Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 44, Issue 9, pp 1319–1320 | Cite as

The Psychobiological Model of Endurance Performance: An Effort-Based Decision-Making Theory to Explain Self-Paced Endurance Performance

  • Benjamin PageauxEmail author
Letter to the Editor

To the Editor,

In a recent review published in this journal [1], Renfree and colleagues demonstrated the importance of considering decision-making theories to understand self-paced endurance performance. The authors aimed to examine current models/theories of decision-making in an attempt to explain the manner in which regulation of muscular work (pacing) is achieved during self-paced endurance performance. As explained by the authors, it is crucial that models explaining self-paced endurance performance take into account both internal (e.g. perception of effort, physiological responses) and external (e.g. tactical decisions, presence of competitors) factors. Interestingly, among all models presented in their review, the authors omitted to present an effort-based decision-making model recently proposed to explain self-paced endurance performance: the psychobiological model (of endurance performance) [2]. The psychobiological model has been shown to provide a valid explanation of the...

Keywords

Endurance Performance Stroop Task Mental Fatigue Potential Motivation Corollary Discharge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Romuald Lepers and Samuele Marcora for our numerous discussions on this topic and their feedback on this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The author has no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this letter.

References

  1. 1.
    Renfree A, Martin L, Micklewright D, et al. Application of decision-making theory to the regulation of muscular work rate during self-paced competitive endurance activity. Sports Med. 2014;44(2):147–58. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0107-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marcora S. Counterpoint: afferent feedback from fatigued locomotor muscles is not an important determinant of endurance exercise performance. J Appl Physiol. 2010;108(2):454–6 (discussion 6–7). doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00976.2009a108/2/454.
  3. 3.
    Pageaux B, Marcora SM, Lepers R. Prolonged mental exertion does not alter neuromuscular function of the knee extensors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(12):2254–64. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31829b504a.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marcora SM, Staiano W, Manning V. Mental fatigue impairs physical performance in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106(3):857–64. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91324.2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marcora SM, Bosio A, de Morree HM. Locomotor muscle fatigue increases cardiorespiratory responses and reduces performance during intense cycling exercise independently from metabolic stress. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008;294(3):R874–83. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00678.2007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pageaux B, Lepers R, Dietz KC, et al. Response inhibition impairs subsequent self-paced endurance performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2838-5.
  7. 7.
    de Morree HM, Marcora SM. Effects of isolated locomotor muscle fatigue on pacing and time trial performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113(9):2371–80. doi: 10.1007/s00421-013-2673-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brehm JW, Self EA. The intensity of motivation. Annu Rev Psychol. 1989;40:109–31. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marcora SM. The end-spurt does not require a subconscious intelligent system, just our conscious brain. BJSM, BMJ Group Blogs [Internet]; 2008. http://blogs.bmj.com/bjsm/the-end-spurt-does-not-require-a-subconscious-intelligent-system/. Accessed 30 Apr 2014
  10. 10.
    Joseph T, Johnson B, Battista RA, et al. Perception of fatigue during simulated competition. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(2):381–6. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a83f6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Watson P, Hasegawa H, Roelands B, et al. Acute dopamine/noradrenaline reuptake inhibition enhances human exercise performance in warm, but not temperate conditions. J Physiol. 2005;565(Pt 3):873–83. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.079202.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marcora S. Perception of effort during exercise is independent of afferent feedback from skeletal muscles, heart, and lungs. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106(6):2060–2. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90378.2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Morree HM, Klein C, Marcora SM. Perception of effort reflects central motor command during movement execution. Psychophysiology. 2012;49:1242–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01399.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haggard P. Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(12):934–46. doi: 10.1038/nrn2497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Endurance Research Group, School of Sport and Exercise SciencesUniversity of Kent at MedwayKentUK

Personalised recommendations