Economic Implications of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance and Treatment: A Guide for Clinicians
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing worldwide, with significant morbidity and associated costs. Treatment allocation depends on the stage of diagnosis; however, resource utilization can be significant across all stages. We aimed to summarize the available data on the cost effectiveness of surveillance of and treatments for HCC in the context of current treatment guidelines. We performed a focused review of studies investigating the economic burden and cost effectiveness of HCC surveillance treatment modalities published between January 2000 and January 2019. The overall economic burden of HCC is increasing in the USA and in several countries worldwide due to its rising incidence and the proliferation of therapies. Liver transplantation is a cost-effective strategy for early-stage HCC treatment in selected patients. In settings where liver transplantation is not available or in patients awaiting transplant, ablative or locoregional therapies are cost effective with increases in quality-adjusted life-years. First-line therapy with sorafenib for advanced stage HCC is cost effective in the treatment of compensated cirrhosis. The cost effectiveness of recently approved systemic therapies for advanced HCC require further investigation. Existing studies have shown that guideline-recommended surveillance techniques and several available therapies for the treatment of HCC are cost effective; however, there are limitations in the literature, including reliance on suboptimal modeling with incomplete/simplified model structure or inadequate inputs. With increasing therapeutic options in patients with HCC, understanding their relative value is critical in designing HCC treatment algorithms.
AL conducted the literature search and wrote the manuscript. NDP conceived the study and outlined the manuscript concept, and reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No funding was received in relation to this review.
Conflict of interest
Alisa Likhitsup declared no conflict of interest. Neehar Parikh has the following declarations: consultant—Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Freenome; advisory boards—Eisai, Exelixis, Wako, Bayer; research funding—Bayer, Exact Sciences, Target Pharmasolutions.
- 3.White DL, Thrift AP, Kanwal F, Davila J, El-Serag HB. Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in all 50 United States, from 2000 through 2012. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(4):812.e5–820.e5.Google Scholar
- 6.Younossi Z, Stepanova M, Ong JP, Jacobson IM, Bugianesi E, Duseja A, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the fastest growing cause of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(4):748.e3–755.e3.Google Scholar
- 8.Tapper EB, Parikh ND. Mortality due to cirrhosis and liver cancer in the United States, 1999–2016: observational study. BMJ. 2018;18(362):k2817.Google Scholar
- 10.Singal AG, Mittal S, Yerokun OA, Ahn C, Marrero JA, Yopp AC, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma screening associated with early tumor detection and improved survival among patients with cirrhosis in the US. Am J Med. 2017;130(9):1099.e1–1106.e1.Google Scholar
- 12.Tzartzeva K, Obi J, Rich NE, Parikh ND, Marrero JA, Yopp A, et al. Surveillance imaging and alpha fetoprotein for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(6):1706.e1–1718.e1.Google Scholar
- 15.Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Abecassis MM, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;68(2):723–50.Google Scholar
- 16.Galle PR, Forner A, Llovet JM, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Raoul J-L, et al. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69(1):182–236.Google Scholar
- 28.Zangneh HF, Wong WW, Sander B, Bell CM, Mumtaz K, Kowgier M, et al. Cost effectiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance after a sustained virologic response to therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus infection and advanced fibrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(9):1840.e16–1849.e16.Google Scholar
- 29.Kanwal F, Kramer J, Asch SM, Chayanupatkul M, Cao Y, El-Serag HB. Risk of hepatocellular cancer in HCV patients treated with direct-acting antiviral agents. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(4):996.e1–1005.e1.Google Scholar
- 34.Younossi Z, Stepanova M, Ong JP, Jacobson IM, Bugianesi E, Duseja A, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the fastest growing cause of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(4):748.e3–755.e3.Google Scholar
- 36.McAdam-Marx C, McGarry LJ, Hane CA, Biskupiak J, Deniz B, Brixner DI. All-cause and incremental per patient per year cost associated with chronic hepatitis C virus and associated liver complications in the United States: a managed care perspective. J Manag Care Pharm. 2011;17(7):531–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Kaplan DE, Chapko MK, Mehta R, Dai F, Skanderson M, Aytaman A, et al. Healthcare costs related to treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma among veterans with cirrhosis in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(1):106.e5–114.e5.Google Scholar
- 44.Qiu WQ, Shi JF, Guo LW, Mao AY, Huang HY, Hu GY, et al. Medical expenditure for liver cancer in urban China: a 10-year multicenter retrospective survey (2002–2011). J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(1):163–70.Google Scholar
- 54.Zhu AX, Kang Y-K, Yen C-J, Finn RS, Galle PR, Llovet JM, et al. Ramucirumab after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increased α-fetoprotein concentrations (REACH-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30937-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 58.Vitale A, Farinati F, Burra P, Trevisani F, Giannini EG, Ciccarese F, et al. Utility-based criteria for selecting patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation: a multicenter cohort study using the alpha-fetoprotein model as a survival predictor. Liver Transpl. 2015;21(10):1250–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 60.Landman MP, Feurer ID, Pinson CW, Moore DE. Which is more cost-effective under the MELD system: primary liver transplantation, or salvage transplantation after hepatic resection or after loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria? HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(11):783–91.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 68.Parikh ND, Marshall VD, Green M, Lawrence TS, Razumilava N, Owen D, et al. Effectiveness and cost of radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy for treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of SEER-Medicare. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018;62(5):673–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 70.Vilgrain V, Bouattour M, Sibert A, Lebtahi R, Ronot M, Pageaux G-P, et al. SARAH: a randomised controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of selective internal radiation therapy (with yttrium-90 microspheres) and sorafenib in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2017;66(1):S85–6.Google Scholar
- 76.Leung HW, Liu CF, Chan AL. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus SBRT for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2016;18(11):69.Google Scholar
- 78.Vilgrain V, Pereira H, Assenat E, Guiu B, Ilonca AD, Pageaux GP, et al. Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(12):1624–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar