Sports Medicine

, Volume 44, Issue 8, pp 1113–1124 | Cite as

High Responders and Low Responders: Factors Associated with Individual Variation in Response to Standardized Training

  • Theresa N. Mann
  • Robert P. Lamberts
  • Michael I. Lambert
Review Article


The response to an exercise intervention is often described in general terms, with the assumption that the group average represents a typical response for most individuals. In reality, however, it is more common for individuals to show a wide range of responses to an intervention rather than a similar response. This phenomenon of ‘high responders’ and ‘low responders’ following a standardized training intervention may provide helpful insights into mechanisms of training adaptation and methods of training prescription. Therefore, the aim of this review was to discuss factors associated with inter-individual variation in response to standardized, endurance-type training. It is well-known that genetic influences make an important contribution to individual variation in certain training responses. The association between genotype and training response has often been supported using heritability estimates; however, recent studies have been able to link variation in some training responses to specific single nucleotide polymorphisms. It would appear that hereditary influences are often expressed through hereditary influences on the pre-training phenotype, with some parameters showing a hereditary influence in the pre-training phenotype but not in the subsequent training response. In most cases, the pre-training phenotype appears to predict only a small amount of variation in the subsequent training response of that phenotype. However, the relationship between pre-training autonomic activity and subsequent maximal oxygen uptake response appears to show relatively stronger predictive potential. Individual variation in response to standardized training that cannot be explained by genetic influences may be related to the characteristics of the training program or lifestyle factors. Although standardized programs usually involve training prescribed by relative intensity and duration, some methods of relative exercise intensity prescription may be more successful in creating an equivalent homeostatic stress between individuals than other methods. Individual variation in the homeostatic stress associated with each training session would result in individuals experiencing a different exercise ‘stimulus’ and contribute to individual variation in the adaptive responses incurred over the course of the training program. Furthermore, recovery between the sessions of a standardized training program may vary amongst individuals due to factors such as training status, sleep, psychological stress, and habitual physical activity. If there is an imbalance between overall stress and recovery, some individuals may develop fatigue and even maladaptation, contributing to variation in pre–post training responses. There is some evidence that training response can be modulated by the timing and composition of dietary intake, and hence nutritional factors could also potentially contribute to individual variation in training responses. Finally, a certain amount of individual variation in responses may also be attributed to measurement error, a factor that should be accounted for wherever possible in future studies. In conclusion, there are several factors that could contribute to individual variation in response to standardized training. However, more studies are required to help clarify and quantify the role of these factors. Future studies addressing such topics may aid in the early prediction of high or low training responses and provide further insight into the mechanisms of training adaptation.


Ventilatory Threshold Habitual Physical Activity High Responder Training Response Training Adaptation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research was supported financially by the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD), the Ernst and Ethel Eriksen Trust, and the University of Cape Town. The authors declare that there was no conflict of interest in the preparation of this review.


  1. 1.
    Cohen L, Holliday M. Inferential statistics. In: Statistics for education and physical education. London: Harper; 1979.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hamel P, Simoneau JA, Lortie G, et al. Heredity and muscle adaptation to endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986;18:690–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kohrt WM, Malley MT, Coggan AR, et al. Effects of gender, age, and fitness level on response of VO2max to training in 60–71 yr olds. J Appl Physiol. 1991;71:2004–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouchard C, Rankinen T. Individual differences in response to regular physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:S446–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hautala AJ, Mäkikallio TH, Kiviniemi AM, et al. Cardiovascular autonomic function correlates with the response to aerobic training in healthy sedentary subjects. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285:H1747–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hautala AJ, Kiviniemi AM, Mäkikallio TH, et al. Individual differences in the responses to endurance and resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96:535–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sisson SB, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, et al. Volume of exercise and fitness nonresponse in sedentary, postmenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:539–45.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vollaard NBJ, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Fredriksson K, et al. Systematic analysis of adaptations in aerobic capacity and submaximal energy metabolism provides a unique insight into determinants of human aerobic performance. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:1479–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scharhag-Rosenberger F, Walitzek S, Kindermann W, et al. Differences in adaptations to 1 year of aerobic endurance training: individual patterns of nonresponse. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22:113–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McPhee JS, Williams AG, Degens H, et al. Inter-individual variability in adaptation of the leg muscles following a standardised endurance training programme in young women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109:1111–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karavirta L, Häkkinen K, Kauhanen A, et al. Individual responses to combined endurance and strength training in older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:484–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hautala AJ, Martinmaki K, Kiviniemi A, et al. Effects of habitual physical activity on response to endurance training. J Sports Sci. 2012;30:563–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prud’homme D, Bouchard C, Leblanc C, et al. Sensitivity of maximal aerobic power to training is genotype-dependent. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984;16:489–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McPhee JS, Williams AG, Perez-Schindler J, et al. Variability in the magnitude of response of metabolic enzymes reveals patterns of co-ordinated expression following endurance training in women. Exp Physiol. 2011;96:699–707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Després J-P, Bouchard C, Savard R, et al. Adaptive changes to training in adipose tissue lipolysis are genotype dependent. Int J Obes. 1984;8:87–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thibault MC, Simoneau JA, Côté C, et al. Inheritance of human muscle enzyme adaptation to isokinetic strength training. Hum Hered. 1986;36:341–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bouchard C, Leon AS, Rao DC, et al. The HERITAGE Family Study. Aims, design, and measurement protocol. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27:721–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    An P, Borecki IB, Rankinen T, et al. Evidence of major genes for exercise heart rate and blood pressure at baseline and in response to 20 weeks of endurance training: the HERITAGE Family Study. Int J Sports Med. 2003;24:492–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    An P, Borecki IB, Rankinen T, et al. Evidence of major genes for plasma HDL, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels at baseline and in response to 20 weeks of endurance training: the HERITAGE Family Study. Int J Sports Med. 2005;26:414–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bouchard C, Sarzynski MA, Rice TK, et al. Genomic predictors of the maximal O2 uptake response to standardized exercise training programs. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110:1160–70.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rankinen T, Sung YJ, Sarzynski MA, et al. Heritability of submaximal exercise heart rate response to exercise training is accounted for by nine SNPs. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:892–7.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gaskill SE, Rice TK, Bouchard C, et al. Familial resemblance in ventilatory threshold: the HERITAGE Family Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:1832–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bouchard C, An P, Rice TK, et al. Familial aggregation of VO2max response to exercise training: results from the HERITAGE Family Study. J Appl Physiol. 1999;87:1003–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pérusse L, Gagnon J, Province MA, et al. Familial aggregation of submaximal aerobic performance in the HERITAGE Family Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:597–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rice TK, An P, Gagnon J, et al. Heritability of HR and BP response to exercise training in the HERITAGE Family Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:972–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rice TK, Després J-P, Pérusse L, et al. Familial aggregation of blood lipid response to exercise training in the health, risk factors, exercise training, and genetics (HERITAGE) Family Study. Circulation. 2002;105:1904–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rico-Sanz J, Rankinen T, Joanisse DR, et al. Familial resemblance for muscle phenotypes in the HERITAGE Family Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1360–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bouchard C. Genomic predictors of trainability. Exp Physiol. 2012;97:347–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bray MS, Hagberg JM, Pérusse L, et al. The human gene map for performance and health-related fitness phenotypes: the 2006–2007 update. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:35–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roth SM. Perspective on the future use of genomics in exercise prescription. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104:1243–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thomis M. Commentary on viewpoint: perspective on the future use of genomics in exercise prescription. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104:1251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hawley JA. Commentary on viewpoint: perspective on the future use of genomics in exercise prescription. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104:1253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roth SM. Last word on viewpoint: perspective on the future use of genomics in exercise prescription. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104:1254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bouchard C, Daw EW, Rice TK, et al. Familial resemblance for VO2max in the sedentary state: the HERITAGE Family Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:252–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    An P, Pérusse L, Rankinen T, et al. Familial aggregation of exercise heart rate and blood pressure in response to 20 weeks of endurance training: the HERITAGE Family Study. Int J Sports Med. 2003;24:57–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Puthucheary Z, Skipworth JR, Rawal J, et al. Genetic influences in sport and physical performance. Sports Med. 2011;41:845–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Skinner JS, Jaskólski A, Jaskólska A, et al. Age, sex, race, initial fitness, and response to training: the HERITAGE Family Study. J Appl Physiol. 2001;90:1770–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Boutcher SH, Park Y, Dunn SL, et al. The relationship between cardiac autonomic function and maximal oxygen uptake response to high-intensity intermittent-exercise training. J Sports Sci. 2013;31:1024–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hedelin R, Bjerle P, Henriksson-Larsén K. Heart rate variability in athletes: relationship with central and peripheral performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:1394–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Buchheit M, Chivot A, Parouty J, et al. Monitoring endurance running performance using cardiac parasympathetic function. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:1153–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hautala AJ, Kiviniemi AM, Tulppo MP. Individual responses to aerobic exercise: the role of the autonomic nervous system. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009;33:107–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Timmons JA, Knudsen S, Rankinen T, et al. Using molecular classification to predict gains in maximal aerobic capacity following endurance exercise training in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:1487–96.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Davidsen PK, Gallagher IJ, Hartman JW, et al. High responders to resistance exercise training demonstrate differential regulation of skeletal muscle microRNA expression. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110:309–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Timmons JA. Variability in training-induced skeletal muscle adaptation. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110:846–53.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pareja-Galeano H, Sanchis-Gomar F, García-Giménez JL. Physical exercise and epigenetic modulation: elucidating intricate mechanisms. Sports Med. 2014;44(4):429–36.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ntanasis-Stathopoulos J, Tzanninis JG, Philippou A, et al. Epigenetic regulation on gene expression induced by physical exercise. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2013;13:133–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sanchis-Gomar F, Garcia-Gimenez JL, Perez-Quilis C, et al. Physical exercise as an epigenetic modulator: Eustress, the “positive stress” as an effector of gene expression. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:3469–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Alegría-Torres JA, Baccarelli A, Bollati V. Epigenetics and lifestyle. Epigenomics. 2011;3:267–77.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Flück M. Functional, structural and molecular plasticity of mammalian skeletal muscle in response to exercise stimuli. J Exp Biol. 2006;209:2239–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Skinner JS, Wilmore KM, Krasnoff JB, et al. Adaptation to a standardized training program and changes in fitness in a large, heterogeneous population: the HERITAGE Family Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:157–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Dwyer J, Bybee R. Heart rate indices of the anaerobic threshold. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;15:72–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Meyer T, Gabriel HH, Kindermann W. Is determination of exercise intensities as percentages of VO2max or HRmax adequate? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:1342–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Scharhag-Rosenberger F, Meyer T, Gässler N, et al. Exercise at given percentages of VO2max: heterogeneous metabolic responses between individuals. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13:74–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Katch V, Weltman A, Sady S, et al. Validity of the relative percent concept for equating training intensity. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1978;39:219–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Coyle EF. Physical activity as a metabolic stressor. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:512S–20S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Baar K. The signaling underlying FITness. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009;34:411–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gaskill SE, Walker AJ, Serfass RA, et al. Changes in ventilatory threshold with exercise training in a sedentary population: the HERITAGE Family Study. Int J Sports Med. 2001;22:586–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    McLellan TM, Skinner JS. The use of the aerobic threshold as a basis for training. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981;6:197–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kaikkonen P, Hynynen E, Mann T, et al. Can HRV be used to evaluate training load in constant load exercises? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:435–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kaikkonen P, Hynynen E, Mann T, et al. Heart rate variability is related to training load variables in interval running exercises. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:829–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Stanley J, Peake JM, Buchheit M. Cardiac parasympathetic reactivation following exercise: implications for training prescription. Sports Med. 2013;43:1259–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mann T, Lamberts RP, Lambert MI. Methods of prescribing relative exercise intensity: physiological and practical considerations. Sports Med. 2013;43:613–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lamberts RP, Swart J, Capostagno B, et al. Heart rate recovery as a guide to monitor fatigue and predict changes in performance parameters. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20:449–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tomlin DL, Wenger HA. The relationship between aerobic fitness and recovery from high intensity intermittent exercise. Sports Med. 2001;31:1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Short KR, Sedlock DA. Excess postexercise oxygen consumption and recovery rate in trained and untrained subjects. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83:153–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sedlock DA, Lee M-G, Flynn MG, et al. Excess postexercise oxygen consumption after aerobic exercise training. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2010;20:336–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hagberg JM, Hickson RC, Ehsani AA, et al. Faster adjustment to and recovery from submaximal exercise in the trained state. J Appl Physiol. 1980;48:218–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Buchheit M, Millet GP, Parisy A, et al. Supramaximal training and postexercise parasympathetic reactivation in adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:362–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sugawara J, Murakami H, Maeda S, et al. Change in post-exercise vagal reactivation with exercise training and detraining in young men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;85:259–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kenttä G, Hassmén P. Overtraining and recovery. A conceptual model. Sports Med. 1998;26:1–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Bartholomew JB, Stults-Kolehmainen MA, Elrod CC, et al. Strength gains after resistance training: the effect of stressful, negative life events. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22:1215–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ruuska PS, Hautala AJ, Kiviniemi AM, et al. Self-rated mental stress and exercise training response in healthy subjects. Front Physiol. 2012;3:51.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Stults-Kolehmainen MA, Bartholomew JB. Psychological stress impairs short-term muscular recovery from resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:2220–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Samuels C. Sleep, recovery, and performance: the new frontier in high-performance athletics. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 2009;20:149–59.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kashani M, Eliasson A, Vernalis M. Perceived stress correlates with disturbed sleep: a link connecting stress and cardiovascular disease. Stress. 2012;15:45–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    De Lange AH, Kompier MAJ, Taris TW, et al. A hard day’s night: a longitudinal study on the relationships among job demands and job control, sleep quality and fatigue. J Sleep Res. 2009;18:374–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Demarzo MMP, Stein PK. Mental stress and exercise training response: stress–sleep connection may be involved. Front Physiol. 2012;3:178.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    McEwen BS. Sleep deprivation as a neurobiologic and physiologic stressor: allostasis and allostatic load. Metabolism. 2006;55:S20–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Spiegel K, Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function. Lancet. 1999;354:1435–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Dattilo M, Antunes HK, Medeiros A, et al. Sleep and muscle recovery: endocrinological and molecular basis for a new and promising hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 2011;77:220–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Fukuda S, Morimoto K. Lifestyle, stress and cortisol response: review I: mental stress. Environ Health Prev Med. 2001;6:9–14.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Christian LM, Graham JE, Padgett DA, et al. Stress and wound healing. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2006;13:337–46.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Akerstedt T, Knutsson A, Westerholm P, et al. Mental fatigue, work and sleep. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57:427–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Yang EV, Glaser R. Stress-induced immunomodulation and the implications for health. Int Immunopharmacol. 2002;2:315–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Miller GE. Psychological stress and antibody response to influenza vaccination: when is the critical period for stress, and how does it get inside the body? Psychosom Med. 2004;66:215–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Kiviniemi AM, Hautala AJ, Kinnunen H, et al. Endurance training guided individually by daily heart rate variability measurements. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;101:743–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Kiviniemi AM, Hautala AJ, Kinnunen H, et al. Daily exercise prescription on the basis of HR variability among men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1355–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Capostagno B, Lambert MI, Lamberts RP. Standardized vs. customized high-intensity training: effects on cycling performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9:292–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Buchheit M. Monitoring training status with HR measures: do all roads lead to Rome? Front Physiol. 2014;5:73.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Plews DJ, Laursen PB, Stanley J, et al. Training adaptation and heart rate variability in elite endurance athletes: opening the door to effective monitoring. Sports Med. 2013;43:773–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Daanen HAM, Lamberts RP, Kallen VL, et al. A systematic review on heart-rate recovery to monitor changes in training status in athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012;7:251–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Hawley JA, Tipton KD, Millard-Stafford ML. Promoting training adaptations through nutritional interventions. J Sports Sci. 2006;24:709–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Hawley JA, Burke LM, Phillips SM, et al. Nutritional modulation of training-induced skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110:834–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Civitarese AE, Hesselink MKC, Russell AP, et al. Glucose ingestion during exercise blunts exercise-induced gene expression of skeletal muscle fat oxidative genes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005;289:E1023–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Harber MP, Konopka AR, Jemiolo B, et al. Muscle protein synthesis and gene expression during recovery from aerobic exercise in the fasted and fed states. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;299:R1254–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Hopkins WG, Hawley JA, Burke LM. Design and analysis of research on sport performance enhancement. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:472–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Hopkins WG, Schabort EJ, Hawley JA. Reliability of power in physical performance tests. Sports Med. 2001;31:211–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Paton CD, Hopkins WG, Vollebregt L. Little effect of caffeine ingestion on repeated sprints in team-sport athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:822–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Pyne DB, Hopkins WG, Batterham AM, et al. Characterising the individual performance responses to mild illness in international swimmers. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:752–6.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Telford RD, et al. Reliability and variability of running economy in elite distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1972–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Robertson EY, Saunders PU, Pyne DB, et al. Reproducibility of performance changes to simulated live high/train low altitude. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:394–401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Al Haddad H, Laursen PB, Ahmaidi S, et al. Influence of cold water face immersion on post-exercise parasympathetic reactivation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:599–606.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Saxena A, Minton D, Lee D, et al. Protective role of resting heart rate on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88:1420–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Bouchard C, Blair SN, Church TS, et al. Adverse metabolic response to regular exercise: is it a rare or common occurrence? PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37887.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theresa N. Mann
    • 1
  • Robert P. Lamberts
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael I. Lambert
    • 1
  1. 1.UCT/MRC Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesStellenbosch UniversityTygerbergSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations