Do School-Based Interventions Focusing on Physical Activity, Fitness, or Fundamental Movement Skill Competency Produce a Sustained Impact in These Outcomes in Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review of Follow-Up Studies
- 3.2k Downloads
The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether typically developing children and adolescents (aged 3–18 years) who have participated in school-based interventions have sustained outcomes in PA, fitness, and/or FMS.
A systematic search of six electronic databases (CINAHL® Plus with Full Text, Ovid MEDLINE®, SPORTDiscus™, Scopus, PsycINFO® and ERIC) was conducted from 1995 to 26 July 2012. Included studies were school-based studies (including randomized controlled trials, longitudinal cohort, quasi-experimental, and experimental) that had a positive effect at post intervention in at least one variable and had a follow-up PA, fitness, or FMS assessment at least 6 months after the post-intervention assessment. Risk of bias assessment was guided by the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” statement.
The search identified 14 articles, and some studies addressed multiple outcomes: 13 articles assessed PA; three assessed fitness; and two assessed FMS. No study in this review met four key methodological criteria that have been shown to influence results, i.e., clarity on the randomization process, assessor blinding, analyzing participants in their original groups, and retaining sufficient participants through the entire study. Three-quarters (ten of 13) of the studies addressing PA, reported PA behavior change maintenance. The length of follow-up ranged from 6 months to 20 years, and the degree of PA difference reported was between 3 and 14 min per day. Only one of the three studies assessing fitness reported a sustained impact, whilst both studies that assessed FMS reported maintenance of effects.
It is likely that PA is a sustainable outcome from interventions in children and adolescents, and there is reasonable evidence that interventions of longer than 1 year and interventions that utilize a theoretical model or framework are effective in producing this sustained impact. It would seem probable that FMS are a sustainable outcome in children and adolescents; however, this finding should be viewed with caution given the lack of studies and the risk of bias assessment. More research is needed to assess the sustainability of fitness interventions as this review only included a handful of studies that addressed fitness and only one of these studies found a sustained impact.
KeywordsPhysical Activity Physical Activity Behavior Bias Assessment Sustained Impact Fundamental Movement Skill
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. The authors have no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review. LMB is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship (APP 1013507). JS is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Principal Research Fellowship (APP1026216).
- 1.World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. 2009 (online). http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GlobalHealthRisks_report_full.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2012.
- 4.Verloigne M, Van Lippevelde W, Maes L, et al. Levels of physical activity and sedentary time among 10- to 12-year-old boys and girls across 5 European countries using accelerometers: an observational study within the ENERGY-project. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):34–41.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Castetbon K, Andreyeva T. Obesity and motor skills among 4 to 6-year-old children in the United States: nationally-representative surveys. BMC Pediatr 2012;12(1):28.Google Scholar
- 23.Clarke JE, Metcalfe JS. The mountain of motor development: a metaphor. In: Clarke JE, Humphrey JH, editors. Motor development: research and reviews, vol. 2. Reston: National Association for Sport and Physical Education; 2002. p. 163–90.Google Scholar
- 30.Stodden DF, True LK, Langendorfer SJ, Gao Z. Associations among selected motor skills and health-related fitness: indirect evidence for Seefeldt’s proficiency barrier in young adults? Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84(3):397–403.Google Scholar
- 32.Dobbins M, DeCorby K, Robeson P, et al. School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6–18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;CD007651.Google Scholar
- 38.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Promoting physical activity, active play and sport for pre-school and school-age children and young people in family, pre-school, school and community settings. 2009 (online). http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11773/42883/42883.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
- 39.World Health Organization. The Bangkok charter for health promotion in a globalized world 2005 (online). http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/6gchp/hpr_050829_%20BCHP.pdf. Accessed 30 Jul 2013.
- 45.Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research: conduct, critique, and utilization. 5th ed. St Louis: Elsevier/Saunders; 2005.Google Scholar
- 46.Prochaska J, Redding C, Evers K. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Wiley; 2008. p. 97–121.Google Scholar
- 48.Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(7829):889–97.Google Scholar
- 52.Trudeau F, Laurencelle L, Tremblay J, et al. A long-term follow-up of participants in the Trois–Rivieres semi-longitudinal study of growth and development. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1998;10(4):366–77.Google Scholar
- 63.Shephard RJ, Lavallée H. Impact of enhanced physical education in the prepubescent child: Trois Rivières revisited. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1993;5(2):177–89.Google Scholar
- 64.Hellison D. Teaching responsibility through physical activity. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2003.Google Scholar
- 70.Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.Google Scholar
- 71.McMorris T. Acquisition and performance of sports skills. Chichester: Wiley; 2004.Google Scholar
- 73.Gallahue D, Ozmun J. Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents, adults. 6th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2006.Google Scholar
- 77.Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Physical activity. 2010 (online). http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/health-pubhlth-strateg-phys-act-guidelines. Accessed 19 May 2012.
- 79.World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2010 (online). http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599979_eng.pdf. Accessed 27 Apr 2012.
- 80.Metcalf B, Henley W, Wilkin T. Effectiveness of intervention on physical activity of children: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with objectively measured outcomes (EarlyBird 54). BMJ. 2012;345(e5888):1–11.Google Scholar
- 81.Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Publ Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–31.Google Scholar
- 83.Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N. Improving the reported quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Publ Health. 2004;94(3):361–6.Google Scholar