell W, Ball G, et al. Reliability of power output measurements during repeated treadmill sprinting in rugby players. J Sports Sci. 2001;19(4):289–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Oliver JL, Williams CA, Armstrong N. Reliability of a field and laboratory test of repeated sprint ability. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2006;18(3):339–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chia M, Lim JM. Concurrent validity of power output derived from the non-motorised treadmill test in sedentary adults. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008;37(4):279–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jaskolski A, Veenstra B, Goossens P, et al. Optimal resistance for maximal power during treadmill running. Sports Med Training Rehab. 1996;7(1):17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lim JM, Chia MY. Reliability of power output derived from the nonmotorized treadmill test. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(3):993–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cross MR, Brughelli ME, Cronin JB. Effects of vest loading on sprint kinetics and kinematics. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(7):1867–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hopker JG, Coleman DA, Wiles JD, et al. Familiarisation and reliability of sprint test indices during laboratory and field assessment. J Sports Sci Med. 2009;8(4):528–32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rumpf MC. Sprint running kinetics and kinematics in youth [unpublished doctoral thesis]. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology; 2012.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yanagiya T, Kanehisa H, Tachi M, et al. Mechanical power during maximal treadmill walking and running in young and elderly men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;92(1–2):33–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zois J, Bishop D, Fairweather I, et al. High-intensity re-warm-ups enhance soccer performance. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(9):800–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Serpiello FR, McKenna MJ, Stepto NK, et al. Performance and physiological responses to repeated-sprint exercise: a novel multiple-set approach. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(4):669–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Nédélec M, Berthoin S, Dupont G. Reproductibilité de la performance lors d’un test de répétition de sprints. [Reliability of performance during a repeated sprint test]. Sci Sports. 2012;27(1):46–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Nédélec M, McCall A, Carling C, et al. Physical performance and subjective ratings after a soccer-specific exercise simulation: comparison of natural grass versus artificial turf. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(5):529–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sweeney KM, Wright GA, Brice AG, et al. The effect of ß-alanine supplementation on power performance during repeated sprint activity. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(1):79–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Takai Y, Fukunaga Y, Fujita E, et al. Effects of body mass-based squat training in adolescent boys. J Sports Sci Med. 2013;12(1):60–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Winter EM, Jones AM, Davidson RCR, et al. Sport and exercise physiology testing guidelines. Oxon: Routledge; 2007.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Samozino P, Morin J-B, Dorel S, et al. A simple method for measuring power, force and velocity properties of sprint running. XXIV Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics. 4–9 Aug 2013; Brazil.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mann RV. The mechanics of sprinting and hurdling. USA: Createspace; 2011.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bushnell T, Hunter I. Differences in technique between sprinters and distance runners at equal and maximal speeds. Sports Biomech. 2007;6(3):261–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lockie RG, Murphy AJ, Callaghan SJ, et al. Effects of sprint and plyometics training on field sport acceleration technique. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(7):1790–801.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lockie RG, Murphy AJ, Schultz AB, et al. The effects of different speed training protocols on sprint acceleration kinematics and muscle strength and power in field sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(6):1539–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Weyand PG, Sandell RF, Prime DNL, et al. The biological limits to running speed are imposed from the ground up. J Appl Physiol. 2010;108(4):950–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Nevill AM, Holder RL, Cooper S-M. Statistics, truth, and error reduction in sport and exercise sciences. Eur J Sport Sci. 2007;7(1):9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Draper JA, Lancaster MG. The 505 test: a test for agility in the horizontal plane. Aust J Sci Med Sport. 1985;17(1):15–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim D. Simperingham
    • 1
    • 3
  • John B. Cronin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Angus Ross
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ) at AUT MillenniumAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health SciencesEdith Cowan UniversityPerthAustralia
  3. 3.High Performance Sport New Zealand (HPSNZ)AucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations