Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Factors Modulating Post-Activation Potentiation of Jump, Sprint, Throw, and Upper-Body Ballistic Performances: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background

Although post-activation potentiation (PAP) has been extensively examined following the completion of a conditioning activity (CA), the precise effects on subsequent jump, sprint, throw, and upper-body ballistic performances and the factors modulating these effects have yet to be determined. Moreover, weaker and stronger individuals seem to exhibit different PAP responses; however, how they respond to the different components of a strength–power–potentiation complex remains to be elucidated.

Objectives

This meta-analysis determined (1) the effect of performing a CA on subsequent jump, sprint, throw, and upper-body ballistic performances; (2) the influence of different types of CA, squat depths during the CA, rest intervals, volumes of CA, and loads during the CA on PAP; and (3) how individuals of different strength levels respond to these various strength–power–potentiation complex components.

Methods

A computerized search was conducted in ADONIS, ERIC, SPORTDiscus, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases up to March 2015. The analysis comprised 47 studies and 135 groups of participants for a total of 1954 participants.

Results

The PAP effect is small for jump (effect size [ES] = 0.29), throw (ES = 0.26), and upper-body ballistic (ES = 0.23) performance activities, and moderate for sprint (ES = 0.51) performance activity. A larger PAP effect is observed among stronger individuals and those with more experience in resistance training. Plyometric (ES = 0.47) CAs induce a slightly larger PAP effect than traditional high-intensity (ES = 0.41), traditional moderate-intensity (ES = 0.19), and maximal isometric (ES = –0.09) CAs, and a greater effect after shallower (ES = 0.58) versus deeper (ES = 0.25) squat CAs, longer (ES = 0.44 and 0.49) versus shorter (ES = 0.17) recovery intervals, multiple- (ES = 0.69) versus single- (ES = 0.24) set CAs, and repetition maximum (RM) (ES = 0.51) versus sub-maximal (ES = 0.34) loads during the CA. It is noteworthy that a greater PAP effect can be realized earlier after a plyometric CA than with traditional high- and moderate-intensity CAs. Additionally, shorter recovery intervals, single-set CAs, and RM CAs are more effective at inducing PAP in stronger individuals, while weaker individuals respond better to longer recovery intervals, multiple-set CAs, and sub-maximal CAs. Finally, both weaker and stronger individuals express greater PAP after shallower squat CAs.

Conclusions

Performing a CA elicits small PAP effects for jump, throw, and upper-body ballistic performance activities, and a moderate effect for sprint performance activity. The level of potentiation is dependent on the individual’s level of strength and resistance training experience, the type of CA, the depth of the squat when this exercise is employed to elicit PAP, the rest period between the CA and subsequent performance, the number of set(s) of the CA, and the type of load used during the CA. Finally, some components of the strength–power–potentiation complex modulate the PAP response of weaker and stronger individuals in a different way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Stone M, Sands W, Pierce K, et al. Power and power potentiation among strength-power athletes: preliminary study. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2008;3(1):55–67.

  2. 2.

    Tillin NA, Bishop D. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation and its effect on performance of subsequent explosive activities. Sports Med. 2009;39(2):147–66.

  3. 3.

    Hodgson M, Docherty D, Robbins D. Post-activation potentiation: underlying physiology and implications for motor performance. Sports Med. 2005;35(7):585–95.

  4. 4.

    Rassier D, Macintosh B. Coexistence of potentiation and fatigue in skeletal muscle. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2000;33(5):499–508.

  5. 5.

    Wilson JM, Duncan NM, Marin PJ, et al. Meta-analysis of post activation potentiation and power: effects of conditioning activity, volume, gender, rest periods, and training status. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(3):854–9.

  6. 6.

    Esformes JI, Bampouras TM. Effect of back squat depth on lower-body postactivation potentiation. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(11):2997–3000.

  7. 7.

    Tran QT, Docherty D, Behm D. The effects of varying time under tension and volume load on acute neuromuscular responses. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;98(4):402–10.

  8. 8.

    Crewther BT, Kilduff LP, Cook CJ, et al. The acute potentiating effects of back squats on athlete performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(12):3319–25.

  9. 9.

    Kilduff L, Bevan H, Kingsley M, et al. Postactivation potentiation in professional rugby players: optimal recovery. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(4):1134–8.

  10. 10.

    Baker D. Acute effect of alternating heavy and light resistances on power output during upper-body complex power training. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(3):493–7.

  11. 11.

    Brandenburg JP. The acute effects of prior dynamic resistance exercise using different loads on subsequent upper-body explosive performance in resistance-trained men. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(2):427–32.

  12. 12.

    Seitz LB, de Villarreal ES, Haff GG. The temporal profile of postactivation potentiation is related to strength level. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(3):706–15.

  13. 13.

    Seitz LB, Trajano GS, Haff GG. The back squat and the power clean: elicitation of different degrees of potentiation. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(4):643–9.

  14. 14.

    Ruben RM, Molinari MA, Bibbee CA, et al. The acute effects of an ascending squat protocol on performance during horizontal plyometric jumps. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(2):358–69.

  15. 15.

    Jo E, Judelson DA, Brown LE, et al. Influence of recovery duration after a potentiating stimulus on muscular power in recreationally trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(2):343–7.

  16. 16.

    Chiu LZ, Barnes JL. The fitness-fatigue model revisited: Implications for planning short-and long-term training. Strength Cond J. 2003;25(6):42–51.

  17. 17.

    Hamada T, Sale DG, Macdougall JD. Postactivation potentiation in endurance-trained male athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(2):403–11.

  18. 18.

    Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press; 1985.

  19. 19.

    Thomas JR, French KE. The use of meta-analysis in exercise and sport: a tutorial. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1986;57(3):196–204.

  20. 20.

    Morris SB. Estimating effect sizes from the pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organ Res Methods. 2007;11(2):364–86.

  21. 21.

    Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155.

  22. 22.

    Pearson SJ, Hussain SR. Lack of association between postactivation potentiation and subsequent jump performance. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(5):418–25.

  23. 23.

    Kilduff LP, Cunningham DJ, Owen NJ, et al. Effect of postactivation potentiation on swimming starts in international sprint swimmers. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(9):2418–23.

  24. 24.

    Smith CE, Hannon JC, McGladrey B, et al. The effects of a postactivation potentiation warm-up on subsequent sprint performance. Hum Mov. 2014;15(1):33–41.

  25. 25.

    Judge LW, Bellar D, Glickman EL. Efficacy of potentiation of shot put performance through pre-activity heavy medicine ball throws. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:1.

  26. 26.

    Terzis G, Spengos K, Karampatsos G, et al. Acute effect of drop jumping on throwing performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(9):2592–7.

  27. 27.

    Esformes JI, Keenan M, Moody J, et al. Effect of different types of conditioning contraction on upper body postactivation potentiation. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(1):143–8.

  28. 28.

    Maughan R, Watson JS, Weir J. Relationships between muscle strength and muscle cross-sectional area in male sprinters and endurance runners. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1983;50(3):309–18.

  29. 29.

    Aagaard P, Andersen JL. Correlation between contractile strength and myosin heavy chain isoform composition in human skeletal muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(8):1217–22.

  30. 30.

    Moore RL, Stull JT. Myosin light chain phosphorylation in fast and slow skeletal muscles in situ. Am J Physiol. 1984;247(5):C462–71.

  31. 31.

    Grange RW, Vandenboom R, Houston ME. Physiological significance of myosin phosphorylation in skeletal muscle. Can J Appl Physiol. 1993;18(3):229–42.

  32. 32.

    de Villarreal ESS, González-Badillo JJ, Izquierdo M. Optimal warm-up stimuli of muscle activation to enhance short and long-term acute jumping performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;100(4):393–401.

  33. 33.

    Desmedt J, Godaux E. Ballistic contractions in man: characteristic recruitment pattern of single motor units of the tibialis anterior muscle. J Physiol. 1977;264(3):673–93.

  34. 34.

    Gullich A, Schmidtbleicher D. MVC-induced short-term potentiation of explosive force. New Stud Athlet. 1996;11(4):67–81.

  35. 35.

    West DJ, Cunningham DJ, Crewther BT, et al. Influence of ballistic bench press on upper body power output in professional rugby players. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(8):2282–7.

  36. 36.

    Fukutani A, Takei S, Hirata K, et al. Influence of the intensity of squat exercises on the subsequent jump performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(8):2236–43.

  37. 37.

    Henneman E, Olson CB. Relations between structure and function in the design of skeletal muscles. J Neurophysiol. 1965;28(3):581–98.

  38. 38.

    Tobin DP, Delahunt E. The acute effect of a plyometric stimulus on jump performance in professional rugby players. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(2):367–72.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Both authors contributed to the conception and design of the study, and writing of the manuscript. Both authors contributed to the development of the search strategy analysis and to the acquisition of data. Laurent B. Seitz contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. Both authors contributed to drafting the article or revising it critically. Both authors approved the final version to be submitted.

Author information

Correspondence to Laurent B. Seitz.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflict of interest

Laurent B. Seitz and G. Gregory Haff declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seitz, L.B., Haff, G.G. Factors Modulating Post-Activation Potentiation of Jump, Sprint, Throw, and Upper-Body Ballistic Performances: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Sports Med 46, 231–240 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0415-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bench Press
  • Repetition Maximum
  • Conditioning Activity
  • Weak Individual
  • Strong Individual