Sports Medicine

, Volume 44, Issue 9, pp 1261–1273 | Cite as

Active Workstations to Fight Sedentary Behaviour

  • Tine Torbeyns
  • Stephen Bailey
  • Inge Bos
  • Romain Meeusen
Systematic Review



The impact of active workstations has been studied in several settings, and several outcomes have been investigated. However, the effects on health, work performance, quality of life, etc., have never been systematically reviewed.


To evaluate the existing literature about active workstations and their possible positive health and work performance effects.

Data Sources

We searched the electronic databases PubMed and Web of Science (up until 28 February 2014). The search terms we used were ‘active workstation’, ‘standing workstation’, ‘standing desk’, ‘stand up workstation’, ‘stand up desk’, ‘walking desk’, ‘walking workstation’, ‘treadmill workstation’, ‘treadmill desk’, ‘cycling workstation’, ‘cycling desk’ and ‘bike desk’, in combination with ‘health’, ‘quality of life’, ‘cognition’, ‘computer task performance’, ‘absenteeism’, ‘productivity’, ‘academic achievement’, ‘cognitive decline’, and ‘independent living’. In addition, we searched the reference lists of relevant published articles.

Study Selection

Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials and non-randomized non-controlled trials investigating the introduction of active workstations in humans were included in this systematic review. Only original studies were included, and we did not accept studies combining the introduction of active workstations with other interventions. Outcomes concerning health, energy expenditure, cognition, quality of life and work performance were included.


We included 32 studies, of which five were longitudinal studies in school-aged children, 10 were longitudinal studies in adults and 17 were non-longitudinal studies in adults. Sixteen studies investigated standing desks, 15 investigated walking desks, and one investigated a cycling workstation. The general findings were decreased sitting time, increased energy expenditure, a positive effect on several health markers, no detrimental effect on work performance, no acute effect on cognitive function and no straightforward findings concerning computer task performance.


The implementation of active workstations might contribute to improving people’s health and physical activity levels. The effect of the use of these active workstations on cognition and applied work tasks, such as computer task performance, needs further investigation before conclusions can be drawn. Another aspect that needs further investigation is the implementation of the different active workstations in all age groups.


Physical Activity Sedentary Behaviour Physical Activity Level Work Performance Increase Energy Expenditure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



No sources of funding were used in the preparation of this review. The authors have no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.


  1. 1.
    World Health Organisation. Health topics: physical activity; 2014. Accessed 21 Feb 2014.
  2. 2.
    National Institutes of Health. What is physical activity? 2011. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
  3. 3.
    Dishman RK, Berthoud H, Booth FW. Neurobiology of exercise. Obesity. 2006;14(3):345–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2010 contract no.: ISBN 978 92 4 159 997 9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pedersen SJ, Cooley PD, Mainsbridge C. An e-health intervention designed to increase workday energy expenditure by reducing prolonged occupational sitting habits. Work. 2013;. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131644.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Praag H. Neurogenesis and exercise: past and future directions. Neuromol Med. 2008;10(2):128–40. doi: 10.1007/s12017-008-8028-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Donnelly JE, Lambourne K. Classroom-based physical activity, cognition, and academic achievement. Prev Med. 2011;52(Suppl 1):S36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.021.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van den Heuvel SG, Boshuizen HC, Hildebrandt VH, et al. Effect of sporting activity on absenteeism in a working population. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(3):e15. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013052.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown HE, Gilson ND, Burton NW. Does physical activity impact on presenteeism and other indicators of workplace well-being? Sports Med. 2011;41(3):249–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laurin D, Verreault R, Lindsay J, et al. Physical activity and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in elderly persons. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:498–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tak E, Kuiper R, Chorus A, et al. Prevention of onset and progression of basic ADL disability by physical activity in community dwelling older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12(1):329–38. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2012.10.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    World Health Organization. Prevalence of insufficient physical activity; 2008. Accessed 17 Oct 2013.
  13. 13.
    Cadilhac DA, Cumming TB, Sheppard L, et al. The economic benefits of reducing physical inactivity: an Australian example. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:99. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-99.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Allender S, Foster C, Scarborough P, et al. The burden of physical activity-related ill health in the UK. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(4):344–8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.050807.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sedentary Behaviour Research Network. Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37:540–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marshall SJ, Ramirez E. Reducing sedentary behavior: a new paradigm in physical activity promotion. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2011;5(6):518–30. doi: 10.1177/1559827610395487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plotnikoff R, Karunamuni N. Reducing sitting time: the new workplace health priority. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2012;67(3):125–7. doi: 10.1080/19338244.2012.697407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eurobarometer. Sport and physical activity; 2010.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    British Heart Foundation. Physical activity statistics 2012. Factors influencing physical activity, chap. 6; 2012.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oja P, Bull FC, Fogelholm M, et al. Physical activity recommendations for health: what should Europe do? BMC Public Health. 2010;10:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-10.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    de Geus B, Van Hoof E, Aerts I, et al. Cycling to work: influence on indexes of health in untrained men and women in Flanders. Coronary heart disease and quality of life. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008;18(4):498–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Critical appraisal: notes and checklists. Accessed 23 Sept 2013.
  24. 24.
    Effective Public Health Practice Project. Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies; 2010. Accessed 8 Oct 2013.
  25. 25.
    Straker L, Abbott RA, Heiden M, et al. Sit-stand desks in call centres: associations of use and ergonomics awareness with sedentary behavior. Appl Ergon. 2013;44(4):517–22. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.11.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wilks S, Mortimer M, Nylen P. The introduction of sit-stand worktables; aspects of attitudes, compliance and satisfaction. Appl Ergon. 2006;37(3):359–65. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burford EM, Botter J, Commissaris D. The effect of dynamic workstations on the performance of various computer and office-based tasks. In: Duffy VG, editor. Digital human modeling and applications in health, safety, ergonomics, and risk management. Human Body Modeling and Ergonomics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8026. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 205–12.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dunstan DW, Wiesner G, Eakin EG, et al. Reducing office workers’ sitting time: rationale and study design for the Stand Up Victoria cluster randomized trial. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1057.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cardon G, De Clercq D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Sitting habits in elementary schoolchildren: a traditional versus a “Moving school”. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;54(2):133–42. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00215-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robertson MM, Ciriello VM, Garabet AM. Office ergonomics training and a sit-stand workstation: effects on musculoskeletal and visual symptoms and performance of office workers. Appl Ergon. 2013;44(1):73–85. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.05.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lytle TL, Wenos DL, Ritttenhouse MA. The effects of the walking workstation on work productivity and selected physiological variables; 2011.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Benden ME, Blake JJ, Wendel ML. The impact of stand-biased desks in classrooms on calorie expenditure in children. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(8):1433–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Blake JJ, Benden ME, Wendel ML. Using stand/sit workstations in classrooms: lessons learned from a pilot study in Texas. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012;18(5):412–5. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182215048.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hinckson EA, Aminian S, Ikeda E, et al. Acceptability of standing workstations in elementary schools: a pilot study. Prev Med. 2013;56(1):82–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lanningham-Foster L, Foster RC, McCrady SK, et al. Changing the school environment to increase physical activity in children. Obesity. 2008;16(8):1849–53. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.282.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Koepp GA, Snedden BJ, Flynn L, et al. Feasibility analysis of standing desks for sixth graders. Infant Child Adolesc Nutr. 2012;4(2):89–92. doi: 10.1177/1941406412439414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    McAlpine DA, Manohar CU, McCrady SK. An office-place stepping device to promote workplace physical activity. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41:903–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Carr LJ, Walaska KA, Marcus BH. Feasibility of a portable pedal exercise machine for reducing sedentary time in the workplace. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(6):430–5. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.079574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Botter J, Burford EM, Commissaris D. The biomechanical and physiological effect of two dynamic workstations. In: Duffy VG, editor. Digital human modeling and applications in health, safety, ergonomics, and risk management. Human body modeling and ergonomics. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ben-Ner A, Paulson DF, Koepp GA. Treadmill workstations: the effects of walking while working on physical activity and work performance. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e88620.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Thompson WG, Koepp GA, Levine JA. Increasing physician activity with treadmill desks. Work. 2013 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Alkhajah TA, Reeves MM, Eakin EG, et al. Sit-stand workstations: a pilot intervention to reduce office sitting time. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):298–303. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pronk NP, Katz AS, Lowry M. Reducing occupational sitting time and improving worker health: the take-a-stand project, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:110323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thompson WG, Foster RC, Eide DS et al. Feasibility of a walking workstation to increase daily walking. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(3):225–8 (discussion 228). doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.039479.
  45. 45.
    Gilson ND, Suppini A, Ryde GC, et al. Does the use of standing ‘hot’ desks change sedentary work time in an open plan office? Prev Med. 2012;54(1):65–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.10.012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Grunseit AC, Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP. “Thinking on your feet”: a qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:365–75.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    John D, Thompson DL, Raynor H. Treadmill workstations: a worksite physical activity intervention in overweight and obese office workers. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(8):1034–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Koepp GA, Manohar CU, McCrady-Spitzer SK, et al. Treadmill desks: a 1-year prospective trial. Obesity. 2013;21(4):705–11. doi: 10.1002/oby.20121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chester MR, Rys MJ, Konz SA. Leg swelling, comfort and fatigue when sitting, standing and sit/standing. Int J Ind Ergon. 2002;29:289–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ebara T, Kubo T, Inoue T. Effects of adjustable sit-stand VDT workstations on workers’ musculoskeletal discomfort, alertness and performance. Ind Health. 2008;46:497–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hedge A, Jagdeo J, Agarwal A, et al. Sitting or standing for computer work—does a negative-tilt keyboard tray make a difference? Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2005;49(8):808–11. doi: 10.1177/154193120504900804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Reiff C, Marlatt K, Dengel DR. Difference in caloric expenditure in sitting versus standing desks. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9:1009–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Alderman BL, Olson RL, Mattina DM. Cognitive function during low intensity walking: a test of the treadmill workstation. J Phys Act Health. 2013.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cox RH, Guth J, Siekemeyer L. Metabolic cost and speech quality while using an active workstation. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(3):332–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Funk RE, Taylor ML, Creekmur CC. Effect of walking speed on typing performance using an active workstation. Percept Motor Skills. 2012;115(1):309–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    John D, Bassett DR, Thompson DL, et al. Effect of using a treadmill workstation on performance of simulated office work tasks. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(5):617–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ohlinger SA, Horn TS, Berg WP, et al. The effect of active workstation use on measures of cognition, attention, and motor skill. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(1):119–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Straker L, Levine J, Campbell A. The effects of walking and cycling computer workstations on keyboard and mouse performance. Hum Factors. 2009;51(6):44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Thompson WG, Levine JA. Productivity of transcriptionists using a treadmill desk. Work. 2011;40(4):473–7. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hasegawa T, Inoue K, Tsutsue O. Effects of a sit-stand schedule on a light repetitive task. Int J Ind Ergon. 2001;28:219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Buckley JP, Mellor DD, Morris M, et al. Standing-based office work shows encouraging signs of attenuating post-prandial glycaemic excursion. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(2):109–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Levine JA, Miller JM. The energy expenditure of using a “walk-and-work” desk for office workers with obesity. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41(9):558–61. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.032755.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Speck RM, Schmitz KH. Energy expenditure comparison: a pilot study of standing instead of sitting at work for obesity prevention. Prev Med. 2011;52(3–4):283–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.02.002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:58–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hillman CH, Kamijo K, Scudder M. A review of chronic and acute physical activity participation on neuroelectric measures of brain health and cognition during childhood. Prev Med. 2011;52:521–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tine Torbeyns
    • 1
  • Stephen Bailey
    • 2
  • Inge Bos
    • 1
  • Romain Meeusen
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Human Physiology and Sports MedicineVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Physical Therapy EducationElon UniversityElonUSA
  3. 3.School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation SciencesJames Cook University QueenslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations