Which Extrinsic and Intrinsic Factors are Associated with Non-Contact Injuries in Adult Cricket Fast Bowlers?
- 1.1k Downloads
The high prevalence of injury amongst cricket fast bowlers exposes a great need for research into the risk factors associated with injury. Both extrinsic (environment-related) and intrinsic (person-related) risk factors are likely to be implicated within the high prevalence of non-contact injury amongst fast bowlers in cricket. Identifying and defining the relative importance of these risk factors is necessary in order to optimize injury prevention efforts.
The objective of this review was to assess and summarize the scientific literature related to the extrinsic and intrinsic factors associated with non-contact injury inherent to adult cricket fast bowlers.
A systematic review was performed in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines. This review considered both experimental and epidemiological study designs. Studies that included male cricket fast bowlers aged 18 years or above, from all levels of play, evaluating the association between extrinsic/intrinsic factors and injury in fast bowlers were considered for inclusion. The three-step search strategy aimed at finding both published and unpublished studies from all languages. The searched databases included MEDLINE via PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register in the Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), ProQuest 5000 International, ProQuest Health and Medical Complete, EBSCO MegaFile Premier, Science Direct, SPORTDiscus with Full Text and SCOPUS (prior to 28 April 2015). Initial keywords used were ‘cricket’, ‘pace’, ‘fast’, ‘bowler’, and ‘injury’. Papers which fitted the inclusion criteria were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI).
A total of 16 studies were determined to be suitable for inclusion in this systematic review. The mean critical appraisal score of the papers included in this study was 6.88 (SD 1.15) out of a maximum of 9. The following factors were found to be associated with injury: bowling shoulder internal rotation strength deficit, compromised dynamic balance and lumbar proprioception (joint position sense), the appearance of lumbar posterior element bone stress, degeneration of the lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and previous injury. Conflicting results were found for the association of quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle asymmetry with injury. Technique-related factors associated with injury included shoulder–pelvis flexion–extension angle, shoulder counter-rotation, knee angle, and the proportion of side-flexion during bowling. Bowling workload was the only extrinsic factor associated with injury in adult cricket fast bowlers. A high bowling workload (particularly if it represented a sudden upgrade from a lower workload) increased the subsequent risk to sustaining an injury 1, 3 or 4 weeks later.
Identifying the factors associated with injury is a crucial step which should precede the development of, and research into, the effectiveness of injury prevention programs. Once identified, risk factors may be included in pre-participation screening tools and injury prevention programs, and may also be incorporated in future research projects. Overall, the current review highlights the clear lack of research on factors associated with non-contact injury, specifically in adult cricket fast bowlers.
Systematic review registration number Johanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports 1387 (Olivier et al., JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep 13(1):3–13. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1387, 2015).
KeywordsIntrinsic Factor Knee Angle Joint Position Sense Previous Injury Injury Prevention Program
The authors would like to acknowledge the University of the Witwatersrand’s Research Committee who granted funding for this project as part of the Friedel Sellschop Award.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The University of the Witwatersrand’s Research Committee granted funding through the Friedel Sellschop Award which was partly used to fund this review.
Conflict of interest
Benita Olivier, Tracy Taljaard, Elaine Burger, Peter Brukner, John Orchard, Janine Gray, Nadine Botha, Aimee Stewart and Warrick McKinon declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.
This manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data and therefore ethical clearance was not applied for.
- 2.Orchard J, James T, Alcott E, et al. Injuries in Australian cricket at first class level 1995/1996 to 2000/2001. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(4):270–4 (discussion 5).Google Scholar
- 4.Frost WL, Chalmers DJ. Injury in elite New Zealand cricketers 2002–2008: descriptive epidemiology. Br J Sports Med. 2012;1–6. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091337.
- 14.Morton S, Barton CJ, Rice S, et al. Risk factors and successful interventions for cricket-related low back pain: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2013;1–8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091782.
- 22.Orchard JW, Blanch P, Paoloni J, et al. Cricket fast bowling workload patterns as risk factors for tendon, muscle, bone and joint injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2015;1–6. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093683.
- 23.Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual. 2014th ed. Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute, The University of Adelaide; 2014.Google Scholar
- 25.Ranson C, Burnett A, King M, et al. Acute lumbar stress injury, trunk kinematics, lumbar MRI and paraspinal muscle morphology in fast bowlers in cricket. In: International society of biomechanics in sports conference, Seoul; 2008.Google Scholar
- 28.Aginsky KD, Lategan L, Stretch RA. Shoulder injuries in provincial male fast bowlers -predisposing factors. SAJSM. 2004;16(1):25–8.Google Scholar
- 32.Olivier B, Stewart AV, McKinon W. Cricket pace bowlers: the role of spinal and knee kinematics in low back and lower limb injury. 2014 (unpublished).Google Scholar
- 36.Kountouris A, Portus M, Cook J. Cricket fast bowlers without low-back pain have larger quadratus lumborum asymmetry than injured bowlers. Clin J Sport Med. 2013;1–5. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318280ac88.
- 39.Hunter SK, Critchlow A, Shin IS, et al. Fatigability of the elbow flexor muscles for a sustained submaximal contraction is similar in men and women matched for strength. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004;96(1):195–202. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00893.2003.
- 45.Cholewicki J, Silfies SP, Shah RA, et al. Delayed trunk muscle reflex responses increase the risk of low back injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(23):2614–20.Google Scholar
- 46.O’Sullivan PB, Burnett A, Floyd AN, et al. Lumbar repositioning deficit in a specific low back pain population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(10):1074–9. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000061990.56113.6F.
- 53.Loram LC, McKinon W, Wormgoor S, et al. Determinants of ball release speed in schoolboy fast-medium bowlers in cricket. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2005;45(4):483–90.Google Scholar