The Development, Retention and Decay Rates of Strength and Power in Elite Rugby Union, Rugby League and American Football
- 4.1k Downloads
Background and aim
Strength and power are crucial components to excelling in all contact sports; and understanding how a player’s strength and power levels fluctuate in response to various resistance training loads is of great interest, as it will inevitably dictate the loading parameters throughout a competitive season. This is a systematic review of training, maintenance and detraining studies, focusing on the development, retention and decay rates of strength and power measures in elite rugby union, rugby league and American football players.
A literature search using MEDLINE, EBSCO Host, Google Scholar, IngentaConnect, Ovid LWW, ProQuest Central, ScienceDirect Journals, SPORTDiscus™ and Wiley InterScience was conducted. References were also identified from other review articles and relevant textbooks. From 300 articles, 27 met the inclusion criteria and were retained for further analysis.
Study quality was assessed via a modified 20-point scale created to evaluate research conducted in athletic-based training environments. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) quality rating of the included studies was 16.2 ± 1.9; the rating system revealed that the quality of future studies can be improved by randomly allocating subjects to training groups, providing greater description and detail of the interventions, and including control groups where possible.
Percent change, effect size (ES = [Post-Xmean − Pre-Xmean)/Pre-SD) calculations and SDs were used to assess the magnitude and spread of strength and power changes in the included studies. The studies were grouped according to (1) mean intensity relative volume (IRV = sets × repetitions × intensity; (2) weekly training frequency per muscle group; and (3) detraining duration. IRV is the product of the number of sets, repetitions and intensity performed during a training set and session. The effects of weekly training frequencies were assessed by normalizing the percent change values to represent the weekly changes in strength and power. During the IRV analysis, the percent change values were normalized to represent the percent change per training session. The long-term periodized training effects (12, 24 and 48 months) on strength and power were also investigated.
Across the 27 studies (n = 1,015), 234 percent change and 230 ES calculations were performed. IRVs of 11–30 (i.e. 3–6 sets of 4–10 repetitions at 74–88 % one-repetition maximum [1RM]) elicited strength and power increases of 0.42 % and 0.07 % per training session, respectively. The following weekly strength changes were observed for two, three and four training sessions per muscle region/week: 0.9 %, 1.8 % and 1.3 %, respectively. Similarly, the weekly power changes for two, three and four training sessions per muscle group/week were 0.1 %, 0.3 % and 0.7 %, respectively. Mean decreases of 14.5 % (ES = −0.64) and 0.4 (ES = −0.10) were observed in strength and power across mean detraining periods of 7.2 ± 5.8 and 7.6 ± 5.1 weeks, respectively. The long-term training studies found strength increases of 7.1 ± 1.0 % (ES = 0.55), 8.5 ± 3.3 % (ES = 0.81) and 12.5 ± 6.8 % (ES = 1.39) over 12, 24 and 48 months, respectively; they also found power increases of 14.6 % (ES = 1.30) and 12.2 % (ES = 1.06) at 24 and 48 months.
Based on current findings, training frequencies of two to four resistance training sessions per muscle group/week can be prescribed to develop upper and lower body strength and power. IRVs ranging from 11 to 30 (i.e. 3–6 sets of 4–10 repetitions of 70–88 % 1RM) can be prescribed in a periodized manner to retain power and develop strength in the upper and lower body. Strength levels can be maintained for up to 3 weeks of detraining, but decay rates will increase thereafter (i.e. 5–16 weeks). The effect of explosive-ballistic training and detraining on pure power development and decay in elite rugby and American football players remain inconclusive. The long-term effects of periodized resistance training programmes on strength and power seem to follow the law of diminishing returns, as training exposure increases beyond 12–24 months, adaptation rates are reduced.
KeywordsResistance Training Bench Press American Football Training Dose Rugby League
- 1.Baechle T, Earle R. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2000.Google Scholar
- 2.Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. Designing resistance training programs. 3rd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2004.Google Scholar
- 3.Stone M, Stone M, Sands W. Principles and practice of resistance training. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2007.Google Scholar
- 6.Berger R. Optimum repetitions for the development of strength. Res Quart. 1963;33:334–8.Google Scholar
- 9.Fleck S. Detraining: its effects on endurance and strength. Nat Strength Cond J. 1994;22–28.Google Scholar
- 10.Hakkinen K. Neuromuscular adaptation during strength training, aging, detraining and immobilization. Phys Rehab Med. 1994;6(3):161–98.Google Scholar
- 11.Komi PV. Strength and power in sport. 2nd ed. London: Blackwell; 2002.Google Scholar
- 24.Muller E. Influence of training and of inactivity on muscle strength. Arc Phys Med Rehab. 1970;51:449–62.Google Scholar
- 31.Newton R. Expression and development of maximal muscle power (thesis). Lismore: Southern Cross University; 1997.Google Scholar
- 32.Ebben W. Complex training: brief review. J Sports Sci Med. 2002;1:42–6.Google Scholar
- 33.Fleck S. Periodized strength training: a critical review. J Strength Cond Res. 1999;13(1):82–9.Google Scholar
- 38.Zatsiorsky V, Kraemer W. Science and practice of strength training. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1995.Google Scholar
- 40.Wilmore J, Costill D, Kennedy L. Physiology of sport and exercise. 4th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2008.Google Scholar
- 42.Gay R. A comparison of four strength maintenance programs for football players (thesis). Waco: Texas Technological College; 1969.Google Scholar
- 54.Hoffman J, Kraemer W, Fry A, et al. The effects of self-selection for frequency of training in a winter conditioning program for football. J App Sport Sci Res. 1990;4(3):76–82.Google Scholar
- 59.Jones K, Hunter G, Fleisig G, et al. The effects of compensatory acceleration on upper-body strength and power in collegiate football players. J Strength Cond Res. 1999;13(2):99–105.Google Scholar
- 60.Legg D, Burnham R. In-season shoulder abduction strength changes in football players. J Strength Cond Res. 1999;13(4):381–3.Google Scholar
- 61.O’Connor D, Crowe M. Effects of six weeks of B-hydroxy-B-methylbutyrate (HMB) and HMB/creatine supplementation on strength, power and anthropometry of highly trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;21(2):419–23.Google Scholar
- 63.Schneider V, Arnold B, Martin K, et al. Detraining effects in college football players during the competitive season. J Strength Cond Res. 1998;12(1):42–5.Google Scholar
- 64.Stone M, Sanborn K, Smith L, et al. Effects of in-season (5 weeks) creatine and pyruvate supplementation on anaerobic performance and body composition in American football players. Int J Sport Nut. 1999;9:146–65.Google Scholar
- 65.Wenzel R, Perfetto E. The effect of speed versus non-speed training in power development. J App Sport Sci Res. 1992;6(2):82–7.Google Scholar
- 68.Baker D, Newton R. Methods to increase the effectiveness of maximal power training for the upper body. Strength Cond J. 2005;27(6):24–32.Google Scholar
- 71.Kaneko M, Fuchimoto T, Togji H, et al. Training effects of different loads on the force velocity relationship and mechanical power output in human muscle. Scand J Sport Sci. 1993;5:50–5.Google Scholar
- 73.Poprawski B. Aspects of strength, power and speed in shot put training. New Stud Ath. 1988;3:89–93.Google Scholar
- 74.Schmidtbleicher M. Training for power events. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. London: Blackwell Science; 1994. p. 381–95.Google Scholar
- 79.Enoka R. Neuromechanical basis of kinesiology. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1994.Google Scholar
- 80.McLester J, Bishop P, Gulliams M. Comparison of 1 day and 3 days per week of equal-volume resistance training in experienced subjects. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14:273–81.Google Scholar
- 82.Gillam G. Effects of frequency of weight training on muscle strength enhancement. J Sports Med. 1981;21:432–6.Google Scholar
- 89.Stone MH, Sands WA, Pierce KC, et al. Power and power potentiation among strength-power athletes: preliminary study. Int J Sports Phyiol Perform. 2008;3(1):55–67.Google Scholar
- 91.Issurin V, editor. Block periodization as an alternative approach to preparation of high-performance canoe/kayak paddlers. Warsaw: Coaches’ Symposium International Canoe Federation, 2009.Google Scholar
- 93.Hoffman JR, Fry A, Howard R, et al. Strength, speed and endurance changes during the course of a division I basketball season. J App Sport Sci Res. 1991;5(3):144–9.Google Scholar