Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 743–762 | Cite as

Interference between Concurrent Resistance and Endurance Exercise: Molecular Bases and the Role of Individual Training Variables

  • Jackson J. Fyfe
  • David J. Bishop
  • Nigel K. Stepto
Review Article

Abstract

Concurrent training is defined as simultaneously incorporating both resistance and endurance exercise within a periodized training regime. Despite the potential additive benefits of combining these divergent exercise modes with regards to disease prevention and athletic performance, current evidence suggests that this approach may attenuate gains in muscle mass, strength, and power compared with undertaking resistance training alone. This has been variously described as the interference effect or concurrent training effect. In recent years, understanding of the molecular mechanisms mediating training adaptation in skeletal muscle has emerged and provided potential mechanistic insight into the concurrent training effect. Although it appears that various molecular signaling responses induced in skeletal muscle by endurance exercise can inhibit pathways regulating protein synthesis and stimulate protein breakdown, human studies to date have not observed such molecular ‘interference’ following acute concurrent exercise that might explain compromised muscle hypertrophy following concurrent training. However, given the multitude of potential concurrent training variables and the limitations of existing evidence, the potential roles of individual training variables in acute and chronic interference are not fully elucidated. The present review explores current evidence for the molecular basis of the specificity of training adaptation and the concurrent interference phenomenon. Additionally, insights provided by molecular and performance-based concurrent training studies regarding the role of individual training variables (i.e., within-session exercise order, between-mode recovery, endurance training volume, intensity, and modality) in the concurrent interference effect are discussed, along with the limitations of our current understanding of this complex paradigm.

Keywords

Resistance Exercise Endurance Training Endurance Exercise Training Adaptation Protein Synthesis Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

No funding was used to assist in the preparation of this review. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are directly relevant to the contents of this review. The authors would like to thank Keith Baar (University of California Davis) for providing insightful comments on drafts of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Fluck M, Hoppeler H. Molecular basis of skeletal muscle plasticity–from gene to form and function. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;146:159–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coffey VG, Hawley JA. The molecular bases of training adaptation. Sports Med. 2007;37(9):737–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mahoney DJ, Tarnopolsky MA. Understanding skeletal muscle adaptation to exercise training in humans: contributions from microarray studies. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005;16(4):859–873 vii.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stepto NK, Coffey VG, Carey AL, et al. Global gene expression in skeletal muscle from well-trained strength and endurance athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):546–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hawley JA. Adaptations of skeletal muscle to prolonged, intense endurance training. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2002;29(3):218–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Folland JP, Williams AG. The adaptations to strength training: morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength. Sports Med. 2007;37(2):145–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tesch PA. Skeletal muscle adaptations consequent to long-term heavy resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988;20(5 Suppl):S132–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holloszy JO. Biochemical adaptations in muscle. Effects of exercise on mitochondrial oxygen uptake and respiratory enzyme activity in skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 1967;242(9):2278–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holloszy JO, Coyle EF. Adaptations of skeletal muscle to endurance exercise and their metabolic consequences. J Appl Physiol. 1984;56(4):831–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hickson RC. Interference of strength development by simultaneously training for strength and endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1980;45(2–3):255–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leveritt M, Abernethy PJ, Barry BK, et al. Concurrent strength and endurance training. A review. Sports Med. 1999;28(6):413–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wilson JM, Marin PJ, Rhea MR, et al. Concurrent training: a meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(8):2293–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baar K. Training for endurance and strength: lessons from cell signaling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(11):1939–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hawley JA. Molecular responses to strength and endurance training: are they incompatible? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009;34(3):355–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perry CG, Lally J, Holloway GP, et al. Repeated transient mRNA bursts precede increases in transcriptional and mitochondrial proteins during training in human skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2010;588(Pt 23):4795–810.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Egan B, O’Connor PL, Zierath JR, et al. Time course analysis reveals gene-specific transcript and protein kinetics of adaptation to short-term aerobic exercise training in human skeletal muscle. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e74098.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bodine SC, Stitt TN, Gonzalez M, et al. Akt/mTOR pathway is a crucial regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and can prevent muscle atrophy in vivo. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(11):1014–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Drummond MJ, Fry CS, Glynn EL, et al. Rapamycin administration in humans blocks the contraction-induced increase in skeletal muscle protein synthesis. J Physiol. 2009;587(Pt 7):1535–46.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu H, Kanatous SB, Thurmond FA, et al. Regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle by CaMK. Science. 2002;296(5566):349–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McGee SL, Hargreaves M. AMPK-mediated regulation of transcription in skeletal muscle. Clin Sci (Lond). 2010;118(8):507–18.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bolster DR, Crozier SJ, Kimball SR, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase suppresses protein synthesis in rat skeletal muscle through down-regulated mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(27):23977–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Inoki K, Li Y, Xu T, et al. Rheb GTPase is a direct target of TSC2 GAP activity and regulates mTOR signaling. Genes Dev. 2003;17(15):1829–34.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Atherton PJ, Babraj J, Smith K, et al. Selective activation of AMPK-PGC-1alpha or PKB-TSC2-mTOR signaling can explain specific adaptive responses to endurance or resistance training-like electrical muscle stimulation. FASEB J. 2005;19(7):786–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Apro W, Wang L, Ponten M, et al. Resistance exercise induced mTORC1 signalling is not impaired by subsequent endurance exercise in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;305:E22–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carrithers JA, Carroll CC, Coker RH, et al. Concurrent exercise and muscle protein synthesis: implications for exercise countermeasures in space. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007;78(5):457–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Donges CE, Burd NA, Duffield R, et al. Concurrent resistance and aerobic exercise stimulates both myofibrillar and mitochondrial protein synthesis in sedentary middle-aged men. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(12):1992–2001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Coffey VG, Jemiolo B, Edge J, et al. Effect of consecutive repeated sprint and resistance exercise bouts on acute adaptive responses in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009;297(5):R1441–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Coffey VG, Pilegaard H, Garnham AP, et al. Consecutive bouts of diverse contractile activity alter acute responses in human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106(4):1187–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lundberg TR, Fernandez-Gonzalo R, Gustafsson T, et al. Aerobic exercise alters skeletal muscle molecular responses to resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(9):1680–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang L, Mascher H, Psilander N, et al. Resistance exercise enhances the molecular signaling of mitochondrial biogenesis induced by endurance exercise in human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(5):1335–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Evans WJ. What is sarcopenia? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50:5–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pijnappels M, van der Burg PJ, Reeves ND, et al. Identification of elderly fallers by muscle strength measures. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;102(5):585–92.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reeves ND, Narici MV, Maganaris CN. Effect of resistance training on skeletal muscle-specific force in elderly humans. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96(3):885–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kelley DE, Mintun MA, Watkins SC, et al. The effect of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and obesity on glucose transport and phosphorylation in skeletal muscle. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(12):2705–13.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Morino K, Petersen KF, Dufour S, et al. Reduced mitochondrial density and increased IRS-1 serine phosphorylation in muscle of insulin-resistant offspring of type 2 diabetic parents. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(12):3587–93.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kelley DE, He J, Menshikova EV, et al. Dysfunction of mitochondria in human skeletal muscle in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51(10):2944–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Helgerud J, Rodas G, Kemi OJ, et al. Strength and endurance in elite football players. Int J Sports Med. 2011;32(9):677–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bell GJ, Syrotuik D, Martin TP, et al. Effect of concurrent strength and endurance training on skeletal muscle properties and hormone concentrations in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;81(5):418–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dolezal BA, Potteiger JA. Concurrent resistance and endurance training influence basal metabolic rate in nondieting individuals. J Appl Physiol. 1998;85(2):695–700.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hakkinen K, Alen M, Kraemer WJ, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training versus strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;89(1):42–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kraemer WJ, Patton JF, Gordon SE, et al. Compatibility of high-intensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol. 1995;78(3):976–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    McCarthy JP, Pozniak MA, Agre JC. Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(3):511–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Leveritt M, Abernethy P. Acute effects of high-intensity endurance exercise on subsequent resistance activity. J Strength Cond Res. 1999;13:47–51.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hennessy L, Watson A. The interference effects of training for strength and endurance simultaneously. J Strength Cond Res. 1994;12:9–12.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hunter G, Demment R, Miller D. Development of strength and maximum oxygen uptake during simultaneous training for strength and endurance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1987;27:269–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chromiak JA, Mulvaney DR. A review: the effects of combined strength and endurance training on strength development. J Appl Sport Sci Res. 1990;4:55–60.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Aagaard P, Andersen JL. Effects of strength training on endurance capacity in top-level endurance athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 2):39–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Aagaard P, Andersen JL, Bennekou M, et al. Effects of resistance training on endurance capacity and muscle fiber composition in young top-level cyclists. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):e298–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pilegaard H, Saltin B, Neufer PD. Exercise induces transient transcriptional activation of the PGC-1alpha gene in human skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2003;546(Pt 3):851–8.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stitt TN, Drujan D, Clarke BA, et al. The IGF-1/PI3K/Akt pathway prevents expression of muscle atrophy-induced ubiquitin ligases by inhibiting FOXO transcription factors. Mol Cell. 2004;14(3):395–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fry AC. The role of resistance exercise intensity on muscle fibre adaptations. Sports Med. 2004;34(10):663–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Phillips SM, Tipton KD, Aarsland A, et al. Mixed muscle protein synthesis and breakdown after resistance exercise in humans. Am J Physiol. 1997;273(1 Pt 1):E99–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Atherton PJ, Smith K. Muscle protein synthesis in response to nutrition and exercise. J Physiol. 2012;590(Pt 5):1049–57.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Leger B, Cartoni R, Praz M, et al. Akt signalling through GSK-3beta, mTOR and Foxo1 is involved in human skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy. J Physiol. 2006;576(Pt 3):923–33.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Baar K. The signaling underlying FITness. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009;34(3):411–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Baar K, Wende AR, Jones TE, et al. Adaptations of skeletal muscle to exercise: rapid increase in the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1. FASEB J. 2002;16(14):1879–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Saltin B, Gollnick PD. Skeletal muscle adaptability: significance for metabolism and performance. In: Peachley LD, editor. Handbook of physiology, skeletal muscle. Bethesda: American Physiological Society; 1983. p. 555–631.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Camera DM, Edge J, Short MJ, et al. Early time course of Akt phosphorylation after endurance and resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(10):1843–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Coffey VG, Shield A, Canny BJ, et al. Interaction of contractile activity and training history on mRNA abundance in skeletal muscle from trained athletes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006;290(5):E849–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Coffey VG, Zhong Z, Shield A, et al. Early signaling responses to divergent exercise stimuli in skeletal muscle from well-trained humans. FASEB J. 2006;20(1):190–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Vissing K, McGee SL, Farup J, et al. Differentiated mTOR but not AMPK signaling after strength vs endurance exercise in training-accustomed individuals. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;23(3):355–66.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wilkinson SB, Phillips SM, Atherton PJ, et al. Differential effects of resistance and endurance exercise in the fed state on signalling molecule phosphorylation and protein synthesis in human muscle. J Physiol. 2008;586(Pt 15):3701–17.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Benziane B, Burton TJ, Scanlan B, et al. Divergent cell signaling after short-term intensified endurance training in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;295(6):E1427–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mascher H, Andersson H, Nilsson PA, et al. Changes in signalling pathways regulating protein synthesis in human muscle in the recovery period after endurance exercise. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2007;191(1):67–75.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mascher H, Ekblom B, Rooyackers O, et al. Enhanced rates of muscle protein synthesis and elevated mTOR signalling following endurance exercise in human subjects. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2011;202(2):175–84.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bentzinger CF, Romanino K, Cloetta D, et al. Skeletal muscle-specific ablation of raptor, but not of rictor, causes metabolic changes and results in muscle dystrophy. Cell Metab. 2008;8(5):411–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Cunningham JT, Rodgers JT, Arlow DH, et al. mTOR controls mitochondrial oxidative function through a YY1-PGC-1alpha transcriptional complex. Nature. 2007;450(7170):736–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Schieke SM, Phillips D, McCoy JP Jr, et al. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway regulates mitochondrial oxygen consumption and oxidative capacity. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(37):27643–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Dreyer HC, Fujita S, Cadenas JG, et al. Resistance exercise increases AMPK activity and reduces 4E-BP1 phosphorylation and protein synthesis in human skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2006;576(Pt 2):613–24.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Koopman R, Zorenc AH, Gransier RJ, et al. Increase in S6K1 phosphorylation in human skeletal muscle following resistance exercise occurs mainly in type II muscle fibers. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006;290(6):E1245–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Goodman CA, Miu MH, Frey JW, et al. A phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B-independent activation of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling is sufficient to induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21(18):3258–68.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Hornberger TA, Sukhija KB, Chien S. Regulation of mTOR by mechanically induced signaling events in skeletal muscle. Cell Cycle. 2006;5(13):1391–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Deldicque L, Theisen D, Francaux M. Regulation of mTOR by amino acids and resistance exercise in skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;94(1–2):1–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sancak Y, Peterson TR, Shaul YD, et al. The Rag GTPases bind raptor and mediate amino acid signaling to mTORC1. Science. 2008;320(5882):1496–501.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    West DW, Burd NA, Staples AW, et al. Human exercise-mediated skeletal muscle hypertrophy is an intrinsic process. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;42(9):1371–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    West DW, Kujbida GW, Moore DR, et al. Resistance exercise-induced increases in putative anabolic hormones do not enhance muscle protein synthesis or intracellular signalling in young men. J Physiol. 2009;587(Pt 21):5239–47.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    McConell GK, Lee-Young RS, Chen ZP, et al. Short-term exercise training in humans reduces AMPK signalling during prolonged exercise independent of muscle glycogen. J Physiol. 2005;568(Pt 2):665–76.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Drummond MJ, Dreyer HC, Pennings B, et al. Skeletal muscle protein anabolic response to resistance exercise and essential amino acids is delayed with aging. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104(5):1452–61.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Fry CS, Drummond MJ, Glynn EL, et al. Aging impairs contraction-induced human skeletal muscle mTORC1 signaling and protein synthesis. Skelet Muscle. 2011;1(1):11.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Raue U, Trappe TA, Estrem ST, et al. Transcriptome signature of resistance exercise adaptations: mixed muscle and fiber type specific profiles in young and old adults. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(10):1625–36.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Timmons JA, Knudsen S, Rankinen T, et al. Using molecular classification to predict gains in maximal aerobic capacity following endurance exercise training in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2010;108(6):1487–96.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Creer A, Gallagher P, Slivka D, et al. Influence of muscle glycogen availability on ERK1/2 and Akt signaling after resistance exercise in human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2005;99(3):950–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Churchley EG, Coffey VG, Pedersen DJ, et al. Influence of preexercise muscle glycogen content on transcriptional activity of metabolic and myogenic genes in well-trained humans. J Appl Physiol. 2007;102(4):1604–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Yeo WK, McGee SL, Carey AL, et al. Acute signalling responses to intense endurance training commenced with low or normal muscle glycogen. Exp Physiol. 2010;95(2):351–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Nader GA. Concurrent strength and endurance training: from molecules to man. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(11):1965–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Inoki K, Kim J, Guan KL. AMPK and mTOR in cellular energy homeostasis and drug targets. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;52:381–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mounier R, Lantier L, Leclerc J, et al. Antagonistic control of muscle cell size by AMPK and mTORC1. Cell Cycle. 2011;10(16):2640–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Kimball SR. Interaction between the AMP-activated protein kinase and mTOR signaling pathways. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(11):1958–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Inoki K, Zhu T, Guan KL. TSC2 mediates cellular energy response to control cell growth and survival. Cell. 2003;115(5):577–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Inoki K, Li Y, Zhu T, et al. TSC2 is phosphorylated and inhibited by Akt and suppresses mTOR signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4(9):648–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Gwinn DM, Shackelford DB, Egan DF, et al. AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint. Mol Cell. 2008;30(2):214–26.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Thomson DM, Fick CA, Gordon SE. AMPK activation attenuates S6K1, 4E-BP1, and eEF2 signaling responses to high-frequency electrically stimulated skeletal muscle contractions. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104(3):625–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Katta A, Kakarla SK, Manne ND, et al. Diminished muscle growth in the obese Zucker rat following overload is associated with hyperphosphorylation of AMPK and dsRNA-dependent protein kinase. J Appl Physiol. 2012;113(3):377–84.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    McGee SL, Mustard KJ, Hardie DG, et al. Normal hypertrophy accompanied by phosphorylation and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase alpha1 following overload in LKB1 knockout mice. J Physiol. 2008;586(6):1731–41.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Hahn-Windgassen A, Nogueira V, Chen CC, et al. Akt activates the mammalian target of rapamycin by regulating cellular ATP level and AMPK activity. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(37):32081–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Mounier R, Lantier L, Leclerc J, et al. Important role for AMPKalpha1 in limiting skeletal muscle cell hypertrophy. FASEB J. 2009;23(7):2264–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Jorgensen SB, Viollet B, Andreelli F, et al. Knockout of the alpha2 but not alpha1 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase isoform abolishes 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-4-ribofuranoside but not contraction-induced glucose uptake in skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(2):1070–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Sanchez AM, Candau RB, Csibi A, et al. The role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the coordination of skeletal muscle turnover and energy homeostasis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2012;303(5):C475–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Sanchez AM, Csibi A, Raibon A, et al. AMPK promotes skeletal muscle autophagy through activation of forkhead FoxO3a and interaction with Ulk1. J Cell Biochem. 2012;113(2):695–710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Tong JF, Yan X, Zhu MJ, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase enhances the expression of muscle-specific ubiquitin ligases despite its activation of IGF-1/Akt signaling in C2C12 myotubes. J Cell Biochem. 2009;108(2):458–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Nakashima K, Yakabe Y. AMPK activation stimulates myofibrillar protein degradation and expression of atrophy-related ubiquitin ligases by increasing FOXO transcription factors in C2C12 myotubes. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007;71(7):1650–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Jung CH, Jun CB, Ro SH, et al. ULK-Atg13-FIP200 complexes mediate mTOR signaling to the autophagy machinery. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20(7):1992–2003.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Weigl LG. Lost in translation: regulation of skeletal muscle protein synthesis. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2012;12(3):377–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Kapp LD, Lorsch JR. The molecular mechanics of eukaryotic translation. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:657–704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Browne GJ, Proud CG. Regulation of peptide-chain elongation in mammalian cells. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269(22):5360–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Rose AJ, Frosig C, Kiens B, et al. Effect of endurance exercise training on Ca2+ calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II expression and signalling in skeletal muscle of humans. J Physiol. 2007;583(Pt 2):785–95.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Rose AJ, Kiens B, Richter EA. Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase expression and signalling in skeletal muscle during exercise. J Physiol. 2006;574(Pt 3):889–903.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Browne GJ, Finn SG, Proud CG. Stimulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase leads to activation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase and to its phosphorylation at a novel site, serine 398. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(13):12220–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Browne GJ, Proud CG. A novel mTOR-regulated phosphorylation site in elongation factor 2 kinase modulates the activity of the kinase and its binding to calmodulin. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(7):2986–97.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Wang X, Li W, Williams M, et al. Regulation of elongation factor 2 kinase by p90(RSK1) and p70 S6 kinase. EMBO J. 2001;20(16):4370–9.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Sofer A, Lei K, Johannessen CM, et al. Regulation of mTOR and cell growth in response to energy stress by REDD1. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(14):5834–45.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Kimball SR, Do AN, Kutzler L, et al. Rapid turnover of the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) repressor REDD1 and activation of mTORC1 signaling following inhibition of protein synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(6):3465–75.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Brugarolas J, Lei K, Hurley RL, et al. Regulation of mTOR function in response to hypoxia by REDD1 and the TSC1/TSC2 tumor suppressor complex. Genes Dev. 2004;18(23):2893–904.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    DeYoung MP, Horak P, Sofer A, et al. Hypoxia regulates TSC1/2-mTOR signaling and tumor suppression through REDD1-mediated 14-3-3 shuttling. Genes Dev. 2008;22(2):239–51.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Favier FB, Costes F, Defour A, et al. Downregulation of Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in skeletal muscle is associated with increased REDD1 expression in response to chronic hypoxia. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;298(6):R1659–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Murakami T, Hasegawa K, Yoshinaga M. Rapid induction of REDD1 expression by endurance exercise in rat skeletal muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;405(4):615–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Hulmi JJ, Silvennoinen M, Lehti M, et al. Altered REDD1, myostatin, and Akt/mTOR/FoxO/MAPK signaling in streptozotocin-induced diabetic muscle atrophy. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012;302(3):E307–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Drummond MJ, Fujita S, Abe T, et al. Human muscle gene expression following resistance exercise and blood flow restriction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(4):691–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Philp A, Chen A, Lan D, et al. Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) deacetylase activity is not required for mitochondrial biogenesis or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1alpha (PGC-1alpha) deacetylation following endurance exercise. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(35):30561–70.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Philp A, Schenk S. Unraveling the complexities of SIRT1-mediated mitochondrial regulation in skeletal muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2013;41(3):174–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Ghosh HS, McBurney M, Robbins PD. SIRT1 negatively regulates the mammalian target of rapamycin. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(2):e9199.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Hamilton DL, Philp A. Can AMPK mediated suppression of mTORC1 explain the concurrent training effect? Cell Mol Exp Physiol. 2013;2(1).Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Yang Y, Creer A, Jemiolo B, et al. Time course of myogenic and metabolic gene expression in response to acute exercise in human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2005;98(5):1745–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Lundberg TR, Fernandez-Gonzalo R, Gustafsson T, et al. Aerobic exercise does not compromise muscle hypertrophy response to short-term resistance training. J Appl Physiol. 2013;114(1):81–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    de Souza EO, Tricoli V, Roschel H, et al. Molecular adaptations to concurrent training. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(3):207–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Atherton PJ, Etheridge T, Watt PW, et al. Muscle full effect after oral protein: time-dependent concordance and discordance between human muscle protein synthesis and mTORC1 signaling. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(5):1080–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Phillips BE, Williams JP, Gustafsson T, et al. Molecular networks of human muscle adaptation to exercise and age. PLOS Genet. 2013;9(3):1–15.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Crozier SJ, Kimball SR, Emmert SW, et al. Oral leucine administration stimulates protein synthesis in rat skeletal muscle. J Nutr. 2005;135(3):376–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Baar K, Esser K. Phosphorylation of p70(S6k) correlates with increased skeletal muscle mass following resistance exercise. Am J Physiol. 1999;276(1 Pt 1):C120–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Terzis G, Georgiadis G, Stratakos G, et al. Resistance exercise-induced increase in muscle mass correlates with p70S6 kinase phosphorylation in human subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;102(2):145–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Mayhew DL, Hornberger TA, Lincoln HC, et al. Eukaryotic initiation factor 2B epsilon induces cap-dependent translation and skeletal muscle hypertrophy. J Physiol. 2011;589(Pt 12):3023–37.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Drummond MJ, Fry CS, Glynn EL, et al. Skeletal muscle amino acid transporter expression is increased in young and older adults following resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(1):135–42.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Deldicque L, Atherton P, Patel R, et al. Decrease in Akt/PKB signalling in human skeletal muscle by resistance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;104(1):57–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Ogasawara R, Kobayashi K, Tsutaki A, et al. mTOR signaling response to resistance exercise is altered by chronic resistance training and detraining in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2013;114(7):934–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Hawley JA, Burke LM, Phillips SM, et al. Nutritional modulation of training-induced skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110(3):834–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Beelen M, Burke LM, Gibala MJ, et al. Nutritional strategies to promote postexercise recovery. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2010;20(6):515–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Cochran AJ, Little JP, Tarnopolsky MA, et al. Carbohydrate feeding during recovery alters the skeletal muscle metabolic response to repeated sessions of high-intensity interval exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2010;108(3):628–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Psilander N, Frank P, Flockhart M, et al. Exercise with low glycogen increases PGC-1alpha gene expression in human skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;113(4):951–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Camera DM, West DW, Burd NA, et al. Low muscle glycogen concentration does not suppress the anabolic response to resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2012;113(2):206–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Hulston CJ, Venables MC, Mann CH, et al. Training with low muscle glycogen enhances fat metabolism in well-trained cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(11):2046–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Ortenblad N, Westerblad H, Nielsen J. Muscle glycogen stores and fatigue. J Physiol. 2013;15(591 (Pt 18)):4405–13.Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Derave W, Hansen BF, Lund S, et al. Muscle glycogen content affects insulin-stimulated glucose transport and protein kinase B activity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2000;279(5):E947–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Blomstrand E, Eliasson J, Karlsson HK, et al. Branched-chain amino acids activate key enzymes in protein synthesis after physical exercise. J Nutr. 2006;136(1 Suppl):269S–73S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Rennie MJ, Bohe J, Smith K, et al. Branched-chain amino acids as fuels and anabolic signals in human muscle. J Nutr. 2006;136(1 Suppl):264S–8S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Jamart C, Naslain D, Gilson H, et al. Higher activation of autophagy in skeletal muscle of mice during endurance exercise in the fasted state. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;305:E964–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Coffey VG, Moore DR, Burd NA, et al. Nutrient provision increases signalling and protein synthesis in human skeletal muscle after repeated sprints. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(7):1473–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Areta JL, Burke LM, Ross ML, et al. Timing and distribution of protein ingestion during prolonged recovery from resistance exercise alters myofibrillar protein synthesis. J Physiol. 2013;591(Pt 9):2319–31.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Lambert CP, Frank LL, Evans WJ. Macronutrient considerations for the sport of bodybuilding. Sports Med. 2004;34(5):317–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Blomstrand E, Saltin B. Effect of muscle glycogen on glucose, lactate and amino acid metabolism during exercise and recovery in human subjects. J Physiol. 1999;514(Pt 1):293–302.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Chtara M, Chaouachi A, Levin GT, et al. Effect of concurrent endurance and circuit resistance training sequence on muscular strength and power development. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(4):1037–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Collins MA, Snow TK. Are adaptations to combined endurance and strength training affected by the sequence of training? J Sports Sci. 1993;11(6):485–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Gravelle BL, Blessing DL. Physiological adaptation in women concurrently training for strength and endurance. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14:5–13.Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Cadore EL, Izquierdo M, Alberton CL, et al. Strength prior to endurance intra-session exercise sequence optimizes neuromuscular and cardiovascular gains in elderly men. Exp Gerontol. 2012;47(2):164–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Cadore EL, Izquierdo M, Goncalves Dos Santos M, et al. Hormonal responses to concurrent strength and endurance training with different exercise orders. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(12):3281–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Cadore EL, Izquierdo M, Pinto SS, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent training in the elderly: effects of intrasession exercise sequence. Age (Dordr). 2012;35(3):891–903.Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Craig B, Lucas J, Pohlman R. Effects of running, weightlifting and a combination of both on growth hormone release. J Appl Sport Sci Res. 1991;5:198–203.Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Wojtaszewski JF, MacDonald C, Nielsen JN, et al. Regulation of 5′AMP-activated protein kinase activity and substrate utilization in exercising human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003;284(4):E813–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Lee-Young RS, Koufogiannis G, Canny BJ, et al. Acute exercise does not cause sustained elevations in AMPK signaling or expression. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(8):1490–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Bentley DJ, Smith PA, Davie AJ, et al. Muscle activation of the knee extensors following high intensity endurance exercise in cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;81(4):297–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Bentley DJ, Zhou S, Davie AJ. The effect of endurance exercise on muscle force generating capacity of the lower limbs. J Sci Med Sport. 1998;1(3):179–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Sporer BC, Wenger HA. Effects of aerobic exercise on strength performance following various periods of recovery. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(4):638–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Henneman E. Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge. Science. 1957;126(3287):1345–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Sale DG. Influence of exercise and training on motor unit activation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1987;15:95–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Tannerstedt J, Apro W, Blomstrand E. Maximal lengthening contractions induce different signaling responses in the type I and type II fibers of human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106(4):1412–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Parkington JD, Siebert AP, LeBrasseur NK, et al. Differential activation of mTOR signaling by contractile activity in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003;285(5):R1086–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Rose AJ, Alsted TJ, Jensen TE, et al. A Ca(2+)-calmodulin-eEF2K-eEF2 signalling cascade, but not AMPK, contributes to the suppression of skeletal muscle protein synthesis during contractions. J Physiol. 2009;587(Pt 7):1547–63.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Jentjens R, Jeukendrup A. Determinants of post-exercise glycogen synthesis during short-term recovery. Sports Med. 2003;33(2):117–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Atherton PJ, Rennie MJ. Protein synthesis a low priority for exercising muscle. J Physiol. 2006;573(Pt 2):288–9.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Sale DG, Jacobs I, MacDougall JD, et al. Comparison of two regimens of concurrent strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;22(3):348–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Bartlett JD, Hwa Joo C, Jeong TS, et al. Matched work high-intensity interval and continuous running induce similar increases in PGC-1alpha mRNA, AMPK, p38, and p53 phosphorylation in human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(7):1135–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Burgomaster KA, Howarth KR, Phillips SM, et al. Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans. J Physiol. 2008;586(1):151–60.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Gibala MJ, Little JP, Macdonald MJ, et al. Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease. J Physiol. 2012;590(Pt 5):1077–84.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Gibala MJ, McGee SL, Garnham AP, et al. Brief intense interval exercise activates AMPK and p38 MAPK signaling and increases the expression of PGC-1alpha in human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106(3):929–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Little JP, Safdar A, Bishop D, et al. An acute bout of high-intensity interval training increases the nuclear abundance of PGC-1alpha and activates mitochondrial biogenesis in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011;300(6):R1303–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Little JP, Safdar A, Wilkin GP, et al. A practical model of low-volume high-intensity interval training induces mitochondrial biogenesis in human skeletal muscle: potential mechanisms. J Physiol. 2010;588(Pt 6):1011–22.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    Little JP, Gillen JB, Percival ME, et al. Low-volume high-intensity interval training reduces hyperglycemia and increases muscle mitochondrial capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(6):1554–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Silva RF, Cadore EL, Kothe G, et al. Concurrent training with different aerobic exercises. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33(8):627–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Ronnestad BR, Hansen EA, Raastad T. High volume of endurance training impairs adaptations to 12 weeks of strength training in well-trained endurance athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(4):1457–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Jones TW, Howatson G, Russell M, et al. Performance and neuromuscular adaptations following differing ratios of concurrent strength and endurance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(12):3342–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    Metcalfe RS, Babraj JA, Fawkner SG, et al. Towards the minimal amount of exercise for improving metabolic health: beneficial effects of reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(7):2767–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Rose AJ, Bisiani B, Vistisen B, et al. Skeletal muscle eEF2 and 4EBP1 phosphorylation during endurance exercise is dependent on intensity and muscle fiber type. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009;296(2):R326–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Chen ZP, McConell GK, Michell BJ, et al. AMPK signaling in contracting human skeletal muscle: acetyl-CoA carboxylase and NO synthase phosphorylation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2000;279(5):E1202–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Wojtaszewski JF, Mourtzakis M, Hillig T, et al. Dissociation of AMPK activity and ACCbeta phosphorylation in human muscle during prolonged exercise. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;298(3):309–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    Leveritt M, MacLaughlin H, Abernethy PJ. Changes in leg strength 8 and 32 h after endurance exercise. J Sports Sci. 2000;18(11):865–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Gollnick PD, Piehl K, Saltin B. Selective glycogen depletion pattern in human muscle fibres after exercise of varying intensity and at varying pedalling rates. J Physiol. 1974;241(1):45–57.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Thomson JA, Green HJ, Houston ME. Muscle glycogen depletion patterns in fast twitch fibre subgroups of man during submaximal and supramaximal exercise. Pflugers Arch. 1979;379(1):105–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    Gibala MJ, Little JP, van Essen M, et al. Short-term sprint interval versus traditional endurance training: similar initial adaptations in human skeletal muscle and exercise performance. J Physiol. 2006;575(Pt 3):901–11.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Glowacki SP, Martin SE, Maurer A, et al. Effects of resistance, endurance, and concurrent exercise on training outcomes in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(12):2119–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Gergley JC. Comparison of two lower-body modes of endurance training on lower-body strength development while concurrently training. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(3):979–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jackson J. Fyfe
    • 1
    • 2
  • David J. Bishop
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nigel K. Stepto
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL)Victoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.College of Sport and Exercise ScienceVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations