Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 67–79 | Cite as

Do School-Based Interventions Focusing on Physical Activity, Fitness, or Fundamental Movement Skill Competency Produce a Sustained Impact in These Outcomes in Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review of Follow-Up Studies

  • Samuel K. Lai
  • Sarah A. Costigan
  • Philip J. Morgan
  • David R. Lubans
  • David F. Stodden
  • Jo Salmon
  • Lisa M. BarnettEmail author
Systematic Review

Abstract

Background

Objective

The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether typically developing children and adolescents (aged 3–18 years) who have participated in school-based interventions have sustained outcomes in PA, fitness, and/or FMS.

Methods

A systematic search of six electronic databases (CINAHL® Plus with Full Text, Ovid MEDLINE®, SPORTDiscus™, Scopus, PsycINFO® and ERIC) was conducted from 1995 to 26 July 2012. Included studies were school-based studies (including randomized controlled trials, longitudinal cohort, quasi-experimental, and experimental) that had a positive effect at post intervention in at least one variable and had a follow-up PA, fitness, or FMS assessment at least 6 months after the post-intervention assessment. Risk of bias assessment was guided by the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” statement.

Results

The search identified 14 articles, and some studies addressed multiple outcomes: 13 articles assessed PA; three assessed fitness; and two assessed FMS. No study in this review met four key methodological criteria that have been shown to influence results, i.e., clarity on the randomization process, assessor blinding, analyzing participants in their original groups, and retaining sufficient participants through the entire study. Three-quarters (ten of 13) of the studies addressing PA, reported PA behavior change maintenance. The length of follow-up ranged from 6 months to 20 years, and the degree of PA difference reported was between 3 and 14 min per day. Only one of the three studies assessing fitness reported a sustained impact, whilst both studies that assessed FMS reported maintenance of effects.

Conclusion

It is likely that PA is a sustainable outcome from interventions in children and adolescents, and there is reasonable evidence that interventions of longer than 1 year and interventions that utilize a theoretical model or framework are effective in producing this sustained impact. It would seem probable that FMS are a sustainable outcome in children and adolescents; however, this finding should be viewed with caution given the lack of studies and the risk of bias assessment. More research is needed to assess the sustainability of fitness interventions as this review only included a handful of studies that addressed fitness and only one of these studies found a sustained impact.

Keywords

Physical Activity Physical Activity Behavior Bias Assessment Sustained Impact Fundamental Movement Skill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. The authors have no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review. LMB is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship (APP 1013507). JS is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Principal Research Fellowship (APP1026216).

Supplementary material

40279_2013_99_MOESM1_ESM.docx (39 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 38.5 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. 2009 (online). http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GlobalHealthRisks_report_full.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2012.
  2. 2.
    Kohl HW 3rd, Craig CL, Lambert EV, et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):294–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, et al. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):247–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verloigne M, Van Lippevelde W, Maes L, et al. Levels of physical activity and sedentary time among 10- to 12-year-old boys and girls across 5 European countries using accelerometers: an observational study within the ENERGY-project. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):34–41.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nader PR, Bradley RH, Houts RM, et al. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from ages 9 to 15 years. JAMA. 2008;300(3):295–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rizzo NS, Ruiz JR, Hurtig-Wennlof A, et al. Relationship of physical activity, fitness, and fatness with clustered metabolic risk in children and adolescents: the European youth heart study. J Pediatr. 2007;150(4):388–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams PT. Physical fitness and activity as separate heart disease risk factors: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(5):754–61.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tomkinson GR, Olds TS. Secular changes in pediatric aerobic fitness test performance: the global picture. Med Sport Sci. 2007;50:46–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Cliff DP, et al. Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents: review of associated health benefits. Sports Med. 2010;40(12):1019–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kambas A, Michalopoulou M, Fatouros IG, et al. The relationship between motor proficiency and pedometer-determined physical activity in young children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012;24(1):34–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lopes VP, Rodrigues LP, Maia JAR, et al. Motor coordination as predictor of physical activity in childhood. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(5):663–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hands B, Larkin D, Parker H, et al. The relationship among physical activity, motor competence and health-related fitness in 14-year-old adolescents. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19(5):655–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stodden D, Langendorfer S, Roberton MA. The association between motor skill competence and physical fitness in young adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009;80(2):223–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stodden DF, Goodway JD, Langendorfer SJ, et al. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: an emergent relationship. Quest. 2008;60(2):290–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Castetbon K, Andreyeva T. Obesity and motor skills among 4 to 6-year-old children in the United States: nationally-representative surveys. BMC Pediatr 2012;12(1):28.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D’Hondt E, Deforche B, Vaeyens R, et al. Gross motor coordination in relation to weight status and age in 5- to 12-year-old boys and girls: a cross-sectional study. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6(2 Pt 2):E556–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu Y-C, Wu SK, Cairney J. Obesity and motor coordination ability in Taiwanese children with and without developmental coordination disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(2):801–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lopes VP, Stodden DF, Bianchi MM, et al. Correlation between BMI and motor coordination in children. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(1):38–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lopes VP, Maia JAR, Rodrigues LP, et al. Motor coordination, physical activity and fitness as predictors of longitudinal change in adiposity during childhood. Eur J Sport Sci. 2012;12(4):384–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rodrigues LP, Leitão R, Lopes VP. Physical fitness predicts adiposity longitudinal changes over childhood and adolescence. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16(2):118–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D’Hondt E, Deforche B, Gentier I, et al. A longitudinal analysis of gross motor coordination in overweight and obese children versus normal-weight peers. Int J Obes. 2013;37(1):61–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martins D, Maia J, Seabra A, et al. Correlates of changes in BMI of children from the Azores islands. Int J Obes. 2010;34(10):1487–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Clarke JE, Metcalfe JS. The mountain of motor development: a metaphor. In: Clarke JE, Humphrey JH, editors. Motor development: research and reviews, vol. 2. Reston: National Association for Sport and Physical Education; 2002. p. 163–90.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barnett LM, Morgan PJ, van Beurden E, et al. Perceived sports competence mediates the relationship between childhood motor skill proficiency and adolescent physical activity and fitness: a longitudinal assessment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barnett LM, Van Beurden E, Morgan PJ, et al. Does childhood motor skill proficiency predict adolescent fitness? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(12):2137–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barnett LM, van Beurden E, Morgan PJ, et al. Childhood motor skill proficiency as a predictor of adolescent physical activity. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44(3):252–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Behringer M, vom Heede A, Matthews M, et al. Effects of strength training on motor performance skills in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2011;23(2):186–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Haga M. The relationship between physical fitness and motor competence in children. Child Care Health Dev. 2008;34(3):329–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hands B. Changes in motor skill and fitness measures among children with high and low motor competence: a five-year longitudinal study. J Sci Med Sport. 2008;11(2):155–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stodden DF, True LK, Langendorfer SJ, Gao Z. Associations among selected motor skills and health-related fitness: indirect evidence for Seefeldt’s proficiency barrier in young adults? Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84(3):397–403.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dudley D, Okely A, Pearson P, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical education and school sport interventions targeting physical activity, movement skills and enjoyment of physical activity. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2011;17(3):353–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dobbins M, DeCorby K, Robeson P, et al. School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6–18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;CD007651.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kriemler S, Meyer U, Martin E, et al. Effect of school-based interventions on physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents: a review of reviews and systematic update. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(11):923–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Salmon J, Booth ML, Phongsavan P, et al. Promoting physical activity participation among children and adolescents. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29(1):144–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJR, et al. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr. 2005;146(6):732–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Timperio A, Salmon J, Ball K. Evidence-based strategies to promote physical activity among children, adolescents and young adults: review and update. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7(1 Suppl.):20–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    van Sluijs EMF, McMinn AM, Griffin SJ. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in children and adolescents: systematic review of controlled trials. BMJ. 2007;335(7622):703–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Promoting physical activity, active play and sport for pre-school and school-age children and young people in family, pre-school, school and community settings. 2009 (online). http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11773/42883/42883.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
  39. 39.
    World Health Organization. The Bangkok charter for health promotion in a globalized world 2005 (online). http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/6gchp/hpr_050829_%20BCHP.pdf. Accessed 30 Jul 2013.
  40. 40.
    Jones RA, Sinn N, Campbell KJ, et al. The importance of long-term follow-up in child and adolescent obesity prevention interventions. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6(3/4):178–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Veugelers PJ, Fitzgerald AL. Effectiveness of school programs in preventing childhood obesity: a multilevel comparison. Am J Publ Health. 2005;95(3):432–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF, et al. Compliance with physical activity guidelines: prevalence in a population of children and youth. Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12(5):303–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Matton L, Thomis M, Wijndaele K, et al. Tracking of physical fitness and physical activity from youth to adulthood in females. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(6):1114–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research: conduct, critique, and utilization. 5th ed. St Louis: Elsevier/Saunders; 2005.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Prochaska J, Redding C, Evers K. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Wiley; 2008. p. 97–121.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):E1–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(7829):889–97.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Barnett LM, van Beurden E, Morgan PJ, et al. Six year follow-up of students who participated in a school-based physical activity intervention: a longitudinal cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:48–55.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Salmon J, Ball K, Hume C, et al. Outcomes of a group-randomized trial to prevent excess weight gain, reduce screen behaviours and promote physical activity in 10-year-old children: switch-play. Int J Obes. 2008;32(4):601–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Trudeau F, Espindola R, Laurencelle L, et al. Follow-up of participants in the Trois–Rivières growth and development study: examining their health-related fitness and risk factors as adults. Am J Hum Biol. 2000;12(2):207–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Trudeau F, Laurencelle L, Tremblay J, et al. A long-term follow-up of participants in the Trois–Rivieres semi-longitudinal study of growth and development. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1998;10(4):366–77.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Trudeau F, Laurencelle L, Tremblay J, et al. Daily primary school physical education: effects on physical activity during adult life. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(1):111–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Manios Y, Kafatos A. Health and nutrition education in primary schools in Crete: 10 years follow-up of serum lipids, physical activity and macronutrient intake. Br J Nutr. 2006;95(3):568–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Manios Y, Kafatos I, Kafatos A. Ten-year follow-up of the Cretan health and nutrition education program on children’s physical activity levels. Prev Med. 2006;43(6):442–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gorely T, Morris JG, Musson H, et al. Physical activity and body composition outcomes of the GreatFun2Run intervention at 20 month follow-up. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(1):74–84.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    McManus AM, Masters RSW, Laukkanen RMT, et al. Using heart-rate feedback to increase physical activity in children. Prev Med. 2008;47(4):402–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Taymoori P, Niknami S, Berry T, et al. A school-based randomized controlled trial to improve physical activity among Iranian high school girls. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Klepp K-I, Øygard L, Tell G, et al. Twelve year follow-up of a school-based health education programme. Eur J Publ Health. 1994;4(3):195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bronikowski M, Bronikowska M. Will they stay fit and healthy? A three-year follow-up evaluation of a physical activity and health intervention in Polish youth. Scand J Publ Health. 2011;39(7):704–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kelder S, Perry CL, Klepp K-I. Community-wide youth exercise promotion: long-term outcomes of the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the class of 1989 study. J Sch Health. 1993;63(5):218–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Nader PR, Stone EJ, Lytle LA, et al. Three-year maintenance of improved diet and physical activity: the CATCH cohort. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(7):695–704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Shephard RJ, Lavallée H. Impact of enhanced physical education in the prepubescent child: Trois Rivières revisited. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1993;5(2):177–89.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hellison D. Teaching responsibility through physical activity. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2003.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Janssen I, LeBlanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:40–55.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Taymoori P, Lubans DR. Mediators of behavior change in two tailored physical activity interventions for adolescent girls. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2008;9(5):605–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Michie S, Abraham C. Interventions to change health behaviours: evidence-based or evidence-inspired? Psychol Health. 2004;19(1):29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rhodes RE, Pfaeffli LA. Mediators of physical activity behaviour change among adult non-clinical populations: a review update. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:37–47.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lubans DR, Foster C, Biddle SJH. A review of mediators of behavior in interventions to promote physical activity among children and adolescents. Prev Med. 2008;47(5):463–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    McMorris T. Acquisition and performance of sports skills. Chichester: Wiley; 2004.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Branta C, Haubenstricker J, Seefeldt V. Age changes in motor skills during childhood and adolescence. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1984;12(1):467–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gallahue D, Ozmun J. Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents, adults. 6th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2006.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Logan SW, Robinson LE, Wilson AE, et al. Getting the fundamentals of movement: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38(3):305–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Riethmuller AM, Jones RA, Okely AD. Efficacy of interventions to improve motor development in young children: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2009;124(4):E782–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Barnett LM, Morgan PJ, Van Beurden E, et al. A reverse pathway? Actual and perceived skill proficiency and physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(5):898–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Physical activity. 2010 (online). http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/health-pubhlth-strateg-phys-act-guidelines. Accessed 19 May 2012.
  78. 78.
    Mark AE, Janssen I. Influence of movement intensity and physical activity on adiposity in youth. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(2):164–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2010 (online). http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599979_eng.pdf. Accessed 27 Apr 2012.
  80. 80.
    Metcalf B, Henley W, Wilkin T. Effectiveness of intervention on physical activity of children: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with objectively measured outcomes (EarlyBird 54). BMJ. 2012;345(e5888):1–11.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Publ Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–31.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(8):657–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N. Improving the reported quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Publ Health. 2004;94(3):361–6.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Morgan P, Hansen V. Recommendations to improve primary school physical education: classroom teachers’ perspective. J Educ Res. 2007;101(2):99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Morgan PJ, Hansen V. Classroom teachers’ perceptions of the impact of barriers to teaching physical education on the quality of physical education programs. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008;79(4):506–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Fletcher T, Mandigo J. The primary schoolteacher and physical education: a review of research and implications for Irish physical education. Irish Educ Stud. 2012;31(3):363–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Morgan PJ, Hansen V. Physical education in primary schools: classroom teachers’ perceptions of benefits and outcomes. Health Educ J. 2008;67(3):196–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel K. Lai
    • 1
  • Sarah A. Costigan
    • 2
  • Philip J. Morgan
    • 2
  • David R. Lubans
    • 2
  • David F. Stodden
    • 4
  • Jo Salmon
    • 3
  • Lisa M. Barnett
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Health, School of Health and Social DevelopmentDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Education and Arts, Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and NutritionUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of Health, Centre for Physical Activity and NutritionDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Physical Education and Athletic TrainingUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations