Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 45, Issue 10, pp 1443–1454 | Cite as

Validity and Reliability of Field-Based Measures for Assessing Movement Skill Competency in Lifelong Physical Activities: A Systematic Review

  • Ryan M. Hulteen
  • Natalie J. Lander
  • Philip J. Morgan
  • Lisa M. Barnett
  • Samuel J. Robertson
  • David R. Lubans
Systematic Review

Abstract

Background

It has been suggested that young people should develop competence in a variety of ‘lifelong physical activities’ to ensure that they can be active across the lifespan.

Objective

The primary aim of this systematic review is to report the methodological properties, validity, reliability, and test duration of field-based measures that assess movement skill competency in lifelong physical activities. A secondary aim was to clearly define those characteristics unique to lifelong physical activities.

Data Sources

A search of four electronic databases (Scopus, SPORTDiscus, ProQuest, and PubMed) was conducted between June 2014 and April 2015 with no date restrictions.

Study Selection

Studies addressing the validity and/or reliability of lifelong physical activity tests were reviewed. Included articles were required to assess lifelong physical activities using process-oriented measures, as well as report either one type of validity or reliability.

Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods

Assessment criteria for methodological quality were adapted from a checklist used in a previous review of sport skill outcome assessments.

Results

Movement skill assessments for eight different lifelong physical activities (badminton, cycling, dance, golf, racquetball, resistance training, swimming, and tennis) in 17 studies were identified for inclusion. Methodological quality, validity, reliability, and test duration (time to assess a single participant), for each article were assessed. Moderate to excellent reliability results were found in 16 of 17 studies, with 71 % reporting inter-rater reliability and 41 % reporting intra-rater reliability. Only four studies in this review reported test–retest reliability. Ten studies reported validity results; content validity was cited in 41 % of these studies. Construct validity was reported in 24 % of studies, while criterion validity was only reported in 12 % of studies.

Limitations

Numerous assessments for lifelong physical activities may exist, yet only assessments for eight lifelong physical activities were included in this review. Generalizability of results may be more applicable if more heterogeneous samples are used in future research.

Conclusion

Moderate to excellent levels of inter- and intra-rater reliability were reported in the majority of studies. However, future work should look to establish test–retest reliability. Validity was less commonly reported than reliability, and further types of validity other than content validity need to be established in future research. Specifically, predictive validity of ‘lifelong physical activity’ movement skill competency is needed to support the assertion that such activities provide the foundation for a lifetime of activity.

Keywords

Resistance Training Content Validity Test Duration Movement Skill Fundamental Movement Skill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors report no conflicts of interest within the information provided in this review. No funding was received by any of the authors to perform any portion of the review. Authorship criteria was met by all authors for this journal, and each author made a significant contribution to the final version of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Lloyd RS, Faigenbaum AD, Stone MH, et al. Position statement on youth resistance training: the 2014 international consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:498–505. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092952.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stodden DF, Langendorfer SJ, Roberton MA. The association between motor skill competence and physical fitness in young adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009;80(2):223–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stodden DF, True LK, Langendorfer SJ, et al. Associations among selected motor skills and health-related fitness: indirect evidence for Seefeldt’s proficiency barrier in young adults? Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84(3):397–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnett LM, van Beurden E, Morgan PJ, et al. Childhood motor skill proficiency as a predictor of adolescent physical activity. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44(3):252–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gallahue DL, Ozmun JC, Goodway J. Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents, adults. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2012.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morgan PJ, Barnett LM, Cliff DP, et al. Fundamental movement skill interventions in youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;132(5):e1361–83. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark JE, Metcalfe JS. The mountain of motor development: a metaphor. In: Clarke JE, Humphrey JH, editors. Motor development: research and reviews, vol. 2. Reston: National Association for Sport and Physical Education; 2002. p. 163–90.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burton AW, Miller DE, Miller D. Movement skill assessment. Champaign: Human Kinetics Champaign; 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hardy LL, Reinten-Reynolds T, Espinel P, et al. Prevalence and correlates of low fundamental movement skill competency in children. Pediatrics. 2012;130(2):e390–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodway JD, Robinson LE, Crowe H. Gender differences in fundamental motor skill development in disadvantaged preschoolers from two geographical regions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010;81(1):17–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seefeldt V. The concepts of readiness applied to motor skill acquisition. In: Magill RA, Ash MJ, Smoll FL, editors. Children in sport. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1982. p. 31–7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ, et al. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr. 2005;146(6):732–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coalter F. Sport and recreation in the United Kingdom: flow with the flow or buck the trends? Manag Leis. 1999;4(1):24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fairclough S, Stratton G, Baldwin G. The contribution of secondary school physical education to lifetime physical activity. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2002;8(1):69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Green K. Mission impossible? Reflecting upon the relationship between physical education, youth sport and lifelong participation. Sport Educ Soc. 2014;19(4):357–75. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.683781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Green K. Lifelong participation, physical education and the work of Ken Roberts. Sport Educ Soc. 2002;7(2):167–82. doi: 10.1080/1357332022000018850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stodden DF, Goodway JD, Langendorfer SJ, et al. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: an emergent relationship. Quest. 2008;60(2):290–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kirk D. Physical education, youth sport and lifelong participation: the importance of early learning experiences. Eur Phys Educ Review. 2005;11(3):239–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Comprehensive school physical activity programs: a guide for schools. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2013.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, et al. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(1):181–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dunn AL, Ross AE, Jakicic JM. Lifestyle physical activity interventions: history, short- and long-term effects, and recommendations. Am J Sport Med. 1998;15(4):398–412.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Penney D, Jess M. Physical education and physically active lives: a lifelong approach to curriculum development. Sport Educ Soc. 2004;9(2):269–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ross JG, Dotson CO, Gilbert GG, et al. What are kids doing in school physical education? J Phys Educ Recreat Dance. 1985;56(1):73–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pangrazi R. Dynamic physical education for elementary school children. 15th ed. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings; 2007.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Loes M. Epidemiology of sports injuries in the Swiss organization. Int J Sports Med. 1995;16(2):134–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    De Loes M, Goldie I. Incidence rate of injuries during sport activity and physical exercise in a rural Swedish municipality: incidence rates in 17 sports. Int J Sports Med. 1988;9(6):461–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nicholl J, Coleman P, Williams B. The epidemiology of sports and exercise related injury in the United Kingdom. Br J Sports Med. 1995;29(4):232–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics. Participation in sport and physical recreation, Australia, 2011–2012. 2013. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/4177.0~2011-12~+Features~Characteristics+of+participation?OpenDocument. Accessed 12 Nov 2014.
  29. 29.
    Hands BP. How can we best measure fundamental movement skills? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Health, Physical Education and Recreation Inc. (ACHPER). In: 23rd biennial national/international conference: interactive health and physical education. 2002. Launceston, TAS.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nicholls R, Fleisig G, Elliott B, et al. Baseball: accuracy of qualitative analysis for assessment of skilled baseball pitching technique. Sports Biomech. 2003;2(2):213–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cools W, De Martelaer K, Samaey C, et al. Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: a review of seven movement skill assessment tools. J Sports Sci Med. 2009;8(2):154.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Robertson SJ, Burnett AF, Cochrane J. Tests examining skill outcomes in sport: a systematic review of measurement properties and feasibility. Sports Med. 2014;44(4):501–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hardy LL, King L, Farrell L, et al. Fundamental movement skills among Australian preschool children. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(5):503–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pang AW-Y, Fong DT-P. Fundamental motor skill proficiency of Hong Kong children aged 6–9 years. Res Sports Med. 2009;17(3):125–44.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Spessato BC, Gabbard C, Valentini N, et al. Gender differences in Brazilian children’s fundamental movement skill performance. Early Child Devel Care. 2013;183(7):916–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ulrich DA. Test of gross motor development. 2nd ed. Austin: PRO-ED, Inc.; 2000.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sireci SG. The construct of content validity. Soc Indic Res. 1998;45(1/3):83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barrow HM, McGee R, Tritschler KA. Practical measurement in physical education and sport. 4th ed. Philidelphia: Lea &Febiger; 1989.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Helmerhorst HJ, Brage S, Warren J, et al. A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):103–57.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Myer GD, Kushner AM, Brent JL, et al. The back squat: a proposed assessment of functional deficits and technical factors that limit performance. Strength Cond J. 2014;36(6):4–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lam ET, Zhang JJ. The development and validation of a racquetball skills test battery for young adult beginners. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2002;6(2):95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Krasnow D, Chatfield SJ. Development of the “performance competence evaluation measure”: assessing qualitative aspects of dance performance. J Dance Med Sci. 2009;13(4):101–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lubans DR, Smith JJ, Harries SK, et al. Development, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the resistance training skills battery. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(5):1373–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ducheyne F, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Lenoir M, et al. Children’s cycling skills: development of a test and determination of individual and environmental correlates. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;50:688–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chatfield SJ. A test for evaluating proficiency in dance. J Dance Med Sci. 2009;13(4):108–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Barnett LM, Hardy LL, Brian A, et al. The development and validation of a golf swing and putt skill assessment for children. J Sports Sci Med. 2015;14(1):147–54.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Toriola AL, Toriola OM, Dhaliwal HS, et al. Relationship between physical education students’ achievements in a french badminton service test and expert ratings of technique quality. Percept Mot Skills. 2004;98(2):406–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Angioi M, Metsios GS, Twitchett E, et al. Association between selected physical fitness parameters and aesthetic competence in contemporary dancers. J Dance Med Sci. 2009;13(4):115–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Buszard T, Farrow D, Reid M, et al. Modifying equipment in early skill development: a tennis perspective. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2014;85(2):218–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Macarthur C, Parkin PC, Sidky M, et al. Evaluation of a bicycle skills training program for young children: a randomized controlled trial. Injury Prevention. 1998;4(2):116–21.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Messick JA. Prelongitudinal screening of hypothesized developmental sequences for the overhead tennis serve in experienced tennis players 9-19 years of age. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1991;62(3):249–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wang J, Liu W, Moffit J. Steps for arm and trunk actions of overhead forehand stroke used in badminton games across skill levels. Percept Mot Skills. 2009;109(1):177–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zetou E, Nikolaos V, Evaggelos B. The effect of instructional self-talk on performance and learning the backstroke of young swimmers and on the perceived functions of it. J Phys Educ Sport. 2014;14(1):27–35.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Erbaugh SJ. Assessment of swimming performance of preschool children. Percept Mot Skills. 1978;46(3 Pt 2):1179–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Farrow D, Reid M. The effect of equipment scaling on the skill acquisition of beginning tennis players. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(7):723–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lubans DR, Morgan P, Callister R, et al. Test–retest reliability of a battery of field-based health-related fitness measures for adolescents. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(7):685–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Barnett L, Reynolds J, Faigenbaum AD, et al. Rater agreement of a test battery designed to assess adolescents’ resistance training skill competency. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(1):72–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.11.01253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Smith JJ, Morgan PJ, Plotnikoff RC, et al. Smart-phone obesity prevention trial for adolescent boys in low-income communities: the ATLAS RCT. Pediatrics. 2014;134(3):e723–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Dumith SC, Gigante DP, Domingues MR, et al. Physical activity change during adolescence: a systematic review and a pooled analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(3):685–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hills AP, Dengel DR, Lubans DR. Supporting public health priorities: recommendations for physical education and physical activity promotion in schools. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;57(4):368–74. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.09.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Comprehensive school physical activity programs: a guide for schools. 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/physicalactivity/cspap.htm. Accessed 10 Nov 2014.
  64. 64.
    Logan SW, Robinson LE, Wilson AE, et al. Getting the fundamentals of movement: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38(3):305–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Streiner DL. 22 A checklist for evaluating the usefulness of rating scales. A guide for the statistically perplexed: selected readings for clinical researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2013. pp. 267–288.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Morgan PJ, Hansen V. Classroom teachers’ perceptions of the impact of barriers to teaching physical education on the quality of physical education programs. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008;79(4):506–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bryant ES, Duncan MJ, Birch SL. Fundamental movement skills and weight status in British primary school children. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(7):730–6. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2013.870232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hardy LL, Barnett L, Espinel P, et al. Thirteen-year trends in child and adolescent fundamental movement skills: 1997–2010. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(10):1965–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan M. Hulteen
    • 1
  • Natalie J. Lander
    • 2
  • Philip J. Morgan
    • 1
  • Lisa M. Barnett
    • 2
  • Samuel J. Robertson
    • 3
  • David R. Lubans
    • 1
  1. 1.Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and NutritionUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  2. 2.School of Health and Social DevelopmentDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia
  3. 3.Institute for Sport, Exercise and Active LivingVictoria UniversityFootscrayAustralia

Personalised recommendations