Active Workstations to Fight Sedentary Behaviour
- 3k Downloads
The impact of active workstations has been studied in several settings, and several outcomes have been investigated. However, the effects on health, work performance, quality of life, etc., have never been systematically reviewed.
To evaluate the existing literature about active workstations and their possible positive health and work performance effects.
We searched the electronic databases PubMed and Web of Science (up until 28 February 2014). The search terms we used were ‘active workstation’, ‘standing workstation’, ‘standing desk’, ‘stand up workstation’, ‘stand up desk’, ‘walking desk’, ‘walking workstation’, ‘treadmill workstation’, ‘treadmill desk’, ‘cycling workstation’, ‘cycling desk’ and ‘bike desk’, in combination with ‘health’, ‘quality of life’, ‘cognition’, ‘computer task performance’, ‘absenteeism’, ‘productivity’, ‘academic achievement’, ‘cognitive decline’, and ‘independent living’. In addition, we searched the reference lists of relevant published articles.
Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials and non-randomized non-controlled trials investigating the introduction of active workstations in humans were included in this systematic review. Only original studies were included, and we did not accept studies combining the introduction of active workstations with other interventions. Outcomes concerning health, energy expenditure, cognition, quality of life and work performance were included.
We included 32 studies, of which five were longitudinal studies in school-aged children, 10 were longitudinal studies in adults and 17 were non-longitudinal studies in adults. Sixteen studies investigated standing desks, 15 investigated walking desks, and one investigated a cycling workstation. The general findings were decreased sitting time, increased energy expenditure, a positive effect on several health markers, no detrimental effect on work performance, no acute effect on cognitive function and no straightforward findings concerning computer task performance.
The implementation of active workstations might contribute to improving people’s health and physical activity levels. The effect of the use of these active workstations on cognition and applied work tasks, such as computer task performance, needs further investigation before conclusions can be drawn. Another aspect that needs further investigation is the implementation of the different active workstations in all age groups.
KeywordsPhysical Activity Sedentary Behaviour Physical Activity Level Work Performance Increase Energy Expenditure
No sources of funding were used in the preparation of this review. The authors have no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.
- 1.World Health Organisation. Health topics: physical activity; 2014. http://www.who.int/topics/physical_activity/en/. Accessed 21 Feb 2014.
- 2.National Institutes of Health. What is physical activity? 2011. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/phys/. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
- 4.World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2010 contract no.: ISBN 978 92 4 159 997 9.Google Scholar
- 12.World Health Organization. Prevalence of insufficient physical activity; 2008. http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/physical_activity/en/. Accessed 17 Oct 2013.
- 18.Eurobarometer. Sport and physical activity; 2010.Google Scholar
- 19.British Heart Foundation. Physical activity statistics 2012. Factors influencing physical activity, chap. 6; 2012.Google Scholar
- 22.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7).Google Scholar
- 23.Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Critical appraisal: notes and checklists. http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/checklists.html. Accessed 23 Sept 2013.
- 24.Effective Public Health Practice Project. Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies; 2010. http://www.ephpp.ca/PDF/Quality%20Assessment%20Tool_2010_2.pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2013.
- 27.Burford EM, Botter J, Commissaris D. The effect of dynamic workstations on the performance of various computer and office-based tasks. In: Duffy VG, editor. Digital human modeling and applications in health, safety, ergonomics, and risk management. Human Body Modeling and Ergonomics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8026. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 205–12.Google Scholar
- 31.Lytle TL, Wenos DL, Ritttenhouse MA. The effects of the walking workstation on work productivity and selected physiological variables; 2011.Google Scholar
- 39.Botter J, Burford EM, Commissaris D. The biomechanical and physiological effect of two dynamic workstations. In: Duffy VG, editor. Digital human modeling and applications in health, safety, ergonomics, and risk management. Human body modeling and ergonomics. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Thompson WG, Koepp GA, Levine JA. Increasing physician activity with treadmill desks. Work. 2013 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
- 44.Thompson WG, Foster RC, Eide DS et al. Feasibility of a walking workstation to increase daily walking. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(3):225–8 (discussion 228). doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.039479.
- 53.Alderman BL, Olson RL, Mattina DM. Cognitive function during low intensity walking: a test of the treadmill workstation. J Phys Act Health. 2013.Google Scholar