Sports Medicine

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 179–188 | Cite as

Evaluation and Treatment Recommendations for Acute Injuries to the Ankle Syndesmosis Without Associated Fracture

Review Article

Abstract

Ankle ligamentous injuries are commonly seen in athletes in a variety of sports. Surveys of physicians and trainers of professional sports teams have identified syndesmotic injuries as among the most difficult to treat. In particular, injuries of the ankle syndesmosis have been strongly linked with a prolonged recovery and increased time to return to play. Due to sudden external rotation with the tibiotalar joint in dorsiflexion, these structures are commonly injured in association with fractures of the distal fibula. Surgery is indicated in cases with associated fractures and ligamentous instability, but optimal treatment for syndesmosis injuries without an associated fracture is less clear. A thorough history and physical examination, as well as appropriate imaging, are necessary to effectively diagnose and classify the injury. For stable injuries, short-term immobilization and functional rehabilitation is recommended. Unstable Grade 2 and 3 injuries require surgical fixation. Debate currently exists over rigid screw fixation versus suture button techniques as the ideal fixation method.

References

  1. 1.
    van den Bekerom MP, Lamme B, Hogervorst M, Bolhuis HW. Which ankle fractures require syndesmotic stabilization? J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007;46(6):456–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wright RW, Barile RJ, Surprenant DA, Matava MJ. Ankle syndesmosis sprains in national hockey league players. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1941–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fritschy D. An unusual ankle injury in top skiers. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17(2):282–5 (discussion 5–6).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Porter DA. Evaluation and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Instr Course Lect. 2009;58:575–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zalavras C, Thordarson D. Ankle syndesmotic injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(6):330–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(10):653–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clanton TO, Paul P. Syndesmosis injuries in athletes. Foot Ankle Clin. 2002;7(3):529–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moseley JB, Chimenti BT. Foot and ankle injuries in the professional athlete. In: Baxter DE, editor. The foot and ankle in sport. New York: Mosby; 1995. p. 321–8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin CF, Gross ML, Weinhold P. Ankle syndesmosis injuries: anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(6):372–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boytim MJ, Fischer DA, Neumann L. Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(3):294–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hopkinson WJ, St Pierre P, Ryan JB, Wheeler JH. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle. 1990;10(6):325–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taylor DC, Englehardt DL, Bassett FH 3rd. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. The influence of heterotopic ossification. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(2):146–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Porter DA. Ligamentous injuries of the foot and ankle. In: Fitzgerald RH, Kaufer H, Malkani AL, editors. Orthopaedics. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Edwards GS Jr, De Lee JC. Ankle diastasis without fracture. Foot Ankle. 1984;4(6):305–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sikka RS, Fetzer GB, Sugarman E, Wright RW, Fritts H, Boyd JL, et al. Correlating MRI findings with disability in syndesmotic sprains of NFL players. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(5):371–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lauge-Hansen N. Fractures of the ankle. IV. Clinical use of genetic roentgen diagnosis and genetic reduction. AMA Arch Surg. 1952;64(4):488–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okanobo H, Khurana B, Sheehan S, Duran-Mendicuti A, Arianjam A, Ledbetter S. Simplified diagnostic algorithm for Lauge–Hansen classification of ankle injuries. Radiographics. 2012;32(2):E71–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lauge-Hansen N. Fractures of the ankle. III. Genetic roentgenologic diagnosis of fractures of the ankle. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med. 1954;71(3):456–71.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fites B, Kunes J, Madaleno J, Silvestri P, Johnson DL. Latent syndesmosis injuries in athletes. Orthopedics. 2006;29(2):124–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clanton TO. Ankle sprains, ankle instability and syndesmosis injuries. In: Porter DA, Schon LC, editors. Baxter’s the foot and ankle in sport. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2009. p. 273–390.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sman AD, Hiller CE, Refshauge KM. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for diagnosis of ankle syndesmosis injury: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2012;6(6):6.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harper MC, Keller TS. A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle. 1989;10(3):156–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Yang H, Mekhail AO, Yeasting RA. Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(11):693–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beumer A, Campo MM, Niesing R, Day J, Kleinrensink GJ, Swierstra BA. Screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a cadaver model comparing stainless steel and titanium screws and three and four cortical fixation. Injury. 2005;36(1):60–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gill JB, Risko T, Raducan V, Grimes JS, Schutt RC Jr. Comparison of manual and gravity stress radiographs for the evaluation of supination-external rotation fibular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(5):994–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Polzer H, Kanz KG, Prall WC, Haasters F, Ockert B, Mutschler W, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute ankle injuries: development of an evidence-based algorithm. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2012;4(1):e5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Qamar F, Kadakia A, Venkateswaran B. An anatomical way of treating ankle syndesmotic injuries. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50(6):762–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McCollum GA, van den Bekerom MP, Kerkhoffs GM, Calder JD, van Dijk CN. Syndesmosis and deltoid ligament injuries in the athlete. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;7(7):7.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Amendola A, Williams G, Foster D. Evidence-based approach to treatment of acute traumatic syndesmosis (high ankle) sprains. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2006;14(4):232–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney AM, Hession P, Masterson E. Suture-button syndesmosis fixation: accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;431(431):207–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schepers T. To retain or remove the syndesmotic screw: a review of literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(7):879–83.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Miller AN, Carroll EA, Parker RJ, Boraiah S, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Direct visualization for syndesmotic stabilization of ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(5):419–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW. The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):439–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Naqvi GA, Cunningham P, Lynch B, Galvin R, Awan N. Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(12):2828–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Berlet GC. Transosseous fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: comparison of an interosseous suture and endobutton to traditional screw fixation in 50 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;48(6):620–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Degroot H, Al-Omari AA, El Ghazaly SA. Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(3):250–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Klitzman R, Zhao H, Zhang LQ, Strohmeyer G, Vora A. Suture-button versus screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(1):69–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Massobrio M, Antonietti G, Albanese P, Necci F. Operative treatment of tibiofibular diastasis: a comparative study between transfixation screw and reabsorbable cerclage. Preliminary result. Clin Ther. 2011;162(6):e161–7.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schepers T. Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair. Int Orthop. 2012;36(6):1199–206.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Teramoto A, Suzuki D, Kamiya T, Chikenji T, Watanabe K, Yamashita T. Comparison of different fixation methods of the suture-button implant for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10):2226–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Taylor DC, Tenuta JJ, Uhorchak JM, Arciero RA. Aggressive surgical treatment and early return to sports in athletes with grade III syndesmosis sprains. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(11):1833–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Williams GN, Jones MH, Amendola A. Syndesmotic ankle sprains in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):1197–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Press CM, Gupta A, Hutchinson MR. Management of ankle syndesmosis injuries in the athlete. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2009;8(5):228–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Norkus SA, Floyd RT. The anatomy and mechanisms of syndesmotic ankle sprains. J Athl Train. 2001;36(1):68–73.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Carr J. Malleolar fractures and soft tissue injuries of the ankle. In: Browner B, Jupiter J, Levine A, Trafton PG, editors. Skeletal trauma: fractures, dislocations, ligamentous injuries. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003. p. 2307–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Ohio State University Sports Medicine CenterColumbusUSA
  2. 2.The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public HealthColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Care Point Lewis CenterLewis CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations