Ageing, Muscle Power and Physical Function: A Systematic Review and Implications for Pragmatic Training Interventions
- 1.3k Downloads
The physiological impairments most strongly associated with functional performance in older people are logically the most efficient therapeutic targets for exercise training interventions aimed at improving function and maintaining independence in later life.
The objectives of this review were to (1) systematically review the relationship between muscle power and functional performance in older people; (2) systematically review the effect of power training (PT) interventions on functional performance in older people; and (3) identify components of successful PT interventions relevant to pragmatic trials by scoping the literature.
Our approach involved three stages. First, we systematically reviewed evidence on the relationship between muscle power, muscle strength and functional performance and, second, we systematically reviewed PT intervention studies that included both muscle power and at least one index of functional performance as outcome measures. Finally, taking a strong pragmatic perspective, we conducted a scoping review of the PT evidence to identify the successful components of training interventions needed to provide a minimally effective training dose to improve physical function.
Evidence from 44 studies revealed a positive association between muscle power and indices of physical function, and that muscle power is a marginally superior predictor of functional performance than muscle strength. Nine studies revealed maximal angular velocity of movement, an important component of muscle power, to be positively associated with functional performance and a better predictor of functional performance than muscle strength. We identified 31 PT studies, characterised by small sample sizes and incomplete reporting of interventions, resulting in less than one-in-five studies judged as having a low risk of bias. Thirteen studies compared traditional resistance training with PT, with ten studies reporting the superiority of PT for either muscle power or functional performance. Further studies demonstrated the efficacy of various methods of resistance and functional task PT on muscle power and functional performance, including low-load PT and low-volume interventions.
Maximal intended movement velocity, low training load, simple training methods, low-volume training and low-frequency training were revealed as components offering potential for the development of a pragmatic intervention. Additionally, the research area is dominated by short-term interventions producing short-term gains with little consideration of the long-term maintenance of functional performance. We believe the area would benefit from larger and higher-quality studies and consideration of optimal long-term strategies to develop and maintain muscle power and physical function over years rather than weeks.
KeywordsPhysical Function Standardise Mean Difference Functional Performance Muscle Power Short Physical Performance Battery
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This review was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit. The views expressed are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
Conflicts of interest
Christopher Byrne, Charles Faure, David Keene and Sarah Lamb declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.
- 6.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9 (W64).Google Scholar
- 7.Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. Available from http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
- 17.Schenkman M, Riley PO, Pieper C. Sit to stand from progressively lower seat heights—alterations in angular velocity. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996;11(3):153–8.Google Scholar
- 67.Petrella JK, Kim JS, Tuggle SC, et al. Age differences in knee extension power, contractile velocity, and fatigability. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;98(1):211–20.Google Scholar
- 69.Miller MS, Bedrin NG, Callahan DM, et al. Age-related slowing of myosin actin cross-bridge kinetics is sex specific and predicts decrements in whole skeletal muscle performance in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013;115(7):1004–14.Google Scholar
- 70.Reid KF, Pasha E, Doros G, et al. Longitudinal decline of lower extremity muscle power in healthy and mobility-limited older adults: influence of muscle mass, strength, composition, neuromuscular activation and single fiber contractile properties. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114(1):29–39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 81.Macaluso A, Young A, Gibb KS, et al. Cycling as a novel approach to resistance training increases muscle strength, power, and selected functional abilities in healthy older women. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003;95(6):2544–53.Google Scholar
- 112.Signorile JF, Carmel MP, Lai S, et al. Early plateaus of power and torque gains during high- and low-speed resistance training of older women. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;98(4):1213–20.Google Scholar
- 113.van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, et al. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(12):1290–9.Google Scholar
- 116.Delmonico MJ, Kostek MC, Doldo NA, et al. Effects of moderate-velocity strength training on peak muscle power and movement velocity: do women respond differently than men? J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;99(5):1712–8.Google Scholar