Sports Medicine

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 559–588 | Cite as

Application of Global Positioning System and Microsensor Technology in Competitive Rugby League Match-Play: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Joanne Hausler
  • Mark Halaki
  • Rhonda OrrEmail author
Systematic Review



The use of global positioning system (GPS) devices with the inclusion of microsenor technology in rugby league enables measurement of player activity profiles to understand the demands of match-play and optimise on-field performance.


The aim of this review was to systematically review the use of GPS and microsensor technology to quantify player activity profiles in match-play, and conduct a meta-analysis of relevant movement variables in order to present the contemporary and emerging themes within rugby league.


A systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, and Google Scholar) from the earliest record to February 2015 was conducted. Permutations of key words included GPS, microtechnology, activity profiles, match demands (movement or physical demands), and rugby league. A meta-analysis was conducted to provide a pooled mean and confidence intervals on comparable data from at least three studies.


Twenty-seven studies met the eligibility criteria and included 1270 male participants. The studies reported on GPS use in elite competition (n = 16) with limited representation of other competition standards: sub-elite (n = 6), amateur (n = 1) and junior (n = 3). All studies reported on movement variables (distance, relative distance, speed and accelerations), with studies analysing movement at high speed (n = 18, 66.7 %), evaluating collision or impact variables (n = 15, 55.6 %) and determining the metabolic energy (n = 2, 7.4 %) associated with rugby league match-play. Activity profiles of varying positions, positional groups and levels of rugby league competition were described. Meta-analysis indicated that the total distance covered by backs and adjustables were both greater than forward positions, but adjustables covered greater relative distance than forwards and backs. Speed zones were typically categorised into six speed zones ranging from 0 to 36 km·h−1, or into low- and high-intensity movement. Vast inconsistencies were apparent across studies in categorising movement at high speed, posing difficulties for comparison. Meta-analysis indicated that, although the number of repeated high-intensity effort (RHIE) bouts in elite players were similar to sub-elite (and both greater than juniors), the number of efforts per RHIE were significantly greater in elite than sub-elite players. Differential pacing strategies were adopted according to player selection (whole-match vs. interchange), time period within match-play and match outcome, in order to maintain high-intensity performance or to challenge for a win. Sizeable inconsistencies were also identified in the definitions of reported collisions (classified as mild, moderate and heavy) and impacts (six zone categories provided by manufacturer), making comparisons across studies difficult. Collision profiles were different between competition standard and position where elite players and forwards sustained more moderate- and high-intensity collisions than sub-elite players and backs, respectively. The recent inclusion of GPS-derived metabolic indices to activity profiles has also accentuated the distinctive workloads of positional groups during match-play where adjustables demonstrate the highest energy expenditure and metabolic power.


This review and the results of the meta-analysis have demonstrated that positional groups have varied kinematic and metabolic demands. During match play, forwards sustain the greatest number of collisions and RHIE bouts, outside backs participate in more high-speed running and cover the greatest distance, and adjustables work at high intensity covering the greatest relative distance with the highest metabolic cost. Therefore, specific training for each positional group should address their match requirements. In addition, sub-elite players exhibit lower intensity of play compared with elite players, as indicated by lower relative distance and less number of efforts per RHIE bout despite similarities in total distance covered and number of RHIE bouts. To prepare them for elite-level play, their training should incorporate higher intensity drills in which greater relative distance and number of efforts per RHIE bout are performed. Furthermore, the lack of consistency in the definition of speed zones, high-intensity movement, collisions and impacts, underscores the difficulties encountered in meaningful comparisons of player activity profiles between studies. Consensus of these definitions would facilitate direct comparisons within rugby league.


Global Position System Pace Strategy Global Position System Measure Rugby League Metabolic Power 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Compliance with Ethical Standards


No funding was received for the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Joanne Hausler, Mark Halaki and Rhonda Orr declare there are no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.


  1. 1.
    Schutz Y, Chambaz A. Could a satellite-based navigation system (GPS) be used to assess the physical activity of individuals on earth? Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997;51:338–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cummins C, Orr R, O’Connor H, et al. Global positioning systems (GPS) and microtechnology sensors in team sports: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2013;43:1025–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McLellan CP, Lovell DI, Gass GC. Performance analysis of elite rugby league match play using global positioning systems. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:1703–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Waldron M, Twist C, Highton J. Movement and physiological match demands of elite rugby league using portable global positioning systems. J Sports Sci. 2011;29:1223–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aughey RJ. Applications of GPS technologies to field sports. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2011;6:295–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McLellan CP, Lovell DI. Neuromuscular responses to impact and collision during elite rugby league match play. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:1431–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cummins C, Orr R. Analysis of physical collisions in elite national rugby league match play. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10:732–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kempton T, Sirotic AC, Rampinini E. Metabolic power demands of rugby league match-play. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10:23–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gabbett TJ. Relationship between accelerometer load, collisions, and repeated high-intensity effort activity in rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:3424–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG, Abernethy B. Physical collisions and injury in professional rugby league match-play. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;14:210–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weaving D, Marshall P, Earle K, et al. Combining internal- and external-training-load measures in professional rugby league. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9:905–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sykes D, Nicholas C, Lamb K. An evaluation of the external validity and reliability of a rugby league match simulation protocol. J Sports Sci. 2012;31:48–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gabbett TJ. Quantifying the physical demands of collision sports: does microsensor technology measure what it claims to measure? J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:2319–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnston RJ, Watsford ML, Pine MJ. The validity and reliability of 5-Hz global positioning system units to measure team sport movement demands. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:758–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waldron M, Highton J, Twist C. The reliability of a rugby league movement-simulation protocol designed to replicate the performance of interchanged players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8:483–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waldron M, Worsfold P, Twist C. Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of a global positioning system (GPS) and timing gates to assess sprint performance variables. J Sports Sci. 2011;29:1613–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gray AJ, Jenkins D, Andrews MH. Validity and reliability of GPS for measuring distance travelled in field-based team sports. J Sports Sci. 2010;28:1319–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jennings D, Cormack S, Coutts AJ. The validity and reliability of GPS units for measuring distance in team sport specific running patterns. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5:328–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buchheit M, Al Haddad H, Simpson B. Monitoring accelerations with GPS in football: time to slow down? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9:442–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aughey RJ, Varley MC. Acceleration profiles in elite Australian soccer. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34:282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aughey RJ. Australian football player work rate: evidence of fatigue and pacing? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5:394–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gastin PB, McLean O, Spittle M, et al. Quantification of tackling demands in professional Australian football using integrated wearable athlete tracking technology. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16:589–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Higham DG, Pyne DB, Anson JM, et al. Movement patterns in rugby sevens: effects of tournament level, fatigue and substitute players. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15:277–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jones MR, West DJ, Crewther BT, et al. Quantifying positional and temporal movement patterns in professional rugby union using global positioning system. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(6):488–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boyd LJ, Ball K, Aughey RJ. The reliability of MinimaxX accelerometers for measuring physical activity in Australian football. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2011;6:311–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kelly SJ, Murphy AJ, Watsford ML, et al. Reliability and validity of sports accelerometers during static and dynamic testing. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10:106–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kelly D, Coughlan GF, Green BS, et al. Automatic detection of collisions in elite level rugby union using a wearable sensing device. Sports Eng. 2012;15:81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gastin PB, McLean OC, Breed RV, et al. Tackle and impact detection in elite Australian football using wearable microsensor technology. J Sports Sci. 2014;32:947–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chambers R, Gabbett TJ, Cole MH, et al. The use of wearable microsensors to quantify sport-specific movements. Sports Med. 2015;45:1065–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Walker EJ, McAinch AJ, Sweeting A, et al. Inertial sensors to estimate the energy expenditure of team-sport athletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.01.013.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Austin DJ, Kelly SJ. Positional differences in professional rugby league match play through the use of global positioning systems. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:14–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Eaves S, Broad G. A comparative analysis of professional rugby league football playing patterns between Australia and the United Kingdom. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2007;7:54–66.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Johnston RD, Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG. Applied sport science of rugby league. Sports Med. 2014;44(8):1087–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Di Prampero PE, Fusi S, Sepulcri L. Sprint running: a new energetic approach. J Exp Biol. 2005;208(Pt 14):2809–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, et al. Introduction to meta-analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haidich A. Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia. 2010;14:29–37.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Austin DJ, Kelly SJ. Professional rugby league positional match-play analysis through the use of global positioning system. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:187–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Black GM, Gabbett TJ. Match intensity and pacing strategies in rugby league: an examination of whole-game and interchange players, and winning and losing teams. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:1507–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Duffield R, Murphy A, Snape A. Post-match changes in neuromuscular function and the relationship to match demands in amateur rugby league matches. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;15:238–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gabbett TJ. Influence of playing standard on the physical demands of professional rugby league. J Sports Sci. 2013;31:1125–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gabbett TJ. Influence of the opposing team on the physical demands of elite rugby league match play. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:1629–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gabbett TJ. Influence of playing standard on the physical demands of junior rugby league tournament match-play. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17:212–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gabbett TJ. Effects of physical, technical and tactical factors on final ladder position in semiprofessional rugby league. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9:680–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG, Abernethy B. Physical demands of professional rugby league training and competition using microtechnology. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15:80–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gabbett TJ, Polley C, Dwyer DB. Influence of field position and phase of play on the physical demands of match-play in professional rugby league forwards. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17:556–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gabbett TJ, Seibold AJ. Relationship between tests of physical qualities, team selection, and physical match performance in semiprofessional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:3259–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gabbett TJ. Influence of ball-in-play time on the activity profiles of rugby league match-play. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:716–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hulin BT, Gabbett TJ, Kearney S, et al. Physical demands of match-play in successful and less-successful elite rugby league teams. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(6):703–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Johnston RD, Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG. Influence of an intensified competition on fatigue and match performance in junior rugby league players. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16:460–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kempton T, Sirotic AC, Cameron M. Match-related fatigue reduces physical and technical performance during elite rugby league match-play: a case study. J Sports Sci. 2013;31:1770–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kempton T, Sirotic AC, Coutts AJ. An integrated analysis of match-related fatigue in professional rugby league. J Sports Sci. 2015;33:39–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    McLellan CP, Lovell DI. Performance analysis of professional, semiprofessional, and junior elite rugby league match-play using Global Positioning Systems. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:3266–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    McLellan CP, Lovell DI, Gass GC. Biomechanical and endocrine responses to impact and collision during elite rugby league match play. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:1553–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Murray NB, Gabbett TJ, Chamari K. Effect of different between-match recovery times on the activity profiles and injury rates of national rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:3476–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Twist C, Highton J, Waldron M. Movement demands of elite rugby league players during Australian National Rugby League and European Super League Matches. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9:925–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Varley MC, Gabbett TJ, Aughey RJ. Activity profiles of professional soccer, rugby league and Australian football match play. J Sports Sci. 2014;32:1858–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Waldron M, Highton J, Daniels M, et al. Preliminary evidence of transient fatigue and pacing during interchanges in rugby league. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8:157–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Waldron M, Worsfold PR, Twist C. A three-season comparison of match performances among selected and unselected elite youth rugby league players. J Sports Sci. 2014;32:1110–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Osgnach C, Poser S, Bernardini R. Energy cost and metabolic power in elite soccer: a new match analysis approach. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(1):170–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sirotic AC, Coutts AJ, Knowles AJ. A comparison of match demands between elite and semi-elite rugby league competition. J Sports Sci. 2009;27:203–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gabbett T, Jenkins D, Abernethy B. Physical collisions and injury during professional rugby league skills training. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13:578–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Brewer J, Davis J. Applied physiology of rugby league. Sports Med. 1995;20:129–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Johnston RD, Gabbett TJ. Repeated-sprint and effort ability in rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:2789–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gabbett TJ. Physiological characteristics of junior and senior rugby league players. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36:334–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Woods CT, Raynor AJ, Bruce L, et al. Discriminating talent-identified junior Australian football players using a video decision-making task. J Sports Sci. 2015. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1053512.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    New South Wales Rugby League. Semi-Pro Day: recognising, educating and celebrating Players of the VB NSW Cup. New South Wales Rugby League, Moore Park. 2014.
  69. 69.
    New South Wales Rugby League. Semi-Pro Day: recognising and educating and celebrating Players of the VB NSW Cup. Moore Park: New South Wales Rugby League; 2015.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Doyle J. Elite pathways review. Moore Park: National Rugby League; 2013.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sirotic AC, Knowles H, Catterick C, et al. Positional match demands of professional rugby league competition. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:3076–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Austin DJ, Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DJ. Repeated high-intensity exercise in a professional rugby league. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:1898–904.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gabbett TJ. The development and application of an injury prediction model for noncontact, soft-tissue injuries in elite collision sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:2593–603.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Gabbett TJ, Domrow N. Relationships between training load, injury, and fitness in sub-elite collision sport athletes. J Sports Sci. 2007;25:1507–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Gabbett TJ, Ullah S. Relationship between running loads and soft-tissue injury in elite team sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:953–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Health SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations