Resisted Sled Sprint Training to Improve Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review
- 2.3k Downloads
Based on recent findings regarding the mechanical determinants of sprint performance, resisted sled sprint (RSS) training may provide an effective tool for the improvement of sprint acceleration and maximal velocity. However, the volume and intensity for effective RSS training in different populations is unclear.
The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of RSS training compared with unresisted sprint (URS) training, and the differential effects of sled load on RSS training outcomes.
Data Sources: Study Eligibility and Appraisal
A systematic review was performed primarily using PubMed and SPORTDiscus databases. Peer-reviewed studies were accepted only if the participants used a sled towing device for a longitudinal intervention of resisted sprint training, and if RSS training was the primary difference in training intervention between groups. Effect size (ES) reported using Cohen’s d was presented to compare the magnitude of effect between both dependent and independent groups.
A total of 11 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Sled loads were prescribed either as a percentage of body mass (%BM), a targeted reduction in velocity compared with unresisted sprint velocity (%V dec) or as an absolute load (kg). RSS training with ‘light’ (<10 %BM or <10 %V dec) loads provide ‘small’ decrements in acceleration (−1.5 %, ES = 0.50) to ‘moderate’ improvements in maximal sprint velocity (2.4 %, ES = 0.80) in sprint-trained individuals. ‘Moderate’ (10–19.9 %BM or 10–14.9 %V dec) to ‘very heavy’ (>30 %BM or >30 %V dec) sled loads provide ‘trivial’ to ‘extremely large’ improvements in acceleration performance (0.5–9.1 %, ES = 0.14–4.00) in strength-trained or team sport individuals. Whether RSS training is more effective than URS training in the improvement of acceleration or maximal sprint velocity remains equivocal.
RSS training is a novel training method with potential for the improvement of sprint performance, but its performance benefits over URS training remain to be conclusively demonstrated. Between-study comparisons are limited primarily by discrepancies in the training status and phase of the participants, and sled load prescription. Future work is required to define the optimal load and volume for RSS depending on the specific components of sprint performance to be enhanced.
KeywordsGround Reaction Force Stride Length Stride Frequency Sprint Performance Rugby Player
The authors wish to acknowledge the role of the anonymous reviewers for this article whose comments and suggestions improved the balance and breadth of the final manuscript. The authors appreciate the correspondence from authors of papers within this review who provided further data for calculations of effect size as reported within the text and tables.
Compliance with ethical standards
No funding was received in support of this work.
Conflict of interest
George Petrakos, Jean-Benoit Morin and Brendan Egan declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.
- 13.Lyttle AD, Wilson GJ, Ostrowski KJ. Enhancing performance: maximal power versus combined weights and plyometrics training. J Strength Cond Res. 1996;10(3):173–9.Google Scholar
- 14.Harris GR, Stone MH, O’Bryant HS, et al. Short-term performance effects of high power, high force, or combined weight-training methods. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14(1):14–20.Google Scholar
- 39.Los Arcos A, Yanci J, Mendiguchia J, et al. Short-term training effects of vertically and horizontally oriented exercises on neuromuscular performance in professional soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;9(3):480–8.Google Scholar
- 41.Cissik JM. Means and methods of speed training: part II. Strength Cond J. 2005;27(1):18–25.Google Scholar
- 43.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Research methods and reporting-preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Br Med J. 2009;338(7716):332.Google Scholar
- 44.Cohen J. Statistical analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.Google Scholar
- 45.Thalheimer W, Cook S. How to calculate effect sizes from published research: a simplified methodology. http://work-learning.com/effect_sizes.htm. Retrieved 2 Jan 2015.
- 47.Hopkins WG. Linear models and effect magnitudes for research, clinical and practical applications. Sportscience. 2010;14:49–58.Google Scholar
- 53.Makaruk B, Sozanski H, Makaruk H, et al. The effects of resisted sprint training on speed performance in women. Hum Mov. 2013;14(2):116–22.Google Scholar
- 57.Mackala K. Optimisation of performance through kinematic analysis of the different phases of the 100 metres. New Stud Athl. 2007;22(2):7.Google Scholar
- 64.Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, et al. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1(1). doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000006.pub3.
- 69.Mann R, Herman J. Kinematic analysis of Olympic sprint performance: men’s 200 meters. Int J Sports Biomech. 1985;1(15):151–62.Google Scholar
- 71.Young W. Laboratory strength assessment of athletes. New Stud Athl. 1995;10:89–96.Google Scholar
- 77.Smith CE, Hannon JC, McGladrey B, et al. The effects of a postactivation potentiation warm-up on subsequent sprint performance. Hum Mov. 2014;15(1):36–44.Google Scholar